Jump to content

Friday June 16: an afternoon at Wrigley Field


SteveA

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Cause it's awesome watching this team without him.

I guess you hit the head when Mateo is up?

Cause that's about as pretty as your mom.

 

And yes I know he had a hit last inning, Mountcastle gets the occasional hit as well.

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad Hyde had the quick hook on Irvin. Absolute garbage inning getting jacked up w those HRs

Thankfully we came back and are in this game. Take no chances and bring in Baumann 

When can Grod come back up?

Irvin not looking like a good Elias move right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Alasdaire said:

Watching how Cole Irvin has turned out does not exactly have me itching to send an even bigger package of prospects away for another "dependable" starter.

We have enough prospects.  We don’t have enough starting pitching. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I guess you hit the head when Mateo is up?

Cause that's about as pretty as your mom.

I don't mind watching Mateo suffer at the plate because I know he can pick it in the field at SS.  Makes him tolerable.

A "your mom" joke is about as original from you as your hipster taste in music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

I don't mind watching Mateo suffer at the plate because I know he can pick it in the field at SS.  Makes him tolerable.

A "your mom" joke is about as original from you as your hipster taste in music.

Wasn't going for original, much like your taste in music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

The differences are numerous.

  1. Can be younger
  2. Can be less expensive
  3. Eliminates the possibility of choice from the player
  4. Can be a shorter duration commitment

It makes no sense at all to just mention free agents that under performed as a reason to not trade for someone.

The sense is:

  1. The cost of starting pitching is high whether in terms of money spent or prospects traded.
  2. Pitchers are notoriously prone to serious injuries and liable to fall off for various other reasons.

Reasonable minds can disagree as to how much risk is worth taking and which route is practical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Alasdaire said:

The sense is:

  1. The cost of starting pitching is high whether in terms of money spent or prospects traded.
  2. Pitchers are notoriously prone to serious injuries and liable to fall off for various other reasons.

Reasonable minds can disagree as to how much risk is worth taking and which route is practical.

Cost is relative.

If I have a lot more of something than I need it isn't "expensive" for me to give some of it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SteveA said:

So what was it, a bloop that the runner on first had to hold up on and it dropped right in front of Santander and he threw to 2nd for the force?

Degree of difficulty?

Santander sprang on ball and threw a strike to second.  After he missed the ball he made a pretty difficult play.  It looked pretty. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

So what was it, a bloop that the runner on first had to hold up on and it dropped right in front of Santander and he threw to 2nd for the force?

Degree of difficulty?

Tony feet first slid and it hit his glove. Picked it up and threw to second. Easily thrown out. Degree of difficulty to catch...5/10?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...