Jump to content

Friday, August 4: Buck and the Mets come to town


SteveA

Recommended Posts

Just now, Hallas said:

The Mets just bought themselves a top-10 farm system.

 

It's kind of a tough spot since the Yankees are above .500, but they don't really have much shot beating out the teams in front of them to make the playoffs so for them to buy 2 relievers at the deadline when they already have a good bullpen is really bizarre.

Cohen will spend on a level that would make George Steinbrenner look modest, as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, baltfan said:

Cashman hasn’t been very good. The teams he won with were developed by Gene Michael. He shouldn’t survive this year.  

He was okay in the 2000s but he also got lucky with injuries, especially since they were relying on older FAs.  If ARod got injured like Trout has those teams struggle a lot more.  I'm not sure if they're still doing okay if Posada doesn't OPS .880 through his mid-late 30s.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hallas said:

The Mets just bought themselves a top-10 farm system.

Any free agent who signs with the Mets would do themselves justice to demand a No-Trade Clause.

Also the rules committee should be having discussion about this turning into a potential problem on a broader scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Malike said:

Cohen will spend on a level that would make George Steinbrenner look modest, as well.

What matters is whether he's learned to spend intelligently--not easy to learn when it comes to baseball

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hallas said:

The Mets just bought themselves a top-10 farm system.

 

It's kind of a tough spot since the Yankees are above .500, but they don't really have much shot beating out the teams in front of them to make the playoffs so for them to buy 2 relievers at the deadline when they already have a good bullpen is really bizarre.

I watched at least two different shows saying the Yankees should sell some of their bullpen arms because it was the best thing they had to sell.  Then the Yankees bought some arms.  I guess if your the Yankees you cant really ever sell if your within a couple games of the wildcard.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Billy F-Face3 said:

Any free agent who signs with the Mets would do themselves justice to demand a No-Trade Clause.

Also the rules committee should be having discussion about this turning into a potential problem on a broader scale.

 

They're paying luxury tax on the money they're forking over for those prospects.  I don't really see a problem.  Teams can decline to offer them prospects.

 

That said I feel like small market owners are going to try and shut this down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • But again, nothing you say here changes anything. This team is going to be built from within. They are not going to try to build any other way…and they are right about that. This doesn’t mean they don’t need to spend but again, those guys will supplement the roster. And don’t think they won’t talk about how they added guys at the deadline for 2025. That they are “like free agent signings”.
    • It was the holder, not the kicker.  Jackson may not be perfect, but he's far from the problem this year. He's got a fumbling issue that may at some point cost this team a game or two, but there is no doubt he's playing some good football right now.
    • Yeah I'm surprised that Cleveland has been this bad. They were good last season. 
    • Gunnar also signed a one year contract.
    • The when is really two questions.  One is when do the O's stop being handicapped by the risk-averse mindset that's governed their behavior since 2018, and the second is when does a 74 year-old billionaire tire of being told he has to wait a little longer because Jackson Holliday needs to further refine his new toe-tap?  Oh, and we also need to nail down a position for Coby Mayo, and so on.  No question?  I think the questions are numerous and many of them pretty important, and because they're so important, I think we'll start seeing a change in approach beginning this offseason.  I certainly hope so. Nothing I've said disputes the need for internal development or diminishes the role our current core of young players - some of whom haven't exactly made a seamless transition - will need to play for sustained success.  Nor is it a call for stupid FA spending.  It very much is an argument that time needs to be thought of differently now that two very successful regular seasons are behind the O's and the huge impediment of Angelos ownership is no longer a factor.
    • If he wants to join Hyde’s staff in some capacity, I’d be fine with that. Or are you actually talking about him being on the team as a player?
    • So why would you have sought payment if you were owner as you previously stated?  Since you are not known for being litigious and all? Also as I am sure you’re already aware the media exclusivity rights in Vegas are already shared by 6 major league teams. Which clearly was not the situation in DC as the territory was expressly the territory of the Baltimore Orioles.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...