Jump to content

Rule 5 Draft Targets


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

https://www.mlb.com/news/one-intriguing-rule-5-draft-prospect-for-each-team

The lists of best available players are starting to come out from the MLB.com and BA. The Rule 5 draft is on Weds, Dec. 6th. Picks can actually be traded in this draft.

I could see the O’s targeting a RH pitcher to bring to ST for a bullpen spot. There’s a couple of guys that fit that description. 

CJ Van Eyk from Toronto. Angel Bastardo from BOS.   Matt Sauer NYY. Anthony Hoopi-Tuionetoa TEX. Tyler Owen’s ATL. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

I really don't see the os keeping anyone that they draft. Too much depth already.  I guess you take them and see if injuries open up a roster spot after spring training 

I agree with this.  Especially since we’ll be picking later.  
 

I don’t know any of the names mentioned above, but TEX and ATL are a good place to start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

I really don't see the os keeping anyone that they draft. Too much depth already.  I guess you take them and see if injuries open up a roster spot after spring training 

We have the following guys competing for bullpen roles. I don't know who is available in the Rule 5 draft, but i assume somebody in there is worthy of the competition and potentially being better than all of them:

Baker
Baumann
Vespi
Akin
Tate
Webb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s take your pick on what type of pitcher you want,

- The TJS/Shoulder injury big bodied frame. Most likely a former top pick or prospect. 

- The int’l signing that has taken a bit longer to get going but really doesn’t have much experience above A ball.

- The undersized, over achiever, low rd draft pick, that their stuff might play up in a bullpen role. 

With all that said… I like Matt Sauer from the Yankees. Big frame. Injury history. Former big bonus HS guy in 2017. The Yankees are stacked with relievers so they might have given him extra time to keep going as a SP. 

Sauer and the guy from Texas seem like they have the upside to be high leverage relievers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A reliever would seem to make the most sense but I haven’t seen one that intrigues me.  I find Troy Johnston interesting but he’d just be competing for O’Hearns spot.

Per Baseball America

Troy Johnston, 1B, Marlins

Johnston turns 27 years old halfway through the 2023 season and he’s a 5-foot-11 first baseman who doesn’t really have other defensive options. That’s why he is unprotected. Here’s why he could get picked: Johnston hit .307/.399/.549 between Double-A Pensacola and Triple-A Jacksonville. He chases more than teams would like, but he hits the ball relatively hard and makes a ton of contact when he swings at pitches in the zone. A team looking for an inexpensive first baseman/DH could pick him and let him compete for the job in spring training, where he would try to become next year’s version of Ryan Noda.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=johnst000tro

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

A reliever would seem to make the most sense but I haven’t seen one that intrigues me.  I find Troy Johnston interesting but he’d just be competing for O’Hearns spot.

Per Baseball America

Troy Johnston, 1B, Marlins

Johnston turns 27 years old halfway through the 2023 season and he’s a 5-foot-11 first baseman who doesn’t really have other defensive options. That’s why he is unprotected. Here’s why he could get picked: Johnston hit .307/.399/.549 between Double-A Pensacola and Triple-A Jacksonville. He chases more than teams would like, but he hits the ball relatively hard and makes a ton of contact when he swings at pitches in the zone. A team looking for an inexpensive first baseman/DH could pick him and let him compete for the job in spring training, where he would try to become next year’s version of Ryan Noda.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=johnst000tro

Guy sounds pretty interesting. LH bat, too. I could see a scenario where they select him just to sort of compete in ST and act as injury insurance for guys like O'Hearn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

https://www.mlb.com/news/one-intriguing-rule-5-draft-prospect-for-each-team

The lists of best available players are starting to come out from the MLB.com and BA. The Rule 5 draft is on Weds, Dec. 6th. Picks can actually be traded in this draft.

I could see the O’s targeting a RH pitcher to bring to ST for a bullpen spot. There’s a couple of guys that fit that description. 

CJ Van Eyk from Toronto. Angel Bastardo from BOS.   Matt Sauer NYY. Anthony Hoopi-Tuionetoa TEX. Tyler Owen’s ATL. 

If the O’s trade up for a higher Rule V pick, this board is going to be down for a while.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From that article, I'll take a guess at Tyler Owens from the Braves.

Braves: Tyler Owens, RHP (No. 26)
The Braves went over slot to sign Owens out of high school back in 2019, and after shaking off an injury-riddled 2021 season, he's shown some bat-missing ability in both starting and relief roles, reaching Double-A for the first time. He has the kind of power repertoire, with a fastball that touches 98 mph and a hard slider, that could be intriguing coming out of a big league bullpen full-time.

We're already poaching the Braves bullpen coach, why not grab someone from their system while we're at it. 

I want to say anyone with who is right-handed and has upper 90s velocity should be an option because that's our current biggest need. If Cano goes down, our best right-handed power arm is... Webb? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

A reliever would seem to make the most sense but I haven’t seen one that intrigues me.  I find Troy Johnston interesting but he’d just be competing for O’Hearns spot.

Per Baseball America

Troy Johnston, 1B, Marlins

Johnston turns 27 years old halfway through the 2023 season and he’s a 5-foot-11 first baseman who doesn’t really have other defensive options. That’s why he is unprotected. Here’s why he could get picked: Johnston hit .307/.399/.549 between Double-A Pensacola and Triple-A Jacksonville. He chases more than teams would like, but he hits the ball relatively hard and makes a ton of contact when he swings at pitches in the zone. A team looking for an inexpensive first baseman/DH could pick him and let him compete for the job in spring training, where he would try to become next year’s version of Ryan Noda.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=johnst000tro

Sounds like a future Cincy Red or Blue Jay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Baltimore and DC surrounding population around 9 million. NYC around 24 million.
    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...