Jump to content

Jackson Holliday 2024


btdart20

Recommended Posts

On 7/20/2024 at 3:29 PM, Rbiggs2525 said:

Love the guy and when he’s right, to me the most talented hitter on the roster. There is something off with him. We are used to the Mounty that can hit it 440 almost clearing both bullpens. He hit the ball on the screws against the Yankees and it went 95 MPH and 365 feet.

Are we playing the Blue Jays soon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/19/2024 at 8:37 PM, LookitsPuck said:

Anybody know why Holliday came out in the 6th? Hit 2 dingers and a walk. Says defensive substitution, so maybe they’re getting him back in slowly defensively? 

Yes.  They said they were going to do this. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/20/2024 at 3:21 PM, Roy Firestone said:

Mounty and Westy too(Westy will figure it out)..Mounty is basically who he is...incredibly streaky and slumpy...

I used to sing a stupid song on my head that went like Adam Jones will swing at everything. Now he is nowhere near that level but he’s getting there lately. Sliders are killing him just like they killed Adam Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Urias has to go on the DL, there's room for either Holiday or Mayo to join the team in Miami.  Holliday would be better for the defense, as he slots in at 2B and allows Westburg to stay at 3B.  Mayo would do more to boost the offense which currently is having trouble against lefties.  

Short of injuries, the only way either Holliday or Mayo gets up here before September is if Elias is able to trade Urias, Mountcastle or Mateo.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Three Run Homer said:

Short of injuries, the only way either Holliday or Mayo gets up here before September is if Elias is able to trade Urias, Mountcastle or Mateo.  

This is something I was thinking about earlier. I don’t think they can trade Mateo at this point. 

I don’t know that there’s anyone else in the system who can play SS at the ML level if Gunnar (god forbid) goes out for any extended period. I’m sure they were assuming that Holliday could take over if that happened, but that’s probably not going to be on the table with the elbow issue. 

Other than Holliday, it feels like they have a lot of IFs who you could put at 2B or maybe 3B, and you’d be okay, but that  you couldn’t really get by with at SS — guys like Westburg, Urias, Norby, Maton, etc. Servideo is playing a lot of SS for the Tides at the moment, but his bat won’t play at the ML level.

I think they have to keep Mateo for the rest of the year.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, e16bball said:

This is something I was thinking about earlier. I don’t think they can trade Mateo at this point. 

I don’t know that there’s anyone else in the system who can play SS at the ML level if Gunnar (god forbid) goes out for any extended period. I’m sure they were assuming that Holliday could take over if that happened, but that’s probably not going to be on the table with the elbow issue. 

Other than Holliday, it feels like they have a lot of IFs who you could put at 2B or maybe 3B, and you’d be okay, but that  you couldn’t really get by with at SS — guys like Westburg, Urias, Norby, Maton, etc. Servideo is playing a lot of SS for the Tides at the moment, but his bat won’t play at the ML level.

I think they have to keep Mateo for the rest of the year.

Plus Mateo has a real bench role and he has expanded that role because he plays a solid second base.

Urias makes more sense to trade because he should have more value as he is more of an everyday player than Mateo is and there are enough offense starved teams out there where Urias becomes a decent starting player for them.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Plus Mateo has a real bench role and he has expanded that role because he plays a solid second base.

Urias makes more sense to trade because he should have more value as he is more of an everyday player than Mateo is and there are enough offense starved teams out there where Urias becomes a decent starting player for them.

On which contending teams would Urias be an upgrade to what they have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

On which contending teams would Urias be an upgrade to what they have?

Honestly, I don’t think he’s value is only to a contender.

That said, I would have to look but considering 3/4 of the league are contenders for the playoffs, there are definitely teams out there that need IF depth and starters.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Bemorewins said:

Huh???

We didn’t sign Corbin Burnes in the offseason. We traded Joey Ortiz, DL Hall and a draft pick for him.

Tyler Wells is out until late next year after having Tommy John surgery.

For the next 15 years??? Huh? You get 6 full years of team control with any player. My

I meant acquired - it was the offseason. 🤦‍♂️ I think we have new owners now if I’m not mistaken. You can’t assume we won’t sign our best players anymore. Anyhow, I severely doubt Elias will be parting with Holliday, Mayo or Basallo. Our next tier guys are better than most teams top tier guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

On which contending teams would Urias be an upgrade to what they have?

The Dodgers but Friedman recently made a comment to the effect of the Dodgers primarily being interested in acquiring star players vs. marginal upgrades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Warehouse said:

The Dodgers but Friedman recently made a comment to the effect of the Dodgers primarily being interested in acquiring star players vs. marginal upgrades.

