Jump to content

Specific Trade Ideas


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

95% or greater he opts out for a better contract.

You could be right.  However, because of his injury history he may play it safe and take the guaranteed money, rather than trying to get more.  It's hard to say what the odds are, but I wouldn't risk it if I were Elias, when there are other options where we wouldn't have those concerns.

Edited by Greg Pappas
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

You could be right.  However, because of his injury history he may play it safe and take the guaranteed money, rather than trying to get more.  It's hard to say what the odds are, but I wouldn't risk it if I were Elias, when there are other options where we wouldn't have those concerns.

He had injury history when he got that contact.  Look at DeGrom.  Some one will give him more than 3/49.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

He had injury history when he got that contact.  Look at DeGrom.  Some one will give him more than 3/49.   

True, though he's older now, so even more risk.  But again, you may be right. My point is that I don't feel the O's in particular would trade for him with less risky options available.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

I see your point. I am definitely not against acquiring him as he would be a major upgrade for our rotation. But acquiring him makes it essential that was also acquire at least 1 more very good bullpen arm. We have a serious weakness in the 6th and 7th inning. When the starter can go 6, we can patch it together most times for the 7th until we get to the back end guys. But like last night when the starter goes only 5 or even just pitches into the 6th, we normally have problems because IMO Baker/Baumann are just League average guys and some of the others are well below that threshold.

Honestly …. Kremer is trending up. 

Bradish, Wells, and Kremer can pitch with anyone. I suppose if you’re going to send/shutdown Grayson you’d add another. 
 

But , I really think we should be after nonclosers. 
 

Cubs Merryweather, Alzoley, Leiter 

Pirates De Los Santos, Hernandez,  Moreta , Ramirez 

Gnats Hunter Harvey, Thompson, Edwards

A’s Long, Jackson, Sears

Rockies Bird, Lawrence , Suter

 

Pick your poison

 


 

Hader would work for me if you can get him for somebody in our 15-20 range and a lottery ticket.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, clapdiddy said:

Not trying to be a smart aleck, but what position are you defending?  You imply that the package is too big, then ask why they want Hall or Akin.  Hall and Akin have good arms...could be the old "change of scenery" thing.   

Again, not trying to give you a hard time, just making sure I understand.

I don’t think they’d want Hall right now….Akin ?

I don’t see Elias selling off 6 guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

Do you not consider Stroman in the group of pitchers that you listed? He’s having an excellent season has has two great starts against the Rays (when they were rolling) and has a player option at the end of the year. 

Will never root for Marcus Stroman...will turn off game first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Honestly …. Kremer is trending up. 

Bradish, Wells, and Kremer can pitch with anyone. I suppose if you’re going to send/shutdown Grayson you’d add another. 
 

But , I really think we should be after nonclosers. 
 

Cubs Merryweather, Alzoley, Leiter 

Pirates De Los Santos, Hernandez,  Moreta , Ramirez 

Gnats Hunter Harvey, Thompson, Edwards

A’s Long, Jackson, Sears

Rockies Bird, Lawrence , Suter

 

Pick your poison

 


 

Hader would work for me if you can get him for somebody in our 15-20 range and a lottery ticket.

Kremer has been better lately (other than the Twins start here where he got shelled by a horrible offense). But I would rather put our postseason hopes in acquiring a better starter to slot in the first three games and then using him as a fourth starter (if needed). Snell, Eduardo Rodriguez, Stroman, Cease, and even Giolito are all better than Kremer IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bemorewins said:

Do you not consider Stroman in the group of pitchers that you listed? He’s having an excellent season has has two great starts against the Rays (when they were rolling) and has a player option at the end of the year. 

Stroman is on the same level as the other rental SP for this season but I don’t like him as a FA target, primarily because he’ll be 33 at the start of the next season and the other guys will be 29 (Giolito) or 31 (Snell, Montgomery, Ed Rod). He’s also a low-K, GB pitcher and I think more flyball oriented pitchers are better fits in OPACY. I also have some preference for guys that are stronger against LH batters than RH batters given the OPACY dimensions, which the other guys have (even Giolito, who has reverse splits) and Stroman is pretty much neutral. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Stroman is on the same level as the other rental SP for this season but I don’t like him as a FA target, primarily because he’ll be 33 at the start of the next season and the other guys will be 29 (Giolito) or 31 (Snell, Montgomery, Ed Rod). He’s also a low-K, GB pitcher and I think more flyball oriented pitchers are better fits in OPACY. I also have some preference for guys that are stronger against LH batters than RH batters given the OPACY dimensions, which the other guys have (even Giolito, who has reverse splits) and Stroman is pretty much neutral. 

