Jump to content

Trade Proposal: Santander for Snell


Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Malike said:

I doubt it, some team will offer him multiple years. He's underrated on this site, almost criminally.

Yes, and that "some team" should be the Baltimore Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, terpoh said:

Kjerstad in LF

Cowser in CF

Kjerstad looks shaky to me in left. We still have Hays and Mullins for one more year each and Stowers and Billy Cook need shots ….Plus Norby if he’s not going to be a 2B

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Malike said:

I doubt it, some team will offer him multiple years. He's underrated on this site, almost criminally.

He’s a fine player, but I don’t think he’s worth $17 million for one year, or whatever the QO is going to be. I think it’s money much better spent on pitching, especially because we’ve got enough outfielders to let him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HowAboutThat said:

He’s a fine player, but I don’t think he’s worth $17 million for one year, or whatever the QO is going to be. I think it’s money much better spent on pitching, especially because we’ve got enough outfielders to let him go.

He's getting a 3 year deal from someone and will be offered a QO.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Kjerstad looks shaky to me in left. We still have Hays and Mullins for one more year each and Stowers and Billy Cook need shots ….Plus Norby if he’s not going to be a 2B

Thats fair regarding Kjerstad's defense in LF. But I am willing to bet he will get better with time and experience. We have all of those guys on the roster right now, so there is no more or less roster crunch than now- thats just a Hyde decision on playing time and it seems he has shifted in that direction already.

Also, theres an offseason of potential movement. I would keep the switch hitter who plays a solid, not spectacular, RF, is beloved in the locker room, and hits for a ton of power.

Edited by terpoh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, terpoh said:

Thats fair regarding Kjerstad's defense in LF. But I am willing to bet he will get better with time and experience. We have all of those guys on the roster right now, so there is no more or less roster crunch than now- thats just a Hyde decision on playing time and it seems he has shifted in that direction already.

Also, theres an offseason of potential movement. I would keep the switch hitter who plays a solid, not spectacular, RF, is beloved in the locker room, and hits for a ton of power.

I’d rather give that $20 million to Burnes or save it to extend Adley or Gunner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HowAboutThat said:

Santander isn’t getting a QO. If he does, he will take it.

I would be fine with that. If we have all of Santander, O'Hearn, Mountcastle, and Hays coming back next year we can always trade one (possibly even Santander). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I’d rather give that $20 million to Burnes or save it to extend Adley or Gunner.

Well, yes. If it was either or. But I see no reason why we shouldnt be able to extend Adley and Gunnar to longer more "lifetime" deals and Tony to a shorter 3 year deal. 

I'm assuming the solution you envision is Cowser in LF, Mullins in CF and Kjerstad in RF? So its a question of Mullins vs Santander. I like Tony's switch hitting versatility- we would be in some trouble vs LHP with Cowser/Mullins/Kjerstad

Edited by terpoh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, HowAboutThat said:

He’s a fine player, but I don’t think he’s worth $17 million for one year, or whatever the QO is going to be. I think it’s money much better spent on pitching, especially because we’ve got enough outfielders to let him go.

He’s certainly good enough of a player at that rate. Unless he completely falls apart, I think some team that’s trying to make a jump would be thrilled to sign him to something like $64M/4 years and slap him right in the middle of their lineup.  A team like the Pirates, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, terpoh said:

Well, yes. If it was either or. But I see no reason why we shouldnt be able to extend Adley and Gunnar to longer more "lifetime" deals and Tony to a shorter 3 year deal. 

I'm assuming the solution you envision is Cowser in LF, Mullins in CF and Kjerstad in RF? So its a question of Mullins vs Santander.

I already mentioned Norby, Stowers, and Billy Cook. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And Mayo and Basallo.

Santander needs to go.

