Jump to content

Update Again Again: OPACY lease officially official, done and approved, for real this time


spleen1015

Recommended Posts

I have never doubted for a minute that a lease agreement would get signed.  But these negotiations took longer than the Paris Peace Talks, as Angelos looked for ways to leverage this into other unwarranted business advantages for him beyond the walls of the stadium.  I look forward to learning whether the six months of stalling led to the State making any concessions that will give the MSA or the legislature any concerns. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I am so surprised. All of the experts on here with zero commercial real estate lease negotiation or ownership all told me I was wrong that these negotiations aren’t straight forward and take a long time. They also said being on a month to month meant doom and gloom when I said it didn’t matter it is just part of the process of the negotiations. With all of the people with zero experience telling me I was wrong, I was almost certain that I was. 
Just kidding, told you so. Stay in your lane. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, sevastras said:

Wow, I am so surprised. All of the experts on here with zero commercial real estate lease negotiation or ownership all told me I was wrong that these negotiations aren’t straight forward and take a long time. They also said being on a month to month meant doom and gloom when I said it didn’t matter it is just part of the process of the negotiations. With all of the people with zero experience telling me I was wrong, I was almost certain that I was. 
Just kidding, told you so. Stay in your lane. 

Usually "I Told You So" posts are annoying, but this made me laugh very hard. A+ message board dry sarcasm. Thank you, sevastras. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

I have never doubted for a minute that a lease agreement would get signed.  But these negotiations took longer than the Paris Peace Talks, as Angelos looked for ways to leverage this into other unwarranted business advantages for him beyond the walls of the stadium.  I look forward to learning whether the six months of stalling led to the State making any concessions that will give the MSA or the legislature any concerns. 

John was just legitimately concerned that when all the other mega-casino/sportsbook owners had their own baseball stadium as part of their 500-acre gambling complex he'd be left out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The terms of the new lease include two five-year extension options, according to a source with direct knowledge of the agreement.

Ravens lease is 15 years with two lease options.

Don't expect much stadium improvements over the.  winter. .Ravens signed lease in January and took about four months to get the financing in place. Probably will have to get a bank loan besides the bonds being sold. Ravens was for $450mm and $200 mm is a bank loan from JP Morgan Chase.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

So now what do they do with the money?

New sound system and scoreboards would be nice. 

I second that.

I was in the Eutaw Street bleachers Wednesday.  The speakers were not working at all.  We couldn't hear a thing that Adrienne was saying.  Two weeks ago, the speakers were working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Frobby said:

I have never doubted for a minute that a lease agreement would get signed.  But these negotiations took longer than the Paris Peace Talks, as Angelos looked for ways to leverage this into other unwarranted business advantages for him beyond the walls of the stadium.  I look forward to learning whether the six months of stalling led to the State making any concessions that will give the MSA or the legislature any concerns. 

Yes … billionaires and Governors hugging each other and partying about some “accomplishment” always makes me nervous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think Fangraphs decides who’s eligible as of the start of the season.  Unlike other publications that release all their team lists at the same time, Fangraphs slow rolls theirs over a 6 month period or so.   Therefore, to put all the teams on the same footing, they base eligibility as of the start of the season.   
    • Clearly he has a roster spot for a playoff series with the Yankees….
    • My stance would be pretty simple. Im not trading any of the top 3 prospects and im not trading any of the young talent that is controlled long term that is currently on the ML roster. That means besides the very obvious guys that players like Cowser and Kjerstad are also off the board. Now, if a player like Skubal becomes available, that could cause me to change my mind but as I look around at the reported available players, I don’t see anyone worth a top 20 prospect or young contributing ML talent. Guys like Norby and Stowers fall into that latter category but they aren’t here right now and they are just redundant on our roster. So I’m telling teams if you want to deal with us, guys like Norby, Stowers and Beavers are who will lead deals and that several vets, led by Mountcastle, are also on the board in any potential contender/contender(fringe contender) type deal. I think whether it’s Fedde or relievers like Estevez or Nardi or Garcia or even Scott, I think we have enough to get deals done without trading any of the guys we would rather not lose. This is all to say that I just don’t see that proven elite high end talent available this deadline to justify trading any of those top guys.
    • He’s an interesting test case. Prior to 2023, wasn’t good. In 2023, he threw around 200 innings iirc in the KBO and learned the sweeper. Now he is pitching much better. His statcast stats are pretty good although he’s not missing bats or getting Ks and he has a tendency to give up some hard contact.  
    • I don’t think he can be counted on for that. If you can get him cheap fine but his career WAR is 3.5 and he has 3.7 this year. Plus he’s 33 innings short of his career high …did 120-130 range twice. How could that be your acquisition that can be counted on when he could quite possibly run out of gas? Or get to a team where performance matters and feel the pressure versus pitching for the White Sox…A horrid team that everyone knew was going to suck.
    • Yea but how are you defining that?  Is Fedde a #3 or better, for example?
    • With all due respect … I think you are counting on Mayo to come up and immediately perform. I don’t think it’s realistic… possible yes. But, most guys have an adjustment. If it’s one thing we’ve seen from Hyde is the reluctance to give regular time to the rookies. Didn’t see it with Stowers, Norby, etc. They did  give it to Holliday but I think there was pressure being put on him to do so.  You think he would replace Urias who doesn’t play everyday with Mayo and sit the other guys to play him every day which is what a player needs during that adjustment period? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...