Assuming Elias balks at the price, I hope LAD beats NYY for any of Crochet, Skubal and Scott that move as a warmup for beating them for Soto this winter.

Holliday has closed to within 2 wRC of Connor Norby in the counting stat International League MVP chase.     Fair chance trade deadline places Norby into MLB or the PCL next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

On which contending teams would Urias be an upgrade to what they have?

I think you could make a very reasonable argument that he’s better than what the Dodgers, Yankees, Royals, and Pirates have at 3B right now. 

And beyond that, I’d wager he’s a substantial upgrade to what numerous contending teams have as their primary IF utility player. 

One thing that I think has happened a little bit to this fanbase as the talent level has skyrocketed over the last few seasons is that we’ve lost sight of the value of “solid” or even “somewhat below average” players. I think when you’re looking at value gained/lost, the jump from “terrible” to “mostly competent” can be just as important as the jump from “mostly competent” to “good.” Some of these teams have had injuries or incumbent players that have just collapsed — a guy like Urias could absolutely help them, and presumably at very little cost.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Plus Mateo has a real bench role and he has expanded that role because he plays a solid second base.

Urias makes more sense to trade because he should have more value as he is more of an everyday player than Mateo is and there are enough offense starved teams out there where Urias becomes a decent starting player for them.

If your team is starved for offense, the last player you want is Urias.  Or maybe 2nd to last after McCann 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

If your team is starved for offense, the last player you want is Urias.  Or maybe 2nd to last after McCann 

Since April 15, he has a 122 wRC+.

His career wRC+ is 107 and it’s been over 100 every year of his career (including right now) except last year..when it was 99.

Only 9 teams in all of baseball have a wRC+ of 100 or higher at second base and only 11 are 100 or higher at third base.

 

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was very much bothered by the offensive game plan last night. How are they going to use Henry? He likes to operate when the QB is under center and Lamar likes to operate from The shotgun. How will the Ravens adjust to that AND not be predictable? Where were the quick, short passes. Slants, etc…the Chiefs were running that Rice in the middle vs a LBer play all night. Where is that for the Ravens?    I get so tired of the lack of adjustments. It’s like, this is an our game plan and we are staying with it even if it’s not working. 
    • The Os took him because they were seeing through the flaws and saw an immense talent with high upside. But they have to fix the flaws for him to be anything more than an AAAA player. It's really that simple.
    • Nice article.   When the Orioles picked him, I have no doubt that they knew his flaws but still felt his talent was too good to pass up with the #22 slot.  Let's hope he figures it out.   Heck, how many guys drafted at 1/22 make it anyway?
    • Right, he's just been more pitch efficient with the Rays. I just find it interesting that their new teams have found ways to make all of them better initially.  Some believe the Elias regime have some kind of magic fairy dust that makes players better when they come into this organization because of the success of relievers like Perez, Cano, Webb, and Coulombe, but when you see their young pitching prospects getting selected by teams in trades, and then they have better success right away, it does make you wonder. Johnson was almost 26-years old and wasn't allowed to throw 70 pitches in a game and only made it to 5 innings in two of his starts with the Orioles. Why?  I can kinda understand 18-21 year olds being under fairly strict pitching counts, but even the college pitchers are getting put under pretty strict limits when they were throwing 90+ pitches a game in college. I just don't get why the Orioles have taken this route when it's shown no ability to limit injuries or produce major league pitching effectively. I just want to interview Elias and it would probably go like this: Elias: You want answers? Me: I want the truth! Elias: You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men who throw baseballs. Who's gonna do it? You? You, @Frobby? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Johnson and you curse our development staff. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know, that Johnson's development with us, while tragic, probably saved other young pitchers arms. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves those arms! You don't want the truth, because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me protecting those arms. You need me protecting those arms. We use words like "innings limit", "low pitch counts", "4 inning starts". We use these words as the backbone of a baseball life spent defending something. You use them as a punchline on that Orioles Hangout. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very organization that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it! I would rather you just said "thank you", and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a baseball, and try to throw more than 70 pitches in an outing once a week. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to! Me: A little dramatic there Mike. I just think you should let your pitchers throw more pitches and innings once they hit 21 years old. Sheesh! 
    • Right. I think there’s a difference between discussing it and what many are doing.  
    • The only reason I find it interesting is because he’s an ex elite WR and knows how to play the position. 
    • After seeing it more this morning, I think the throw to Likely before that was actually worse. The Flowers play can at least be several different reasons why it didn’t work. The Likely play was just bad football by Lamar. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...