Jump to content

Analytics


speckle69

Recommended Posts

I have been wondering for awhile if analytics could be overwhelming our players. These kids came to the majors as superstars at every level they played; little league through minors. All of a sudden they are bombarded with information changing their swing, stance, the way they may hold the bat, etc. I believe we may be better off backing off on changing these kids and letting they have the fun their use to playing this great game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, casadeozo said:

While I disagree with the premise of the thread, the injuries have zero to do with m why Adley looks lost, Cowser is top 5 in strikeouts, and Holliday looking completely lost.

Injuries probably have something to do with Adley's struggles, and Holliday wouldn't be playing, or not as much as he is, were it not for injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, wildcard said:

With two weeks left in the season Coweer is one of the top  rookies in the AL.    That is pretty hard to deny.

Repeating an irrelevant point doesn’t make it relevant 

back to the discussion of data and and it’s effect on young hitters 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't help but wonder if our hitting coaches basically just do one thing:   preach the launch angle approach that Elias has determined that leads to optimal overall results.   Don't worry about strikeouts.   Emphasis on doing the most damage when you swing (vs just trying to put the ball in play, hit 'em where they ain't, etc).

And that approach, taken as a whole, DOES lead to better overall results, and I believe it IS the correct holistic approach for an organization to take in drafting, developing, and coaching players?

But if it is the only thing our hitting coaches know how to teach, could that also be a problem?    When a batter is in a slump, maybe he should be less concerned with focusing on the amount of damage he does per swing, but jsut with putting the ball in play to make something happen.    Could there be a psychological effect?   Players and ex-players will talk abouit a bloop hit helping them get out of a slump.   Football players will talk about going immediately back to a receiver who drops a ball to boost his confidence and "keep him in the game".

And most "old school" baseball coaches believed in these things, and used them to help guys get out of slumps.   Maybe there is still some wisdom in that approach, not as a primary approach, but to help a guy get his confidence back, start seeing the ball better, etc.   And maybe the guys we hired aren't able to, even temporarily, change what they are telling guys to help them when they are struggling.

Just speculating.   Grasping for answers at the astonishing lack of hitting we are seeing on so many nights.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I can't help but wonder if our hitting coaches basically just do one thing:   preach the launch angle approach that Elias has determined that leads to optimal overall results.   Don't worry about strikeouts.   Emphasis on doing the most damage when you swing (vs just trying to put the ball in play, hit 'em where they ain't, etc).

And that approach, taken as a whole, DOES lead to better overall results, and I believe it IS the correct holistic approach for an organization to take in drafting, developing, and coaching players?

But if it is the only thing our hitting coaches know how to teach, could that also be a problem?    When a batter is in a slump, maybe he should be less concerned with focusing on the amount of damage he does per swing, but jsut with putting the ball in play to make something happen.    Could there be a psychological effect?   Players and ex-players will talk abouit a bloop hit helping them get out of a slump.   Football players will talk about going immediately back to a receiver who drops a ball to boost his confidence and "keep him in the game".

And most "old school" baseball coaches believed in these things, and used them to help guys get out of slumps.   Maybe there is still some wisdom in that approach, not as a primary approach, but to help a guy get his confidence back, start seeing the ball better, etc.   And maybe the guys we hired aren't able to, even temporarily, change what they are telling guys to help them when they are struggling.

Just speculating.   Grasping for answers at the astonishing lack of hitting we are seeing on so many nights.   

Ya I think there is perhaps something to this.

Edgar Martinez took over hitting coach responsibilities a few weeks ago when Servais was let go. Very small sample size but they’ve had some improvement on their beyond anemic offense. He obviously teaches a very old school approach and said something to the effect of “no amount of launch angle can fix a bad swing”

im reminded of watching Cal when I was growing up how often he would change his stance when he was in a bit of a slump. Now that he has a partial ownership stake in the team, it may make some sense to lean on him for input. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, casadeozo said:

Ya I think there is perhaps something to this.

Edgar Martinez took over hitting coach responsibilities a few weeks ago when Servais was let go. Very small sample size but they’ve had some improvement on their beyond anemic offense. He obviously teaches a very old school approach and said something to the effect of “no amount of launch angle can fix a bad swing”

im reminded of watching Cal when I was growing up how often he would change his stance when he was in a bit of a slump. Now that he has a partial ownership stake in the team, it may make some sense to lean on him for input. 

Please no.

I want Cal to smile and wave.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • This board is smart enough to realize that the grass isn't always greener. The only way I see Hyde on the hot seat is if we miss the playoffs completely, which still feels very unlikely. Even then, I doubt he'd be fired during the offseason, but maybe. But then what? I don't think you give Buck Britton a shot at this roster. He's doing his thing and doing it well at AAA helping to develop guys. Could bring back Buck Showalter or Joe Girrardi, those sound like fun names. Or better yet, I bet everyone here with a torch and a pitchfork has their own little crystal ball with a short list of candidates ready to catch lightning in a bottle. 
    • The 4-run deficit was surmountable if we had more than one player who can hit the damn ball.   Kimbrel giving up six runs in the 9th may turn out to be a blessing.    
    • I wonder if last night was kind of a face saving tipping point though. Kimbrel and/or Eloy are easy famous names if Elias wants to "get serious" about optics. Not anything involving any of the long term chosen ones obviously.  
    • Really hoping the Minnesota series means nothing. I don’t care what seed they get right now..just get in. They aren’t any better at home than they are away. If you can have your spot clinched by Minnesota, I want to see them rest as many guys as possible for those games.
    • Parsing words I think "the testing of our depth" part is as close as Elias will come to critiquing Holliday and Mayo. I believe the club prides itself on its ability to prepare Bats to be ready to stay up, etc., but I do wonder if Sig Mejdal's "leading, bleeding edge" has made substitutes for actual MLB competition less effective than they have been in recent years. As awful as this run is, I've seen some comments a big off-season is ahead, but I'm not sure I agree.     There's nothing to do next April but play the guys you've planted your flag on.      Adley, Ryan, Holliday, Gunnar, Westburg, Cowser, Mullins, Kjerstad and Mayo is I think about as set an Opening Day lineup as you can find inching towards the winter.    Tommy Pham will be available for free next summer if somebody can't play. Certainly some interesting day to day calls for however long this year's ride the club can hold on for.    Prospect growth is not linear, and it still isn't impossible Holliday or Mayo will display some in the next 2 weeks.     Mayo can take dozens of at bats a day against Hurter with easy access to the Trajekt machine at home.
    • Mullins swing in a 3-2 count at a pitch that started at his shins and just was never a strike was telling. They are pressing beyond pressing, obviously. I'm just not seeing any spark from anywhere. They look tired.
    • What a funny thread. Yes we will. Will we win in the postseason? I’d say definitely no, but we’ll make it. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...