Jump to content

Time Gunnar's triple


Frobby

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's highlights.  It isn't meant to be used as a scouting tool.

Maybe they could put a disclaimer somewhere.

Yeah I'm just coming from a place of working at myriad publications--both hard news and not--where publishing edited content without a disclaimer would get you fired. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Remember The Alomar said:

Yeah I'm just coming from a place of working at myriad publications--both hard news and not--where publishing edited content without a disclaimer would get you fired. 

One time the Times Picayune was doing a story about a project I was working on. The photographer was  taking action shots of me and I asked if moving to another position would be a better shot. He asked: “would you have done that if I wasn’t here?” I said no, not really. He said “No way! I can’t influence anything!”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Chavez Ravine said:

One time the Times Picayune was doing a story about a project I was working on. The photographer was  taking action shots of me and I asked if moving to another position would be a better shot. He asked: “would you have done that if I wasn’t here?” I said no, not really. He said “No way! I can’t influence anything!”

Exactly. He was a very good photog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Malike said:

I just went to the archive and streamed it. I got 10.77.

Was this from the replay of the whole game or from highlights?  I can't tell if that's the case here, but it's possible that the highlights were edited to compress the actual time.

FWIW Statcast has Gunnar at #32 for sprint speed and #21 for running splits overall, so whatever the actual time of the triple, he's one of the fastest players in the ML.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 24fps said:

Was this from the replay of the whole game or from highlights?  I can't tell if that's the case here, but it's possible that the highlights were edited to compress the actual time.

FWIW Statcast has Gunnar at #32 for sprint speed and #21 for running splits overall, so whatever the actual time of the triple, he's one of the fastest players in the ML.

From the whole game. The camera angle didn't show Gunnar going into third base, but the live replay right after stayed on him out of the box the whole way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Malike said:

From the whole game. The camera angle didn't show Gunnar going into third base, but the live replay right after stayed on him out of the box the whole way.

I would trust it then.  Kid's fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Remember The Alomar said:

If this is true, that is wild malpractice. Not that the MLB.com is a journalistic institution, but folks read/watch their production as the record of what actually happened in any given baseball game. 

I'm guessing one of two things is true: either you don't subscribe to mlb.tv, or you're joking when you suggest that the mlb.tv operation might have an ounce of integrity, journalistic or otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Remember The Alomar said:

If this is true, that is wild malpractice. Not that the MLB.com is a journalistic institution, but folks read/watch their production as the record of what actually happened in any given baseball game. 

Highlight reels are fundamentally no different today than newsreels from the 1930's.  They're entertainment products based in reality but not enslaved to it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing about this play was the ball wasn’t in the air long.  No temptation for the batter to follow the flight of the ball.  A good time to 3B is largely about getting a good jump right out of the box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

Gunnar Henderson triples (3) on a ground ball to right fielder Jo Adell. | 04/22/2024 | MLB.com

Do me a favor and time this, starting with contact until Gunnar hits 3B.   I've done it three times and came up with 10.73, 10.79 and 10.81 seconds.   Tell me what you get.   

So far as I'm aware, the fastest triples of the Statcast era were 10.75 seconds, by Bryan Buxton and Corbin Carroll.

No one in the MLB is close to Buxton's speed on triples - Bring Me The News

D-backs rookie Corbin Carroll paces fastest home-to-3rd time since 2020 (arizonasports.com)

His times are one thing...but his intensity and daring make him a very dangerous base runner..though he does get picked off once in a while..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hutchead said:

I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.

Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Remember The Alomar said:

If this is true, that is wild malpractice. Not that the MLB.com is a journalistic institution, but folks read/watch their production as the record of what actually happened in any given baseball game. 

You should totally sue them. What gall they have to kinda, sorta imply that their baseball replays are accurate to the tenths of a second when they might not actually be that. That's exactly what leads to distrust of all institutions, chaos, revolution, and then we're living in some kind of post-apocalyptic hellscape, boiling our own shoes for the meager nutrition in the leather.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm lost for words about why Rutschman struggled, other than as I've long said he's a catcher and you're not going to get a MOO monster bat playing 110 games behind the plate- but the overall outcome of the team was within what I thought was reasonable, if a bit on the low end. Regarding the depth, Holliday and Mayo are more talented than Urias, but if we had gotten rid of Urias, Mateo, and Mountcastle to hand them spots, this team would have been worse for it, and maybe not even make the playoffs. Urias is good.  Mountcastle is good.  They're not "everyday" players according to your definition, but we have exactly one of those guys.  That doesn't mean every one else is " not good." I wouldn't be surprised to see all three back next year.  I wouldn't be surprised if they moved on from 2-3 of them.  Though I think the former is far wiser than the latter, though it depends on a lot of other things.
    • My post is coming off the wrong way.  The OP I quoted seemed like you were “lost for words” about why the team struggled the way they did. All I’m saying is I think you are like that because you didn’t see the scenarios where this much of a drop off from last year was going to happen. And btw, the depth (to me at least) wasn’t a good thing.  Depth is good when the players are good. If not, they are just guys blocking better talent.
    • But we have no idea who told her or of the info is good. She has given no reason to believe her. Im sure someone told her something but im not sure she smart enough to be able to tell the difference between good info and bad info.
    • I'm a big fan.  It doesn't mean I have sources in the clubhouse. Do we have any idea who her sources are?  Does she have any kind of track record of having reliable sources?
    • I don't know who this woman is and I don't do Twitter. And this is what I touched on in the other thread: I don't know what the best path forward is b/c I don't know exactly what the problem is. I don't think Hyde needs to go, but if this is true- and I have no idea if it is or not- he should be gone. The talk of veteran leaders brings questions.  What was insufficient of the leadership of Satandaner, Mullins, Burnes, and Kimbrel?  
    • Sig for me is notably rigorous trying to combat this.    I feel pretty sure he had a say in crafting his very geeky title, a reflection of his personal brand. We'll see how it goes here if it becomes recommending Adam Frazier and Kyle Gibson as correct for the roster once again.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...