Jump to content

O's lead the AL in fielding percentage (.989)


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • wildcard changed the title to O's lead the AL in fielding percentage (.989)
10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

But they have the third worst team OAA in all of baseball.

Just went to Baseball Savant and looked at this.  As I suspected, the only position player with a positive OAA was Mateo.  Frazier is pretty awful on this measurement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Interesting,  SG, To what do you attribute the O's second best record in the MLB?   How are they doing that?  Just interested in your perspective.

The BP, especially Bautista and Cano, is the biggest factor imo.

Its like the mid 2010s again

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

But they have the third worst team OAA in all of baseball.

I have been consistently surprised at this since we were average last year and have essentially the same team. Was Odor worth that much at 2B? :) Or is Gunnar that bad? I don't think so. 

Some other metrics have us better... RTot has us #7, Fielding Bible DRS #19, BIS-DRS #17. I honestly have no idea which is the best but the eye test says we are around average. I do not think we are a bad defensive team. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

 Thanks.  I would add a full year of Adley to that.

Do you think the pen is better than last year outside of the addition of Cano?

I'm not sure it's better even if you consider Cano.

Despite the unreal start is Cano any better than Lopez was last season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I have been consistently surprised at this since we were average last year and have essentially the same team. Was Odor worth that much at 2B? :) Or is Gunnar that bad? I don't think so. 

Some other metrics have us better... RTot has us #7, Fielding Bible DRS #19, BIS-DRS #17. I honestly have no idea which is the best but the eye test says we are around average. I do not think we are a bad defensive team. 

From what I've seen Adley's metrics have taken a pretty fair hit this season.  Hopefully it's just the ebb and flow of things and not the new normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

 Thanks.  I would add a full year of Adley to that.

Do you think the pen is better than last year outside of the addition of Cano?

It’s probably not better as a whole but Cano/Bautista is better than any duo we had last year, at least so far.

Honestly, they should be in MVp consideration. This team’s record looks completely different if they were merely just good to very good as opposed to the dominating pitchers they have been.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are essentially tied with Boston for 2nd best offense in the division too. 

We are scoring about 5 runs per game this year so far........compared to 4.16 per game in 2022.   That's a significant improvement.  (we had the 4th best offense in the division last year)

Edited by Aglets
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not sure it's better even if you consider Cano.

Despite the unreal start is Cano any better than Lopez was last season?

So if the pen overall is about as good as last year and that is the main factor in the O's winning ways this season, how are they on a 102 win pace?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...