Jump to content

Friday 6/7 @ Tampa Bay


86this

Recommended Posts

Just now, Roy Firestone said:

How much longer for Ced?

Today, or in general? I’d say the leash is getting short. Strange, because he was hitting it hard earlier in the week. I was thinking he might break out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Our college coach hated foul ball HRs. He said they often led to strike outs. 

While that's technically correct in non-two-strike counts, it's not like players are hitting them on purpose. 

Edited by Morgan423
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gurgi said:

I am falling out of love with Mullins.  He is a black hole in our lineup.  

I'm with you, though I'm not sure his roster replacement is guaranteed to be any better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, oriolediehard said:

When we win games 10-2 and 11-1 it adds up, losing games 3 or more scoring 2 or less is more losses and runs seem higher when we win big in 1 game.

We have very few wins like that.

I think the run scoring environment is down in baseball and people just haven't adjusted for that.   We lead the majors at a bit over 5 runs per game, and there are only 2 or 3 teams that are scoring that much.   Scoring is down.

So a night like tonight, where we have 4 runs in 6 innings, seems like we aren't hitting well.   But it is actually quite good.

Add that to the general game thread mentality that every time we got a couple innings without scoring it's "sleepwalking", and selective memory, and people start to believe our offense isn't very good.

We have 4 runs in 6 innings and the majority of the comments on our offense have been negative.  A guy who started year as our #5 starter and has allowed 2 runs in 5 innings and is still pitching in the 6th .... yet most of the comments here about his pitching are negative.

In a recent game thread someone posted that they could barely stand to watch our games because of our scoring droughts and other perceived flaws,   And I think we had won 7 of 8 games at the time!!!!!   

The gap between perception and reality in the game thread is enormous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jagwar said:

Really can't be long. 

Who do you replace him with? Cowser has a .580 OPS in May and .330 so far in June. All the bad luck talk is just that, there have been no results for over a month now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • But are we getting 2017 Niko or 2022 Niko?  That is the question.  
    • No. In 2024 they are on the hook for whatever the Mets aren’t paying in 2024.  With half the season left, that number has been reduced in half. No one is trading for Scherzer right now because he just got back from the IL and they will want to see more of him. By the time he’s traded, it will be less than half. 
    • If you were going to run a comprehensive study you'd have to run a correlation between MVP votes and (value metric of your choice) across all teams, then see if the Yanks were different than the average. But even that might be of limited usefulness, because I'd guess the WAR leader has won the MVP less than half the time, perhaps substantially less. It's only been the last 15-20 years that we've had decent, reasonable, consistent ways of combining and comparing different types of production on a common baseline. So even as recently as 2005 MVP voters were left to their own guessing and biases to figure out if a run saved by a pitcher was more or less valuable than a run created by a hitter, or a baserunner or even how (or if) to include fielding. In other words, even if a Yankee beat a more-qualified player in the voting what does that mean in a world where Juan Gonzalez and his three wins out-polls ARod and his nine? How do you pick out the Yankee bias from the "we just don't have/use an objective way to measure value" bias?
    • I read that as Scherzer is owed $43 million this year and that $43 million is spread over his game checks for 2024. I read it as Texas got a $20 million stipend for this year basically.  We’re halfway through the season, so that means he’s owed half of his $43 million. Not half of what’s left to over from his salary and the $20 million stipend. That $20 million stipend seems like it was built in to cover the 1st half of 2024. So he’s owed that 2nd half. Which is $20 million.  We’re not paying him $20 million the rest of the season. 
    • I’d prefer they trade value to get a starter from a team like Seattle. If Seattle hopes to be competitive in the playoffs they will need to find some more offense. 
    • He didn’t execute it last night but Mullins tried to bunt last night. I hope we see him trying to do more of that.  I know teams will try to take it away often but when he has the opportunity to do it, I hope he tries because he’s an accomplished bunter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...