Jump to content

The 2024 Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Bemorewins said:

Elias will be uber cautious/extremely conservative as always, so we don’t need to worry about that.

However, I don’t agree that we should be as dogmatic about that list of 3. If we have a chance to acquire a player/piece who is the last piece to the championship puzzle AND can help us for future seasons. I would be open to surrendering one of Basallo or Mayo.

If in some wild timeline we actually trade for Mason Miller, that trade almost by definition would include Basallo or Mayo. 

But highly doubtful he even is traded much less Elias agrees to what it would take. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Pete Fairbanks could be an interesting option. The Rays are the type of club that is less likely to be adverse to trading in-division, and traded with the Orioles previously in the 3-team Mancini deal. 

Fairbanks is under contract for 2025 with an option for 2026, so a bit more than a rental. His velo looks a little down this year, his numbers have slipped a bit and he’s had injury issues in the past, so the Rays may see it as prudent to try to cash in at the trade deadline if this looks like a lost year for them.

Meanwhile for the Orioles, there are only so many high octane RPs that will even be available, and when Fairbanks is right he’s that unhittable type shutdown RP that they’re lacking.

Fairbanks is good but his FB velo is down almost 2 MPH this year which is concerning. His FB whiff rate is also down from 30% last year to 19% this year. It’s still a good pitch but the velo decline along with the whiff rate (which had been 31% from 2020-2022 is well) could be an ongoing concern. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, interloper said:

What is the most you'd give up for Tanner Scott? 

Nothing. Don’t want him. We need a very good, reliable piece to anchor the back end of the bullpen.

Scott is more of a gamble. I don’t want to gamble with our chances at a World Series. The rest of the roster deserves better than that. 

Elias tried that last year with Flaherty and Fuji. And we saw how useful they both were in October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, G54377 said:

Both, although he's most likely traded. Or at least, that's probably the route we need to take. Shipping him out for 1/2 season of a guy with a 1.25 WHIP and 3.77 FIP doesn't sound like a good plan to me. 

His season numbers are still heavily skewed by a bad April. He had a very good May and it’s continuing into June.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

Nothing. Don’t want him. We need a very good, reliable piece to anchor the back end of the bullpen.

Scott is more of a gamble. I don’t want to gamble with our chances at a World Series. The rest of the roster deserves better than that. 

Elias tried that last year with Flaherty and Fuji. And we saw how useful they both were in October.

While I understand this view of Scott completely, the numbers he's got right now are anything but a crapshoot. No comparison to Fuji whatsoever. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to come to terms with the reality that if we play KC in the AL Wild Card Series that we will face Ragans in Game 1, and possibly one of Snell/Montgomery/Luzardo in Game 2. They could come into OPACY and follow the same strategy the Rangers did last year. 

If we get past them the Yankees already have Cortez and Rodon. They likely will get one of Snell/Luazardo/Montgomery themselves. 

Meaning, JD Martinez, is the vet RH playoff tested bat we need. He’s not a long term piece, but a very valuable matchup piece for the playoffs. Gotta think if we don’t get him, that the Royals might. 

I don’t want to lose in the first rd to KC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

Nothing. Don’t want him. We need a very good, reliable piece to anchor the back end of the bullpen.

Scott is more of a gamble. I don’t want to gamble with our chances at a World Series. The rest of the roster deserves better than that. 

Elias tried that last year with Flaherty and Fuji. And we saw how useful they both were in October.

He hasn't allowed a run in his last 12 appearances. He hasn't allowed an earned run in his past 18 appearances.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's big gaps between Fuji, Tanner Scott, and an established shut down closer. We shouldn't overpay for someone like Tanner Scott. If we can get him for appropriate value, sure let's do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We need to come to terms with the reality that if we play KC in the AL Wild Card Series that we will face Ragans in Game 1, and possibly one of Snell/Montgomery/Luzardo in Game 2. They could come into OPACY and follow the same strategy the Rangers did last year. 

If we get past them the Yankees already have Cortez and Rodon. They likely will get one of Snell/Luazardo/Montgomery themselves. 

Meaning, JD Martinez, is the vet RH playoff tested bat we need. He’s not a long term piece, but a very valuable matchup piece for the playoffs. Gotta think if we don’t get him, that the Royals might. 

I don’t want to lose in the first rd to KC. 

We have the 2nd best OPS (.805) in the league vs LHP and it's a pretty big gap to 3rd.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We need to come to terms with the reality that if we play KC in the AL Wild Card Series that we will face Ragans in Game 1, and possibly one of Snell/Montgomery/Luzardo in Game 2. They could come into OPACY and follow the same strategy the Rangers did last year. 

