Jump to content

Akin optioned


bluedog

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, bluedog said:

I don't think I've ever seen a big league club in the heat of a pennant race option their most used and arguably most effective reliever. Anyone else ever remember this happening?

He might have the best numbers but no one, including Hyde, trusts him in a big spot.  He doesn’t deserve to be sent down but none of the other guys deserve to be released either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

He might have the best numbers but no one, including Hyde, trusts him in a big spot.  He doesn’t deserve to be sent down but none of the other guys deserve to be released either.

Hyde didn't seem to be using him in close games...and DEFINITELY not with runners on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Akin was the only guy with an option that they would consider. He'll be back. Soto will take his role for now.

I get the fact he'll be back and that he was the only guy with options. Been watching O's baseball for 45 years and never remembered a situation where a guy leading the bullpen in IPs and WAR and with a sub 1.00 WHIP was sent down.

Not criticizing the O's - was just asking if anyone else remembers this happening before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Akin has mostly been used in non-close games or in fresh innings and usually not late in a game. The Guardians hit lefties better, and we’ve seen Akin struggles with high leverage situations and with runners on. There’s some redundancy now in the pen with Suarez who can actually provide length and isn’t a lefty/righty specialist as well as Soto who is dominant against lefties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, clapdiddy said:

Hyde didn't seem to be using him in close games...and DEFINITELY not with runners on.

Every team needs a couple of relievers who can soak up multiple innings in low to medium leverage spots.  That’s Akin’s main role with the team.  He’s one of only two relievers who’s averaged more than one inning per appearance and he easily leads the bullpen staff in IP.  You absolutely need a guy in that role or you’d completely burn out the higher leverage guys.  

I enjoy Akin because he understands his role.  When he enters a game with a sizable lead, he doesn’t nibble or screw around.   He works super fast and he throws a ton of strikes.

He’s had an excellent year despite a couple of notable bad games, and I’m sorry that circumstances have conspired to force the team to send him down in order to preserve their assets.   I’m sure he’ll be back soon enough.  
 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Every team needs a couple of relievers who can soak up multiple innings in low to medium leverage spots.  That’s Akin’s main role with the team.  He’s one of only two relievers who’s averaged more than one inning per appearance and he easily leads the bullpen staff in IP.  You absolutely need a guy in that role or you’d completely burn out the higher leverage guys.  

I enjoy Akin because he understands his role.  When he enters a game with a sizable lead, he doesn’t nibble or screw around.   He works super fast and he throws a ton of strikes.

He’s had an excellent year despite a couple of notable bad games, and I’m sorry that circumstances have conspired to force the team to send him down in order to preserve their assets.   I’m sure he’ll be back soon enough.  
 

Totally agree with this take.  Some guys are just not good coming into situations with men on.  Akin definitely has value.

I think of Cano in that way (coming in with men on base) as well, though he's not really a multi-inning guy like Akin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

I just don't understand trading for the quantity of players we did when almost all of them had no options available. 

We traded for 2 relief pitchers who can strike guys out.   We have a lot of pitchers on this staff that can get 2 strikes on a guy and then not finish him off.   In the case of Dominguez and Soto, that was a bigger consideration than options.  

Once the playoffs arrive, which we are highly likely to be in, options don't matter.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looked at clutch ratings and Akin is dead last on the team in high leverage situations. But he's the best pitcher on the team in low leverage situations. You need someone to get 2-3 clean innings in a low leverage situation, he's money.

Statistically Cano, Webb and Akin are similar, but Webb is far and away the best on the team (except Coulombe) in high leverage, while he struggles more than Cano or Akin in low leverage. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Has it gotten devalued, or just harder to do?   I would far prefer a .260-.280 average BA to today’s .244.   I do think that one reason BAs are lower is that batters are emphasizing swinging for power.  But the bigger reason is, pitchers have just gotten bettter.  They throw harder, with more spin, and have a wider array of pitches than ever before.  It’s harder and harder to make solid contact, so if you do, be sure to hit it hard.    By the way, I have a simple way to raise batting averages by 10+ points: bring in the robo-umps and eliminate the 12% of called strikes that are actually balls.  Yes, the 4% of called strikes that are actually balls also will go away, but the net advantage to the hitters will be significant.  And the beauty is, you’re not changing the rules of the game or the strike zone.   You’re improving enforcement of the actual strike zone.  Do it!  
    • His career numbers are pretty much as identical as they can get from either side, and his season numbers are not that different either. .837 OPS lefty, .793 OPS righty this year.
    • And the thing is it's not like the Orioles have only been struggling just in September but since about mid June. I'm not sure if Texas or Arizona played like 6 games under 500 as the Orioles have for 3 months but if they did feel free to tell me. 
    • Yeah it's interesting because we thought the run D would struggle and the pass D would be a strength. The run D has been very solid through 2 games. 
    • I’m going straight positive on his potential and his trend was going up before the trade. Jake Flaherty comes to mind, based on IP maxing out before the trade. But Roger’s is more a deception Povich type lefty.    Believe ME is going on bounce back potential with a full season in. This guy could be a #3. This was a glad you can pitch season for Rogers.   As a #567 SP, will take it. I like Stowers off the plate hit capability and that is missing in this lineup to some degree. will be following this for years, hopefully! Norby too, as a natural hitter. We need contact hitters!
    • I don't dislike them at all or I wouldn't be here but I'm not going to pretend everything is fine and dandy like some of you do 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...