I appreciate you laying out the details that inform you particular preference.

All of these guys are FAs at the end of this year no? So no matter who we would be acquiring the focus would be primarily the rest of this year.

If we were to resign/sign one of these guys in the offseason that would give us 6 starters with Means coming back. Then one would have to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

95% or greater he opts out for a better contract.

Probably true unless he likes it in BAL with the young stars and great defense behind him. Then you try to renegotiate with him to avoid the opt out. He seems like a low profile guy, maybe he would like the stability vs FA. Maybe he would like an opportunity to stick it to BOS. This is from a DET fan forum where they advocate renegotiating, The biggest question would be if he’d take a straight salary increase or would want more years added. I have no doubt he’d get at least $20M per year in free agency, but I’d be surprised if he was only offered a 3-year deal. Taijuan Walker (4/$72M), and Jameson Tallion (4/$68M) each managed to secure 4-year deals this winter and E-rod has been better than both in recent history. 

I would thing he would have to seriously consider not opting out if his 3/$49M went to 3/$55M plus a 4th year at $20M for 4/$75M. An AAV just over what Gibson-Frazier cost so Payroll neutral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

Probably true unless he likes it in BAL with the young stars and great defense behind him. Then you try to renegotiate with him to avoid the opt out. He seems like a low profile guy, maybe he would like the stability vs FA. Maybe he would like an opportunity to stick it to BOS. This is from a DET fan forum where they advocate renegotiating, The biggest question would be if he’d take a straight salary increase or would want more years added. I have no doubt he’d get at least $20M per year in free agency, but I’d be surprised if he was only offered a 3-year deal. Taijuan Walker (4/$72M), and Jameson Tallion (4/$68M) each managed to secure 4-year deals this winter and E-rod has been better than both in recent history. 

I would thing he would have to seriously consider not opting out if his 3/$49M went to 3/$55M plus a 4th year at $20M for 4/$75M. An AAV just over what Gibson-Frazier cost so Payroll neutral.

I think it’s prudent to assume you are getting Rodriguez or Stroman without an extension in place, which is probably for the best anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • He had a good ERA.  I think his FIP was 3.66 the one year and 4.66 the other.   
    • I don’t understand why Basallo is untouchable. Don’t we have Adley. Trade Basallo for a #2 if possible asap.
    • Difference in trading vets from a team still in rebuild mode versus trading vets from a team with World Series aspirations.  We've not seen him trade vets since the rebuild ended.
    • Understood. But here's the thing (given the current economic structure of the game) there are three ways to handle payroll for a winning team (as I see them). One is the Rays/Brewers/Guardians way. Where you have maybe one long term substantive contract (mostly done while player is young and before he has made real money or achieved real fame) and most of the time the contract is an exploitive type deal with a kid from another country who comes from a context of poverty (not judging it is what it is). These teams continuously are reloading/retooling/ and have constant roster reshaping and turnover. The goal is to make the postseason and hopeful every once in a blue moon the stars align while you are there and you may be able to go all the way! While these teams are often good, they are rarely great. And are even less willing to do what it takes to get them over the top IMO. The proof is in the fact that this model has never led to championship success (unless you want to use the Marlins of over 20 years ago from 03'). Another model is the "big spenders model", who spend seriously and have World Series aspirations. Some spend all on FA (like the Padres/Mets) and are super aggressive with trades hoping to augment their talent as they chase championships, but rarely does this work because the foundation of the team is usually built so poorly. They may be good for a season or shorter term but struggle to sustain. Then there are teams like the Phillies/Dodgers who do a combo of developing and spending (let's call that the best of both worlds). Obviously this is the most preferable because you get the short and long term rewards. But it may not be realistic to think that the O's could ever do/have what it takes to fully do both. Then there is the Braves and Astros model. Still a higher payroll but minimizing of risks through extending younger players (Braves) or avoiding most long term contracts (Astros) but paying higher salaries on shorter deals. Obviously both franchises have been successful (won WS). Having said all this the reality exists that if/when you do longer term contracts (extensions or FA deals) for franchise/cornerstone/superstar type players, you most likely won't get the best value on the back end (think Paul Goldschmidt this year). That's just the economics of the game. But the thing is, the owners (especially our new group) have the money and then some to write off those things and keep rolling as "the cost of doing business".  When examining all winners of the World Series in the last decade a pattern is pretty apparent (with exception of the Astros first championship in 17') you have to spend in order to win. 
    • An alternative... also from the Rangers:  Nathan Eovaldi.  FA after this season but has a $20m vesting option for 2025 if he throws 300 innings combined between '23 & '24.  It'll be close.  Between Scherzer (40 this month) and Eovaldi (34) who would you prefer? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...