Jump to content

Cole Irvin to start tomorrow


accinfo

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

Please elaborate on your pick to start tomorrow. 

If Povich is not available, then anyone who is. We have seen enough of Irvin this season. I will be glad if he proves me wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, O's84 said:

Irvin had an ERA of 7.16 in June and July.  There was nothing unjust about his demotion.

Facts, schmacts...  we need story here.  One rich on grit and verteranocity and come from behind wonderfulness.

Besides Irvin's FIP was only 5.64 during that time, considerably better than Burnes' last start - for that matter it's in the same neighborhood as Burnes' last three consecutive starts.  In the race to lose our way to the AL East title, it's clear we still have work to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 24fps said:

Facts, schmacts...  we need story here.  One rich on grit and verteranocity and come from behind wonderfulness.

Besides Irvin's FIP was only 5.64 during that time, considerably better than Burnes' last start - for that matter it's in the same neighborhood as Burnes' last three consecutive starts.  In the race to lose our way to the AL East title, it's clear we still have work to do.

A 5.64 ERA is still awful and did you just try and compare Irvin to Burnes? Burnes has a career ERA+ of 128.   Irvin's career ERA+ is 88.  The track record speaks for itself.  Besides, the stretch from Burnes you are referring to is 15 IP.  Irvin's was 44 IP.  That's nearly triple the amount.

 

 

Edited by O's84
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m kind of interested in seeing Brandon Young, but the timing didn’t work out because he pitched on Sunday.  Povich was recalled even though he’s not available until tomorrow at the earliest.  So, I assume this will be one and done for Irvin and then they’ll insert Povich somewhere?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of Selby, Tate or Smith needs to be optioned for Irvin. Another will need to go for Akin when he is back from paternity leave.

I’m going to guess Selby goes for Irvin today and Tate soaks up some innings today before going for Akin. But Smith could be optioned if they want both Selby and Tate available today.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I’m kind of interested in seeing Brandon Young, but the timing didn’t work out because he pitched on Sunday.  Povich was recalled even though he’s not available until tomorrow at the earliest.  So, I assume this will be one and done for Irvin and then they’ll insert Povich somewhere?    

This could definitely be one and done for Irvin in the rotation, but with the Eflin injury I wonder if they try to put Irvin back in the pen instead of DFA’ing him. I believe he could not reject the outright to AAA after clearing waivers the first time, but now he could now if they DFA him again.

Young and Irvin are really the only SP depth remaining now, and there’s big questions about all of the SP except Burnes, Kremer and Irvin left standing now making it through the rest of the year. Suárez threw a lot over winter ball, Rogers barely pitched last year and is already pushing his career high IP, and Povich and especially Young are still building up innings as young SP (with Young coming off TJS as well). 

I think Young is a much better option than Irvin now, but Irvin is durable if nothing else. Young also had the 40-man roster working against him (although he will need to be added this offseason, so that’s not much of an impediment), but I also wonder if they will be conscious of trying to not use one of Young’s options this year. This year has really emphasized the importance of optionable SP depth and he projects to be one of those depth guys for the next few years. That’s a very marginal difference in value and it doesn’t outweigh trying to have the best team we can put on the field now, but it could be a factor under consideration.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Old school “book” said save for closer until you take the lead in extras when on road.  New school “book” says use closer as soon as there is a walk-off scenario in a tie game.  The rationale is that a tie game is higher leverage than a 1-run lead and you may have a lead when the 10th inning comes around. The problem in this scenario is that it wasn’t a choice between having Seranthony pitch the 9th and Cano pitch the 10th or vice versa.  It was either have Cano pitch the 9th or pull him from the game.  And, other than Seranthony being a little better at striking out lefties, there isn’t a huge gap in talent between the pitchers.  We needed 6 outs to win and we were better off having Cano pitch 3 of the outs even if that meant he was put in an ever so slightly higher leverage scenario than Dominguez. Pulling Cano was a mistake. Hyde made it because he was following the “book” but failed to factor in nuances specific to the situation. I can’t really blame him for pitching to O’Neil. Obviously, you walk him if Holliday makes the preceding play.  It’s not idea to walk the bases loaded there and put the winning run on 2nd - it was really pick your poison.
    • There's a slight difference of payroll and the ability to overcome injuries there.    LA 238.5M Baltimore 108.5M
    • You think that’s a positive response?
    • Whatever the question was, he says he's not answering it and it's a question for the front office. I don't see how that means or implies anything negative. Maybe there is something going on but that quote is not evidence. 
    • Treat players like robots instead of human beings and this is what happens. Elias and Sig are going to learn that the hard way if they're not learning already.
    • It would make sense that they’re not happy with the FO. Down the stretch in September we’re playing struggling rookies and Maton/Rivera, while watching Norby become a big leaguer in Miami. 
    • Just based off of that quote, is there any reason to think some underlying issues are going on. Like I said, maybe not with the clubhouse but maybe the players aren’t happy with the FO?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...