Jump to content

Corbin Burnes 2024


Spy Fox

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, LGOrioles said:

He’s really good but he’s not dominant. He’s pretty much as good as you can be while striking out less than a batter per inning, but unless he starts K’ing more batters again, he’s probably not a truly elite starter. 

Bradish since the 2nd half of last year has been a much better pitcher than Burnes has (in his time with the O’s). 3.3 WAR and 2.34 ERA in 104 IP for Bradish versus 3.2 WAR and 2.71 ERA (coming into tonight) in 149 IP for Burnes. Burnes is still great, but losing Bradish sucks. 

He’s got 28 strike outs in 28 innings over his last 5 starts. You need more than 1 starter so you have room for Burnes and Bradish at the top of the rotation. Besides, most pitchers come back from TJ …but it’s not guaranteed and it usually takes a year before they are back to normal. IMO …Bradish may or may not pitch next season and let’s say they are conservative with him and he comes back in 2026. I’m betting Burnes is the better pitcher in 2026.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

There's no way I go more than three years for Burnes. I haven't looked at the free agent market, but maybe the Orioles go after another pitcher who won't be as costly or trade for one.

I think Elias has been fairly clear that the Orioles don’t play in the $200MM+ pitching market.  I think Burnes gets $250MM+ with opt-outs.  I don’t think resigning Burnes has ever really been a consideration for Elias.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

There's no way I go more than three years for Burnes. I haven't looked at the free agent market, but maybe the Orioles go after another pitcher who won't be as costly or trade for one.

The higher quality yet maybe less costly free agents are all either old (Scherezer, Verlander, Morton, Eovaldi), attempting to rebound from major injuries (Fried, Buhler, Bieber -- and of course John Means), or some combination of the two (Kershaw).  

Two high end free agents that will be costly should they choose to opt out of current contracts are Blake Snell and Gerrit Cole.  I'm thinking Cole might not opt out while Snell almost certainly will.  

There are several players with options and opt outs and other clauses who may or may not become available -- such as Jordan Montgomery.

No one else close to Burnes' level will be available as a free agent, unless you think Jack Flaherty is an ace again all of a sudden.  There will be some decent middle to back end starter types available like Jose Quintana, Anthony DeSclafini, Michael Lorenzen or Kyle Gibson.

High end starting pitching will cost a lot this offseason --- whether in dollars or prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, EddeeEddee said:

The higher quality yet maybe less costly free agents are all either old (Scherezer, Verlander, Morton, Eovaldi), attempting to rebound from major injuries (Fried, Buhler, Bieber -- and of course John Means), or some combination of the two (Kershaw).  

Two high end free agents that will be costly should they choose to opt out of current contracts are Blake Snell and Gerrit Cole.  I'm thinking Cole might not opt out while Snell almost certainly will.  

There are several players with options and opt outs and other clauses who may or may not become available -- such as Jordan Montgomery.

No one else close to Burnes' level will be available as a free agent, unless you think Jack Flaherty is an ace again all of a sudden.  There will be some decent middle to back end starter types available like Jose Quintana, Anthony DeSclafini, Michael Lorenzen or Kyle Gibson.

High end starting pitching will cost a lot this offseason --- whether in dollars or prospects.

Cole contract is such that NYY can add additional year on the end and therefore cannot opt-out this offseason.  And Montgomery may not choose to opt-out given performance this season.  I think Snell for sure opt-outs, and like last offseason, it will be interesting to see how Boras plays both Snell and Burnes…certainly MO has been to wait and delay thru offseason.

I actually don’t mind going shorter term deal for Kikuchi.  And then hope Bradish is ready for postseason ball.

Edited by Say O!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I would like Fried as a cheaper alternative to Burnes.  Do you think he could be signed for around 5 years/$150 mill?  I'm thinking Burnes is going to command $300 mill contract and Elias isn't going there. 

Burnes won’t get 300 million.  Teams are going to start pushing back against these long contracts as they just don’t work unless you are super spender.  I think he gets six years in 210 million to 7 years at 250 as a max offer.  Fried probably gets 5- for 150 maybe 6 175.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PitcherList's Nick Pollack had this sticky stuff split observation on the cutter since the 2021 season for the ages.    Who knows if Alex Cora had a cue for his bats, and we'll see him against the Astros next for more data.

For your fantasy squads, note that his cutter went 0/40 whiffs. Sticky stuff helped in 2021, but that pitch held a 17%+ SwStr in 2021. It’s down to 9% this year. Recalibrate your idea of Burnes.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

MOFW

Don’t know what this means except I’m sure there is some profanity involved. He has a bad outing .. what do you expect him to say. Hey …how about my manager kept me in too long and the cost was a lost game? Can’t do that he’s a professional. I think Burnes ends up 5-6 x $30. If that’s the case Rubenstein should be all in. I just don’t see anyone going 200 plus. I think the decreased K/9 could work in the Orioles favor. And he’s proven he can get guys out without being K Reliant. I’ll take a sub 3 era (before the other night) for the next 3-5 years. He’s solid, a bulldog , and a good guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, bpilktree67 said:

Burnes won’t get 300 million.  Teams are going to start pushing back against these long contracts as they just don’t work unless you are super spender.  I think he gets six years in 210 million to 7 years at 250 as a max offer.  Fried probably gets 5- for 150 maybe 6 175.

