Jump to content

A Different Way of Thinking About the Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Greg Pappas said:

@Tony-OH is the go-to person to get a good take on a player's skillset.  Tony, what are your thoughts on Norby at 2B?  Can he be average (or better) at 2B?  If so, that upgrades my view on just how valuable he could be.

I don't think he'll be an average defender at 2B. Is he playable? Maybe. But he'll need to really hit well to make up for his sub par defense. Maybe he can still improve, I don't know, but he's just so inconsistent over there and his range to his right is not good at all. I like him better in the corner outfield positions. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

He definitely isn't an elite prospect. But nobody is trading a Holliday or Basallo type for Fedde or Anderson. Norby should have value to a team in need of a bat. I believe he was a fringe top 100 prospect at one point and I don't think he has done anything to lose value.

He’s got older that about it.  He would be playing in the majors at pretty much every other team at this point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

Scott is such a logical trade that I'm kind of wondering why it hasn't already happened. 

I'm assuming it's because the Marlins want the best deal possible and want to get as many bidders involved as possible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

I have PTSD . Post Tanner Scott derangement. No to him. And he's only a rental anyway. Pass.

I think he can be useful, not as a closer, but as a setup weapon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

Givens says hi. 😉

It isn't the same thing at all.

In one case you trade a guy for something and then bring him back to no cost beyond the salary.

In the other you trade a guy when his value is low and then trade, with the same team, for him back at what is sure to be a higher price.

You think the Marlins would take Jud Fabian for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It isn't the same thing at all.

In one case you trade a guy for something and then bring him back to no cost beyond the salary.

In the other you trade a guy when his value is low and then trade, with the same team, for him back at what is sure to be a higher price.

You think the Marlins would take Jud Fabian for him?

I mean I know, I was just trying to have my little gotcha moment. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Maybe Elias doesn't want to bring back someone he traded away.

I get the same vibe with Harvey. Pure speculation I am guessing there may be clubhouse or coachability issues, otherwise Elias would have kept them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 7/18/2024 at 4:26 PM, Aristotelian said:

Agreed. Stowers is another guy I think could have way more value to other teams than to us. Norby for a starter and Stowers for a bullpen arm are frameworks for deals we can reasonably expect, IMO.

Bumping this thread. It does appear at least so far that Elias's strategy was indeed to use Norby/Stowers on the sell side. I thought we might get a little more than Rogers but appears money and control are still important, even under the new ownership. The question is, now that Norby and Stowers are gone, what do we have left to offer to get a bullpen arm in the next 3+ hours, if Mayo/Basallo/Holliday/Kjerstad are untouchable? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • If you’d rather have Trumbo under any circumstances, well then. God only knows how many extra runs scored because he let a ball fall in front of him, but it was a lot. An out at the plate is only an out, and it may or may not come with RISP, but a missed catch in the OF gives the offense another chance, extends the inning, puts more pressure on the pitcher.  Mullins saved a lot of runs with his defense and speed even when he wasn’t hitting. im not talking about errors, nor am I talking about routine fly balls, but about the extra inches a good defender gets that make the difference between a catch and a non- catch, and that’s important. And no one knows before the game what will be required of the defender. nine guys come to the plate, and if one of them is in the lineup not for his offense, but for what he offers with the glove, that’s fine. The other eight should cover for him. Thats why Kevin Pillar had a successful career.
    • Not sure why you bothered to quote me. I was helping another poster figure out how not important a left fielder is when it comes to defense in the modern game. You don't start a left fielder for defense.
    • Were we on Sunday Night Baseball that Sunday 9/17?    My Google of Rosh Hashanah 2023 said it ended at sundown the Sunday. I'm not Jewish either but I am baseball, and in childhood the Sandy Koufax stories I remembered most were about Yom Kippur. The Google also reminded me Kremer's turn as Texas finished the sweep was just 2 days after October 7th. Let's get a sweep, guys.
    • I don’t care what Slater did before he came to us this season. Just like I didn’t care what Hicks did before he came to us last year.  Since we acquired Slater he has a .707 OPS vs LHP and Cowser has a .500 OPS vs LHP.  It’s a coin flip. If we stick to what we’ve done, then it will be Slater. He hasn’t not started versus a LH SP since we acquired him.  I’m good with him or Cowser. Mullins is a lock. If I had to bet I’d think the lineup will be, 1. Gunnar SS L 2. Westburg 2B R 3. Santa RF S 4. Mounty 1B R 5. Adley DH S 6. Slater LF R 7. Urias 3B R 8. Mullins CF L 9. McCann C R
    • So he pitched on it last season?
    • Without Looking - Do you know who was second in Innings Pitched?  Pretty incredible.
    • Looks like it began on Friday, Sep 15 and ended on Sunday, Sep 17.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...