Jump to content

Cole Irvin


wildcard

Recommended Posts

There is a spot open in the rotation and this is his chance to claim it.     KC has the 28th best hitting team.   So that is a low bar for Irvin to cross.    But he is a control pitcher who last started a game on May 31st.   Nine days between starts is not optimum.  Good luck Cole.   The O's need some to step up.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On paper this looks to align well for Cole. It would be a MAJOR improvement to the team if he can just eat innings of even 5ish ERA ball. Hopefully he can go six and give up less than 5. Based on his track record it seems he is capable of doing that. Hopefully the command issues that plagued him early are resolved. I had high hopes for him coming into the season. He was my sleeper guy for this year. I need him to do well so I look less stupid than I already look. 

Edited by banks703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Baltimorecuse said:

I'm asking this without any intention of trolling. This is the best the organization can produce.  

They didn't "produce" him. He had a decent enough track record from Oakland to expect him to be able to slot in as a fifth starter. We all know the short comings of the pitching in the O's system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I'm asking this without any intention of trolling. This is the best the organization can produce.  

It's not like they had two highly regarded former first round pitchers in the system when they arrived and have been picking high in the draft every year since.

You should temper your expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, maybenxtyr said:

They didn't "produce" him. He had a decent enough track record from Oakland to expect him to be able to slot in as a fifth starter. We all know the short comings of the pitching in the O's system.

I thought about discussing the word choice but produce could be meant a number of different ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's not like they had two highly regarded former first round pitchers in the system when they arrived and have been picking high in the draft every year since.

You should temper your expectations.

I'm just hoping that they can draft some more middle infielders and leave them in the MiL's until they can keep them around well into their 30's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's not like they had two highly regarded former first round pitchers in the system when they arrived and have been picking high in the draft every year since.

You should temper your expectations.

You mean, "Yes".  Of course these things are all mutable over time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I'm asking this without any intention of trolling. This is the best the organization can produce.  

They also have Vallimont, Zimmerman and Rom in AAA.

But Irvin has a track record of success. Just hasnt happened this year for whatever reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2021-2022 gave Irvin a chance to acclimate, but overall in the MLB talent landscape, I do believe him getting 300 IP or whatever it was had more to do with OAK than him.      Other Orgs had similar talents who just couldn't earn the reps on more talented teams.

Hopefully he'll be fine for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Just Regular said:

2021-2022 gave Irvin a chance to acclimate, but overall in the MLB talent landscape, I do believe him getting 300 IP or whatever it was had more to do with OAK than him.      Other Orgs had similar talents who just couldn't earn the reps on more talented teams.

Hopefully he'll be fine for us.

Or a home ballpark suited to his pitching style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not be excited to see him pitch vs the Blue Jays.   But he O's have you set up to face the Royals, then Cubs, then may be the Reds.    He may be able to do that.   Hopefully Grayson will be ready sometime in the next month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Or a home ballpark suited to his pitching style.

This is a very plausible thesis. If you look at Irvin's Home/Away splits, they were huge during 2022 and less so, but still significant in 2021: .874 / .581 OPS-against in '22; .777 / .714 in '21.

Maybe the FO thought Walltimore (he's a southpaw) and exceptionally good IF defense--something that we haven't lived up to this year so far, although I don't know the stats--might make up for the deep, wide plains of Oakland. 

Edited by LA2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A question precedes #2: when will the left field wall be fixed?  I think I remember Elias saying they probably went too far, which is quite literally true.  No reason they can't fix it quickly.  I had no problem with them moving it back but it is pretty absurd where it is.
    • On #3, I would guess that Elias is very wary about going longer than 3 years for a starting pitcher (maybe four years if pitcher is younger and AAV is favorable).  I think Mike and Sig believe the history of long-term SP deals isn’t favorable and the wrong deal could derail a mid-market team with dead money.  I’m not sure they are wrong (e.g., Patrick Corbin, Strasberg).   I don’t think ownership cares directly; I would guess they just give Elias an annual baseball ops budget and forecast and he can choose how he manages against that.   Not in play Gerrit Cole Corbin Burnes Max Fried Blake Snell Jack Flaherty    Possible free agent targets Yusei Kikuchi Nathan Eovaldi Nick Pivetta Sean Manaea Luis Severino Alex Cobb Max Scherzer Justin Verlander Jose Quintana Frankie Montas Spencer Turnbull Andrew Heaney Matthew Boyd   Possible trade targets Garret Crotchet Sandy Alcantera Jesus Luzardo Eduardo Cabrera Reid Detmers Emerson Hancock Jordan Montgomery Lance McCullers Jr.
    • Is Webb anything special.  I would rather replace Webb with Norfolk shuttle guy.
    • Our SS is Gunnar, our CF in this scenario would be Cowser, and C is Adley. Hopefully none of those guys are in contention for being the team's worst hitter next season. We don't need a power bat in LF - we need to add a good contact bat, that can use all fields and run.
    • Kemp was part of it but bringing back 2 UTIL IF is blocking your best prospect when your manager covets veteranosity. If they aren’t resigned then Holliday gets a longer leash. 
    • LF is a bit of a waste of a spot for #9 hitter.  Its not a premium defensive position so you shoudl be able to get a decent bat who can also play there.  If you're worst hitter isn't an SS, C or CF, either you're contending for a WS , or something isn't quite right.  And this team isn't quite WS contenders just yet.
    • A lot could change between now and then, but right now he's the 4th starter. I like Povich more than most around here and think he can be a solid 4th starter. He may have been command days, but he doesn't get hit hard.  The cool new Baseball Savant chart shows his fastball and curve and have above average movement and is why his slightly below average velocity (.9 MPH below MLB avg for LHP) plays up a bit.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...