I think he gets $224M for 7 years ($32MM AAV) with a club option for 8th year at $35MM.  Opt out after 4 years that can be voided if club guarantees 8th year.

Something like that.  I don’t think Elias goes for that but it might make sense for Mets or Red Sox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Warehouse said:

I think he gets $224M for 7 years ($32MM AAV) with a club option for 8th year at $35MM.  Opt out after 4 years that can be voided if club guarantees 8th year.

Something like that.  I don’t think Elias goes for that but it might make sense for Mets or Red Sox.

If Burnes gets that on the free agent market you take the comp pick and let him walk. The back half of that contract is going to look really ugly as Burnes declines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think it's because Pivetta has reverse splits this year. Now, do you value his career numbers or this year...I'm not sure. But maybe SIGBOT cares about this year more maybe because of pitch mix/effectiveness can vary year to year. Who knows. Against righties: .279/.311/.514 - .825 OPS Lefties: .187/.251/.365 - .616 OPS  
    • So he has the same first 6 hitters and plays Rivera over Mayo who has hit better and is a much better defender along with playing Slater in the outfield which gives us better defense over Santander and takes McCann a light hitting catcher out of the game.  So he made an upgrade at 3rd base with how both guys are playing and flipped Slater for McCann and thus makes it an awful lineup.  It makes me laugh how much people get upset about nothing.  
    • Coulombe doesn't have righty/lefty splits. It's why he is so damn good.  Akin doesn't have righty/lefty splits this year, and he didn't last year but he was awful/hurt. He definitely did in 2022. But he stinks with runners on and in high leverage situations. Soto is super inconsistent and when he blows up he's awful. Last year he stunk against righties, but was excellent against lefties. I reckon they want him to get back to that. To me, the pecking order would be this: Coulombe and Perez for high leverage situations Akin only in for fresh innings and to give 1-2 IP. Soto I just don't trust. He had a nice stretch there for a minute, but in the end...he was pitching in mostly low leverage situations. 
    • Last night's lineup was Hyde first decent lineup in a long time, but tonight's lineup is another abysmal one from him. If Elias was going to make a dumpster dive trade for Austin Slater, I can somewhat see the logic behind strictly using Slater as a platoon player. But I definitely don't understand giving him more starts against righties. What both Elias and Hyde are saying by giving Slater opportunities is, "We don't care about stats or splits, we have a good feeling about this guy." That's it, and that's terrible roster management.  Slater has extreme favorable career splits against lefties, and the Elias apologists on this board pointed to Slater being a good platoon matchup hitter against lefties, saying he makes some sense if you believe his struggles against lefties this season would normalize closer to his career line. Yet Slater is still actually hitting better against righties this season. Ultimately, in the end, Slater is a .600 OPS hitter overall this season. Which makes him unplayable to any competent manager or GM. There was a reason Slater was available at the trade deadline for cash considerations. And it's because he sucks. Emmanuel Rivera, meanwhile, has a .597 OPS this season. Sorry, not even a gold glove 3B is worth rostering with that kind of bat. Yet Hyde continues to give Rivera at bats over a top 10 prospect who should be getting as many starts as possible to get comfortable. Unbelievable.  Slater and Rivera could each hit a home run tonight, and that still wouldn't change how terrible they are or that it's bad lineup optimization to start both of these bums. 
    • Right. Let's just be honest and say that he did a great job building the farm system through the Houston "tank" philosophy, but now must prove he can be good at building the MLB product. But yes, this trade looks dreadful at the moment. 
    • I still expect him to be a very good player.   However, I was hoping for 70 grade bat-to-ball and instead he had a 21.8% in-zone whiff % at Norfolk.  His Tides OPS was powered by a 20% walk rate which won’t stick at the big league level.  I was hoping for solid SS defense and plus 2B defense, but it looks more like solid at 2B and maybe not viable at SS. Going into the season I was hoping for perennial MVP candidate and now have tempered my outlook to occasional All-Star.  I recognize he is 20 but so are the other Jackson’s.
    • Billy Rowell.  Should be capping off a hall of fame career by now but he’s smoking pot and collecting shopping carts at a Food Lion in Jersey.  Jokes aside, De Leon was a guy I had hopes for headed into the season cause we’re thin with pitching.  I thought Beavers was going to be a solid prospect. Mayo for looking completely lost when arriving in Baltimore. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...