Jump to content

Craig Kimbrel 2024


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

It won’t. 

We really don't have a choice. This was something that had to be addressed in the offseason. We have to try to survive until we can add around the deadline.

Of course this is not an outcome that should come as a surprise. Who thought nothing could go wrong in replacing Bautista (arguably the game's best) with a once great now very suspect Kimbrel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Never too early for an overpay lol

 

I don't see many if any teams punting on their season on April 28th. It just doesn't happen. Name the last significant trade that happened in April or May for that matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bemorewins said:

We really don't have a choice. This was something that had to be addressed in the offseason. We have to try to survive until we can add around the deadline.

Of course this is not an outcome that should come as a surprise. Who thought nothing could go wrong in replacing Bautista (arguably the game's best) with a once great now very suspect Kimbrel?

It's not just the closer.

You also have a pen full of guys with not overwhelming stuff, when that is the standard.  You also don't have much in the way of guys with options so it's harder to rotate guys in and out to limit wear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's not just the closer.

You also have a pen full of guys with not overwhelming stuff, when that is the standard.  You also don't have much in the way of guys with options so it's harder to rotate guys in and out to limit wear.

I agree with you!

There is a philosophy in the modern game that says that most relievers are interchangeable and you should not use money/capital/investment on them because of how "easy" they are to find. The problem for us is that it appears that we have gone to the trash heap/waiver wire/left over menu, one too many times.

We are going to need more than one reliever to truly fixe the bp problem. Hopefully Suarez can go down there and be effective and we can survive until deadline time where we can get someone else who is effective. On a team like this we just can't afford the luxury of carrying a Kimbrel. He's already breaking down from overuse and it's only APRIL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bemorewins said:

I agree with you!

There is a philosophy in the modern game that says that most relievers are interchangeable and you should not use money/capital/investment on them because of how "easy" they are to find. The problem for us is that it appears that we have gone to the trash heap/waiver wire/left over menu, one too many times.

We are going to need more than one reliever to truly fixe the bp problem. Hopefully Suarez can go down there and be effective and we can survive until deadline time where we can get someone else who is effective. On a team like this we just can't afford the luxury of carrying a Kimbrel. He's already breaking down from overuse and it's only APRIL!

But if they are fungible you don't stack your pen with guys you can send down.

Ideally you can send a guy down and see if a Povich type can get the job done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

But if they are fungible you don't stack your pen with guys you can send down.

Ideally you can send a guy down and see if a Povich type can get the job done.

I hope that the team is open to any possible solutions because I think that it has become pretty clear after almost a month, the bullpen is really the only weakness on the team and the guys that we have out there now are not likely to be the answer as a group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using Kimbrel today put him on a 78 game pace. The only time he worked in more games was when he was 23-years old and he worked 79. Last year he did pitch on 71 games, but was not a closer all last year.

Sounds like a lot to ask a 36-year old pitcher to throw in this many games, all in high leverage situations. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

we gave up Eduardo Rodrigue

Great that we are seeing the proof in April that Kimbrel is  not a closer on a playoff/championship team.

Now we have all year to figure out who is going to be our closer  in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spleen1015 said:

Well no they didn't. They took him out after he gave up the HR. They claimed injury to take him out after 2 batters. If you're gonna argue, at least have the details right.

He threw one ball to the third batter. I see Statcast is incorrect and shows Dillon Tate as throwing that 4-seamer pitch but it was Kimbrel's.

image.png.b78a7f0d3019e064966612a7317c3912.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

I agree with you!

There is a philosophy in the modern game that says that most relievers are interchangeable and you should not use money/capital/investment on them because of how "easy" they are to find. The problem for us is that it appears that we have gone to the trash heap/waiver wire/left over menu, one too many times.

We are going to need more than one reliever to truly fixe the bp problem. Hopefully Suarez can go down there and be effective and we can survive until deadline time where we can get someone else who is effective. On a team like this we just can't afford the luxury of carrying a Kimbrel. He's already breaking down from overuse and it's only APRIL!

Injuries happen anytime. It may be a good part of the season to rest him while he has been overworked. 
 

the timing of Means, Bradish and potentially Wells can be a season long blessing for the playoff potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

They need to give up prospects for an actual closer . .. we gave up Eduardo Rodriguez for Andrew Miller.. something similar 

Yeah if we need to make a trade then I am all for that.   I was strictly talking in house options.

 

Miller was perhaps the best relief pitcher I have ever seen in his time with the O's.  Almost completely untouchable.  I cringed when the O's never made an attempt to resign him.   I said  the same about Nelson Cruz and got crucified for that.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • WBALs Blair Young likes our chances https://www.wbaltv.com/article/do-orioles-have-chance-sign-free-agent-pitcher-corbin-burnes/62512129
    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...