What do either of those guys have to do with Tony? Basallo certainly wont be in the outfield in Baltimore any time soon, and unless I am mistaken Coby Mayo has pretty much played exclusively 3B and 1B more recently. Mayo is easily inserted onto this team with Urias spot. Basallo may be up at some point next year, maybe not. I dont think Elias would rush him as a 20 year old. So if you sign Tony to a 3 year deal and then you have Basallo as a C/1B/DH option in Sept of next year, but mostly starting in 2026 there is no roster crunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Elias overestimated Mayo’s value. A guy who strikes out a lot and has no defense is not a valuable prospect, even if he’s strong as a bear and can hit balls to the moon. I wish had been traded at peak value, and yes, I would be happy to trade Holliday, too, but his value has gone down as well
    • I think it's because Pivetta has reverse splits this year. Now, do you value his career numbers or this year...I'm not sure. But maybe SIGBOT cares about this year more maybe because of pitch mix/effectiveness can vary year to year. Who knows. Against righties: .279/.311/.514 - .825 OPS Lefties: .187/.251/.365 - .616 OPS  
    • So he has the same first 6 hitters and plays Rivera over Mayo who has hit better and is a much better defender along with playing Slater in the outfield which gives us better defense over Santander and takes McCann a light hitting catcher out of the game.  So he made an upgrade at 3rd base with how both guys are playing and flipped Slater for McCann and thus makes it an awful lineup.  It makes me laugh how much people get upset about nothing.  
    • Coulombe doesn't have righty/lefty splits. It's why he is so damn good.  Akin doesn't have righty/lefty splits this year, and he didn't last year but he was awful/hurt. He definitely did in 2022. But he stinks with runners on and in high leverage situations. Soto is super inconsistent and when he blows up he's awful. Last year he stunk against righties, but was excellent against lefties. I reckon they want him to get back to that. To me, the pecking order would be this: Coulombe and Perez for high leverage situations Akin only in for fresh innings and to give 1-2 IP. Soto I just don't trust. He had a nice stretch there for a minute, but in the end...he was pitching in mostly low leverage situations. 
    • Last night's lineup was Hyde first decent lineup in a long time, but tonight's lineup is another abysmal one from him. If Elias was going to make a dumpster dive trade for Austin Slater, I can somewhat see the logic behind strictly using Slater as a platoon player. But I definitely don't understand giving him more starts against righties. What both Elias and Hyde are saying by giving Slater opportunities is, "We don't care about stats or splits, we have a good feeling about this guy." That's it, and that's terrible roster management.  Slater has extreme favorable career splits against lefties, and the Elias apologists on this board pointed to Slater being a good platoon matchup hitter against lefties, saying he makes some sense if you believe his struggles against lefties this season would normalize closer to his career line. Yet Slater is still actually hitting better against righties this season. Ultimately, in the end, Slater is a .600 OPS hitter overall this season. Which makes him unplayable to any competent manager or GM. There was a reason Slater was available at the trade deadline for cash considerations. And it's because he sucks. Emmanuel Rivera, meanwhile, has a .597 OPS this season. Sorry, not even a gold glove 3B is worth rostering with that kind of bat. Yet Hyde continues to give Rivera at bats over a top 10 prospect who should be getting as many starts as possible to get comfortable. Unbelievable.  Slater and Rivera could each hit a home run tonight, and that still wouldn't change how terrible they are or that it's bad lineup optimization to start both of these bums. 
    • Right. Let's just be honest and say that he did a great job building the farm system through the Houston "tank" philosophy, but now must prove he can be good at building the MLB product. But yes, this trade looks dreadful at the moment. 
    • I still expect him to be a very good player.   However, I was hoping for 70 grade bat-to-ball and instead he had a 21.8% in-zone whiff % at Norfolk.  His Tides OPS was powered by a 20% walk rate which won’t stick at the big league level.  I was hoping for solid SS defense and plus 2B defense, but it looks more like solid at 2B and maybe not viable at SS. Going into the season I was hoping for perennial MVP candidate and now have tempered my outlook to occasional All-Star.  I recognize he is 20 but so are the other Jackson’s.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...