If we get past them the Yankees already have Cortez and Rodon. They likely will get one of Snell/Luazardo/Montgomery themselves. 

Meaning, JD Martinez, is the vet RH playoff tested bat we need. He’s not a long term piece, but a very valuable matchup piece for the playoffs. Gotta think if we don’t get him, that the Royals might. 

I don’t want to lose in the first rd to KC. 

Don’t forget about Mayo in this equation. He could be a DH.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, G54377 said:

There's big gaps between Fuji, Tanner Scott, and an established shut down closer. We shouldn't overpay for someone like Tanner Scott. If we can get him for appropriate value, sure let's do it. 

The gap is much bigger between Fuji and Scott than it is between Scott and an elite shutdown closer.

The only difference is, Scott is realistically attainable and an elite closer is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DirtyBird said:

The gap is much bigger between Fuji and Scott than it is between Scott and an elite shutdown closer.

The only difference is, Scott is realistically attainable and an elite closer is not.

True about the gap yea. We really don't know who's going to be available right now. Scott probably will be. Main point, If I am Elias I am not throwing all my best trade chips in the pot for Tanner Scott. That's just not a guy that's likely to move the needle enough, and it's only for 1/2 a season. If we got him for another year or two that'd be a little different. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, G54377 said:

True about the gap yea. We really don't know who's going to be available right now. Scott probably will be. Main point, If I am Elias I am not throwing all my best trade chips in the pot for Tanner Scott. That's just not a guy that's likely to move the needle enough, and it's only for 1/2 a season. If we got him for another year or two that'd be a little different. 

I think you are overrating Norby as a trade chip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Amparo made it to at least 49 PA with a strikeout but he went down once yesterday so the no K streaks are over.  Felix Amparo just edged out Adriander Mejia for the most PA without striking out.
    • they could also reward batting discipline by forcing pitchers to throw real strikes with at least a robo challenge system
    • Perfect, let’s go get him AND Verlander! 
    • I didn’t catch it myself but someone pointed out that Matthew Etzel did not make the top 45.   That’s either an oversight or just plain ridiculous.
    • You could. But I think that's harder because every player has their own bat they like. Bats aren't, and haven't ever been, subject to the same kind of requirements balls are. The ball is a very specific size and weight and COR, etc. The rules about the bats are basically that they can't be longer than X (something crazy like 48", which nobody has used in a century+), or heavier than Y (again, tailored to deadball or Ruth era batters). I think the pushback from fans and players if they went away from wood would be very substantial. I think much more substantial than the pushback for the pitch clock or other recent changes. Just guessing, but I think it would be easier to convince the world that moving the mound back is a better option. Just moving away from the sound of ball hitting wood bat might spark a revolution. There are no shortage of people who say college baseball isn't real baseball because of aluminum bats (even if they've moved to composite? I don't watch enough college ball to know.) Also, if you're not careful you could get into a college baseball situation where before they got the bats under control teams were scoring like 10 runs a game or more. And I have no idea of the underlying reasons, but in 2023 the median runs/game across all college baseball leagues was nearly seven, which is a level that hasn't been approached in MLB since the 1800s. The ACC averaged 7.5, which makes pre-humidor Coors look like a Camden Yards where every batter is a right-handed pull hitter.
    • I get that McCann’s bat is not ideal in the lineup (on the days that he plays). And Mullins struggled really bad for about 6-7 weeks. And Mateo/Urias are no great shakes themselves. But even with all/each of them getting regular to semi-regular ABs, we have the #1 offense in the sport. Like it literally doesn’t get any better. So how do we “need” another bat. Maybe if Mayo is still here, he comes up at some point and strengthens us even more? But I struggle to understand the idea of us needing more offense, especially when the pitching is this shaky. Do you want Cano (who know looks like he’s lost it) and Perez coming in to try to hold games in the 7th/8th inning only to turn it over to Kimbrel in the 9th in October?  Maybe we defeat SEA/NY and reach a World Series for the first time in over 40 years. How would you like our chances of potentially Ranger Suarez vs Irvin/Kremer/Suarez/Povich for 2 times in a potential 7 game series? Seems like the Phills would have a strong advantage there, no?
    • I'm guessing that without a major technological breakthrough we're getting the 2024 version. Which, in the absence of other information, is his career averages with a bit of age-related decline thrown in. I'm assuming the year-to-year variation we see in his record is mostly random noise overlaid on his basic talent level.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...