Jump to content

David Rubenstein 2024


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bemorewins said:

I agree in that I would be over the moon to extend Gunnar and hope that they do everything that they can. But based on past history Boras usually does not play ball. 

That's why I wanted to lock him up before he moved to Boras.  😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

That's why I wanted to lock him up before he moved to Boras.  😉

I'm not sure that extension were a possibility under John Angelos. I don't think that he believed in them or wanted to commit to that kind of longer term spending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bemorewins said:

I'm not sure that extension were a possibility under John Angelos. I don't think that he believed in them or wanted to commit to that kind of longer term spending.

It was a callback to me wanting to give Gunnar a 10 year deal and promote him to the majors back in 2021.

He switched to Boras in Jan 2022.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It was a callback to me wanting to give Gunnar a 10 year deal and promote him to the majors back in 2021.

He switched to Boras in Jan 2022.

You were definitely right on that and maybe Elias agreed with you. But I don't think that there was any convincing John Angelos of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, emmett16 said:

Rays have not won much. They havnt been dominant.  They’ve been a solid team with a crap stadium that’s very far away from their fan base.  Located somewhere else, they’d have solid attendance.  
 

The A’s on the other hand are a bad example for your argument.  After a dominant 70s (with titles) from 1981-1993 they were one of the most popular teams in the country and never averaged less than 11th in the league in attendance (finishing 2nd twice, 3rd twice, and 4th twice) while making it to 3 WS & winning 2.  

I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below)

Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank
2003 FLA 25
2004 BOS 2
2005 CWS 13
2006 STL 11
2007 BOS 2
2008 PHI 12
2009 NYY 1
2010 SF 10
2011 STL 11
2012 SF 8
2013 BOS 4
2014 SF 7
2015 KC 16
2016 CHC 14
2017 HOU 18
2018 BOS 1
2019 WAS 7
2020 LAD 2
2021 ATL 13
2022 HOU 11
2023 TEX

9

 

Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league:

Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season.

KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since.

Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.

 

The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

And they got a ring.

And extended Stras.

And paid Scherzer, and Zimmerman, and Corbin, and Werth.   They didn’t all work out, but nobody could say the Nats didn’t spend to put a winning team on the field during their run.  The run basically ended because Stras II and Corbin blew up in their face.   But there’s always 2019.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say it's just a thrill to see an owner so jacked to be at games and having fun with his toy.  Rubes was out after the game today throwing shirt after shirt to happy fans.  Such a nice thing to do and you could tell he was enjoying doing it.  I'm so happy that this team we have growing here is growing with this guy as the owner.  He seems very genuine in all he does.  Go Rubes!

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, deward said:

I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below)

Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank
2003 FLA 25
2004 BOS 2
2005 CWS 13
2006 STL 11
2007 BOS 2
2008 PHI 12
2009 NYY 1
2010 SF 10
2011 STL 11
2012 SF 8
2013 BOS 4
2014 SF 7
2015 KC 16
2016 CHC 14
2017 HOU 18
2018 BOS 1
2019 WAS 7
2020 LAD 2
2021 ATL 13
2022 HOU 11
2023 TEX

9

 

Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league:

Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season.

KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since.

Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.

 

The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.

You could not have stated things any better than you did!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, drjohnnyfever1 said:

I have to say it's just a thrill to see an owner so jacked to be at games and having fun with his toy.  Rubes was out after the game today throwing shirt after shirt to happy fans.  Such a nice thing to do and you could tell he was enjoying doing it.  I'm so happy that this team we have growing here is growing with this guy as the owner.  He seems very genuine in all he does.  Go Rubes!

He might need to ice his arm after all the hats and shirts he threw today.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Hasn't managed to screw up yet.

So yes. 

Can’t wait for this offseason where people are going to expect him to spend money based on nothing other than his last name isn’t Angelos. 
 

Should be interesting. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

So yes. 

Can’t wait for this offseason where people are going to expect him to spend money based on nothing other than his last name isn’t Angelos. 
 

Should be interesting. 

I think some folks here would complain about payroll stuff even if we spent like the Dodgers or Yanks.

It ain’t Hot Stove at the Hangout if people aren’t whining about grabbing various high profile FA or extending everyone. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...