Jump to content

Austin Hays 2024


ShoelesJoe

Recommended Posts

On 4/18/2024 at 2:36 PM, Frobby said:

Re the “carry over from last year” argument, I was thinking today about Luke Scott in 2009-10.   In 2009, Scott had a .957 OPS at the all star break, but slumped horribly after that and posted a .667 the rest of that season.  Then he had a horrible first 5 weeks in 2010, and as of May 4, had a .604 OPS.  We were hearing all the exact same arguments about how Scott’s bad start was tied to his poor finish in 2009 and spelled long term doom.  Zap - Scott then posted a .964 OPS for the rest of the season.   

I'm not saying this will happen with Hays, but it’s an example of why I don’t buy the “carry over” argument.  
 

Counter: Hays really wasn’t that good in the 1st half last year either. He produced, but was aided by a .389 BABIP in the 1st half, that returned to something closer to his career average (.303) in the second half (.288). 
 

Not to say this is who he is now, but I’d say he’s a slightly below average hitter overall who is useful as a platoon partner on this team. The talk about sending him down is silly, but I think Hyde now rightly sees he’s not an every day player given our other options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, waroriole said:

Counter: Hays really wasn’t that good in the 1st half last year either. He produced, but was aided by a .389 BABIP in the 1st half, that returned to something closer to his career average (.303) in the second half (.288). 
 

Not to say this is who he is now, but I’d say he’s a slightly below average hitter overall who is useful as a platoon partner on this team. The talk about sending him down is silly, but I think Hyde now rightly sees he’s not an every day player given our other options. 

He’s certainly not an everyday player if Cowser is going to outhit him.   I just want to see Hays get his rate stats up in his normal range, and if Cowser continues to outhit that, God bless him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like there's a chance he goes on IL today with a calf strain, though he has avoided the IL in recent years when similarly banged up. 

Pretty curious who they would bring up. Kjerstad is most deserving but not really a good 1:1 for Hays' RH bat + defense combo. McKenna is an option. Burdick. Norby maybe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

I’ve said before …the low OBP guys will be weeded out as the better players come up. Hays was never going to be long term. 

I think this is part of what is going on.  Hays in my opinion is pushing a bit because he wants to stay and keep playing.  In the off season he announced he would love to sign an extension.  

He ia a player I have always liked and admired.  He was a bright light on some dark teams without much talent.  He played all out when there wasn't much to play for except pride.

However, the tide is rising and it would appear guys like Hays will be replaced.  Whether he continues as a 4th OF guy or not IDK.  I hope he comes out of it and plays his best.  But I still expect Cowser to get the most abs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on Hyde's comments and tone in the post game presser, it kind of sounded like an IL decision could be coming today. I doubt they want to go into this series short a player if he is going to be unavailable today and possibly Wednesday. 

I wonder if they flew a RH bat out west to be ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Based on Hyde's comments and tone in the post game presser, it kind of sounded like an IL decision could be coming today. I doubt they want to go into this series short a player if he is going to be unavailable today and possibly Wednesday. 

I wonder if they flew a RH bat out west to be ready.

Hyde's tone was definitely "it doesn't look good but I'm trying to not say that right now". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Even worse.

Why wouldn’t they ship a real player out there?

Gotta be another move coming tomorrow, right? Odd they wouldn’t be more prepared and got Stowers or Kjerstad out there today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

Bringing Banuelos up. Prob was on taxi squad. Gotta make a real move tomorrow, don’t you? Burdick or McKenna come on down!

It isn't Burdick, he just got DFA'd to bring up Banuelos. Too bad the Tides are off tonight, so we can't use their lineup as evidence of who is coming up. Clearly we need someone on the ground at the Norfolk International Airport!

Edited by MurphDogg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Think of my red arrow as not as much against this post but more of a lifetime achievement award.  😀
    • This might explain the Orioles clear change in approach.  If you see a pitch you like on the first pitch take a big fat rip at it.  League average SLG is .550 and the O's are at .700.  So there's some analytical wisdom behind going up and hacking.
    • I can't find the article right now, but I recall reading a while back that there was some evidence that hitting tons of home runs correlates with beating your pythagorean expectation.  That's one of the reasons why the early-mid 2010s Orioles teams with prime Chris Davis frequently beat our expected win totals.  Since we're at or close to the stabilization rate for a lot of HR/power numbers I don't think the conclusion here is that our style of play is unsustainable.   Also, offense around the league is in the absolute gutter, so the runs we're able to score are pretty meaningful.
    • Then again, a game with all three of them homering would be sweet! (Bonus question: which outcome is more likely?)
    • I appreciate that he’s not flipping coins, and I know he has a reason for what he does, but a lot of the time, his reasoning is objectively bad. And that’s not really a source of debate. Just like Buck had a reason for saving Britton…but it was a really bad reason. any opinion, by definition, is debatable. A individual decision can be objectively good or bad whether or not it actually succeeds. Overall, most of the time we can give him the benefit of the doubt, but there have been lots of glaring bad decisions. I’ve mentioned Ned Yost. Even the folks at Royals review thought he was an idiot, but he had a splendid team that worked really well for a couple seasons.  
    • He's young and has a very boisterous personality. This funk literally started the day he was crowned player of the week. He's trying too hard and pressing to get back to / repeat that performance.  Another learning experience. Hopefully he locks in soon and levels that mentality out. I also think Jackson being sent down has probably made him feel pressured as well. They seemed to be pretty close. The culmination of those things just screams trying too hard to me 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...