Jump to content

What contributions do you realistically see John Means making to the 2023 Orioles team?


Jim'sKid26

Recommended Posts

https://www.mlb.com/news/john-means-suffers-back-strain-return-likely-delayed

"Elias is unsure when Means could return, but it won’t be until sometime after the Aug. 1 Trade Deadline."

I think there are 3 big questions with John Means:

1. Does he pitch at all in 2023?

2. If he does pitch in 2023, how effective is he?

3. Does his return effect how Mike Elias manages the roster around the trade deadline and beyond?

I personally think he will return to pitch in 2023 but will be less effective than most on this board would hope. 

The impact on the front office's roster management choices is TBD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think SG's scenario is the best case, and I think its likely he doesn't see a major league mound until September if he does at all.  Based on his interview w/ Brown and Palmer the other night, he's barely started throwing.  So I think we're looking at most of August in the minors doing some build up.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Elias is allowing Means to have any effect on his trade plans, he should be fired. Fortunately, I don't think he's that dumb. 

Means is a bonus that you gladly welcome if it happens, which is probably won't. But if it does, I don't think it will be in relief. I do think he would start and maybe they're short starts at first backed up by Irvin or whomever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Realistically, Means might make a few MLB starts in September. Maybe he’s a postseason option in a creative role. He is LH. 
 

Means is the direct replacement for Gibson in 2024. A rotation of Bradish, Wells, Kremer, Means, and Rodriguez, is pretty solid, and should have us in the playoffs again. Irvin, Hall, Povich, etc… will be depth. Irvin is out of options though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’ll make a few starts, hopefully help solidify the front end of the rotation for a hopeful playoff run. Considering he won’t really realistically be back until September, it’d be real nice to have a deep playoff run so he can get innings and be ready for 2024. If the playoff rotation looks something like Wells, Bradish, Means…I can’t hate on that too much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping we see Grayson Rodriguez back after the break and I'm hoping he looks more like we expect him to look. If that's the case, I don't see Means providing much from a starting perspective. He can fill the role the Zimmermann is currently filling. I think he'll prove to be an upgrade over Irvin as a fill-in. 

It also depends on if we add a legitimate starter at the deadline. Wells and Bradish have cemented themselves in the rotation. I hope Rodriguez does that after the break. Irvin is a fill-in. Both Kremer and Gibson are questions, particularly Gibson. He was good early, but hasn't been good of late. He's also got a 4.04 career ERA pre-All-Star break and 5.11 after. 

Means will have to earn his way back in the rotation in 2023 by showing he's completely healthy and the pitcher he was pre-injury. IF he does that, perhaps Gibson or Kremer go to the pen. But more likely, I see him as a multi-inning reliever with a low to mid 4 ERA which would be an upgrade to some of the last guys in our pen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Food for thought: Wells and Bradish are both on pace to throw more innings at a lower ERA than Means ever did.  

But Means with a better ERA+ in 2019 than Bradish or Wells. Balls were juiced in 2019. It was really fun to watch Means pitch that year. Wasn't much else to root for. I just remember thinking: "How did everyone miss this?" He was never on the prospect rankings. He wasn't being mentioned by Roch and Steve at MASN. I saw a lefty that looked really comfortable on the mound dropping nasty change-ups whenever he wanted. His velocity wasn't a joke either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Matt Bennett said:

But Means with a better ERA+ in 2019 than Bradish or Wells. Balls were juiced in 2019. It was really fun to watch Means pitch that year. Wasn't much else to root for. I just remember thinking: "How did everyone miss this?" He was never on the prospect rankings. He wasn't being mentioned by Roch and Steve at MASN. I saw a lefty that looked really comfortable on the mound dropping nasty change-ups whenever he wanted. His velocity wasn't a joke either. 

Means is pretty jacked. Maybe he started a new lifting routine and had a velo increase. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...