Jump to content

If GRod, Coulombe, and Westburg are back by the playoffs...


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

And who is injured.   I don't think we can count on only players getting healthy from here forward.   Unfortunately players will get hurt as well.

That was a point I was going to make.  So I’m not going to worry about the playoff roster now.  Who’s healthy and playing well when the season ends can’t be known now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Brian88 said:

Pitchers

  1. Burnes
  2. Eflin
  3. Grayson
  4. Suarez
  5. Dominguez
  6. Cano
  7. Perez
  8. Coloumbe
  9. Webb
  10. Smith
  11. Kremer
  12. Akin

Hitters

  1. Adley
  2. McCann
  3. Mountcastle
  4. O'Hearn
  5. Holliday
  6. Henderson
  7. Westburg
  8. Urias
  9. Cowser
  10. Mullins
  11. Santander
  12. Slater
  13. Kjerstad
  14. Jimenez/Mayo

I’d strongly consider moving Suarez ahead of Grayson in a best of series. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, joelala said:

I’d strongly consider moving Suarez ahead of Grayson in a best of series. 

I don’t think I would have the guts to do it. That said GRod could be a nice pen piece. He is too good not to be a SP if he is 100% though. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind matchups for who makes the last couple of spots. A team like MIN has a very RH dominant pitching staff. No lefty starters and only 2 lefty pen arms. 
 

Unless they go on a huge run you can pretty much rule out playing HOU in the WC round if we don’t win the division. Obviously won’t be playing NYY either. Looks like MIN/KC/BOS/CLE.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eddie83 said:

I don’t think I would have the guts to do it. That said GRod could be a nice pen piece. He is too good not to be a SP if he is 100% though. 

Too physically talented, absolutely. And in the long run it would be absurd to move him to the pen at this stage in his career. But right now he’s so inefficient with his pitches that I think being able to come in and throw 101-102 for an inning and change paired with his offspeed stuff would be a huge weapon for us. Regroup in the winter and hope the experience makes him even hungrier to hone his command. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • We don’t have a current combo that is ideal. You have to go with the best possible grouping you have.
    • Yep, we're in agreement on the 70 rWAR threshold.  A championship would help Manny's cause, though I'm not sure if that's in the cards for him in the near future.  He needs a big moment on a big stage, too....as silly as that sounds, I do believe it matters in the eyes of some voters. Not to derail, but Whitaker is a guy that belongs in the HoF, too.  I'm not sure why Grich never got serious consideration.
    • I’ve always felt that 70 rWAR was the line between having to justify why someone shouldn’t be in the HOF versus justifying why they should.  In other words, if you’re over 70, there needs to be a reason for you NOT to be in.  There are 70 position players over 70 WAR, and the only ones not in are Bonds, Pujols (not yet eligible), Trout (not yet eligible), Rose, Bill Dahlen, Lou Whitaker, Raffy Palmeiro, Bobby Grich, and Carlos Beltran.  Really, only Dahlen, Whitaker and Grich have no obvious reason why they’re not in.  And I wouldn’t bet against Beltran getting in eventually.  He’s gotten  46% and 57% of the ballots his first two tries.  
    • Recency bias: "Is a common distorting effect within systems of performance appraisal. It refers to the appraiser assessing employee performance, not on work undertaken across the full performance management cycle, but only on recent events or activities that can be readily recalled. Recency bias can be countered by keeping a record of appraisee performance over the full period of work that is being appraised." https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100407676
    • You're right, I shouldn't assume he's a hole. More of an unknown (11 career AB). Still, an outfield of Slater, one unknown, and one hole isn't exactly ideal. I think Mountcastle 1B/Santander RF is pretty clearly preferable to Santander 1B/Kjerstad RF vs LHP when you include defense.
    • I forget which game it was (Fri or Sat) but he also pulled a ball foul down the LF line that nearly snuck inside the pole. So he was close to having 2 HRs in the series
    • I think the "not improving" idea is buoyed by some recency bias. Year over year, we've got Gunnar .814->.910, Westburg .715->.815, Cowser .433->.756. Kjerstad, Mayo, and Holliday haven't found their big league footing, but all spent most of the year at AAA and did better there than they did last year. Milder praise, but still not a given. Rutschman is the only one of the group who categorically took a step back this year.  I do think there's something to be questioned with how several of these guys (Cowser, Holliday, Mayo namely) have not just struggled but been downright awful in their first season of MLB exposure. To me the Holliday/Mayo flops have been the biggest disappointment of the year, or at least right there with the pitching injuries. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...