Jump to content

Time for Bergesen to go back down (update: Bergesen sent down)


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

I think it is legit to raise this issue, even though I'm in favor of bringing up Arrieta. We've seen a lot of pitchers who had good ERA's, good K's but high walk rates come up to Baltimore and flounder, like Radhames Liz previously and Hernandez last year. I just don't see a better alternative to Arrieta at present.

Liz had terrible mechanics.

DH had a lot of other issues as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It's tough to see Bergesen be sent down, because I love watching the guy pitch, and from everything he has said to watching him in the dugout and how he handles himself, he is a true professional. But last night was beyond painful. I honestly preferred watching some masterpieces of Daniel Cabrera to what I saw last night. A lot of people site the Wiggington error and the home run to Kotchman, but for me the most painful was giving up the base hit to 41 year old Ken Griffey Jr., who came in with one RBI and clearly offers nothing offensively. I love the guy, but lets face reality here.

Bergesen looked lost on the mound last night, like he had absolutely no idea what to do, and his reaction as he left the mound said it all. He was pissed, but at the same time in a complete state of disbelief. Hopefully things will begin to be worked out at Norfolk, and he'll be back soon. I believe he can be a good back of the rotation pitcher, but he's got issues to work on, and even for as bad as we are right now, Baltimore isn't the place for them.

Get back soon Brad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't you the guy who started a whole long thread yesterday (fixing the Orioles part 2 or something) with one of the major premises criticizing the development of young players and suggesting that we don't have a philosophy
Yes, which has nothing to do with this.
Walks matter.

Thank you Captain Obvious.

Look, I'm not saying Arrietta has to be perfect or that he needs to stay down until he's 35. No one said that. I am saying that 9 walks in 18 innings is not good.

Of course its not great...But you have to figure things out. Yesterday, he walked 3 batters...But he threw 61% of his pitches for strikes and 12 GOs...That is what you take away from the start.

There are very few big league pitchers that can walk a batter every 2 innings and be successful.

Yes, its only 3 starts. Lets give him a few more to see if he can perform better.

Well, he has one more...If he performs well, he is coming up.

There's 150 games left to see what he can do at the MLB level this season. I don't see why we can't give him more time to work on his control in a much less stressful environment. That's part of why you have a minor league system.
If his mechanics are sound and hitters in AAA can't do much, if anything, off of him than leaving him down accomplishes nothing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liz had terrible mechanics.

DH had a lot of other issues as well.

I don't care that Liz had terrible mechanics. It doesn't matter to me why a pitcher walks a lot of guys, just that he does. Because big league hitters, especially the ones who play in our division, are more selective than minor league hitters, so a 4.5 walk rate at Norfolk may translate to 6.0 in Baltimore, and that would be a big problem.

That said, Arrieta has some big plusses going for him and I'm ready to give him a shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I guess Rshack thinks the Orioles are totally overreacting here?

As I said (and as you fully know I said), I was not able to watch him, I was just going by what people said in the game thread. For most of the time, nobody was saying he was lousy. People were saying he started out a little rough, but then started getting a series of GB-outs, which is what we want to see him do. During the bad inning, the game thread commentary was about how he should have been out of the inning if not for the lousy D, and how he seemed to lose the strike zone after pitching around Ichiro. Bergy himself became the main focus only when he got taken out after the dinger, at which point people said he looked like he was gonna cry. So, judging by that, it did seem rash for umpteen people to start clamoring for him to be sent down when shortly before that people were saying it looked like he was finally getting in a groove. It's not like people were saying that all along, it was only after he got taken out, then it rapidly became a bandwagon. It reminded me of when people say they knew DT should have taken out the P, but they say it only after a mistake, not before when the actual decision had to be made. Perhaps I would have thought otherwise had I been able to actually see what was happening, or not, no way to know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said (and as you fully know I said), I was not able to watch him, I was just going by what people said in the game thread. For most of the time, nobody was saying he was lousy. People were saying he started out a little rough, but then started getting a series of GB-outs, which is what we want to see him do. During the bad inning, the game thread commentary was about how he should have been out of the inning if not for the lousy D, and how he seemed to lose the strike zone after pitching around Ichiro. Bergy himself became the main focus only when he got taken out after the dinger, at which point people said he looked like he was gonna cry. So, judging by that, it did seem rash for umpteen people to start clamoring for him to be sent down when shortly before that people were saying it looked like he was finally getting in a groove. It's not like people were saying that all along, it was only after he got taken out, then it became a bandwagon. Perhaps I would have thought otherwise had I been able to actually see what was happening, or not, no way to know...

So basically, you took second hand accounts and instead of asking more questions, you jump on guys like Tony and say they are overreacting...yet you didn't even see it.

Interesting...If someone on here did that you would be writing 1500 word essays about how horrible it is for any of us to do something like that...yet, when you do it, its cool? How many times have you gotten on Trea for not watching the games and not seeing what the issues are?

Do the words, double standard mean anything to you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have enough to send him down now. He was pretty bad in spring training minus that one start against the Yankees and he's been terrible and all three starts. His command is just terrible and his body language tells me he's really, really shaken by his inability to throw the ball where he wants.

If this was just a case of a guy missing some spots here and there I'd say give him a few more starts, but he looks like a wreck out there right now. With Arrieta dominating AAA, I think you make the switch now.

Hopefully he just needs more time to get back to where he was, because not only is his command off on both his sinker and slider, but the slider has backed up and is no where near the pitch it was last year.

It's tough to watch a guy melt down as quickly as he has, but his mound presence is absolutely terrible as well. Right now he doesn't look like a good Double-A pitcher.

You nailed it, Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps I would have thought otherwise had I been able to actually see what was happening, or not, no way to know...

Yet it doesn't stop you from making definitive statements now does it?

If I understand you right, you felt a need to tell everyone they were overreacting based on following what a few people were saying in the game thread? On top of the fact that most people said this is not all about one inning but his body of work this entire season, including spring training?

This really explains a lot about your posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically, you took second hand accounts and instead of asking more questions, you jump on guys like Tony and say they are overreacting...yet you didn't even see it.

I didn't jump on anybody. I said it sounded like an over-reaction. And, yes, I was basing that on what more-than-a-few people had said throughout the game in the game thread.

Interesting...If someone on here did that you would be writing 1500 word essays about how horrible it is for any of us to do something like that...yet, when you do it, its cool? How many times have you gotten on Trea for not watching the games and not seeing what the issues are?

Do the words, double standard mean anything to you?

What in the world are you rambling about? Over-reactions around here are an everyday occurrence. Please show me one time when I have criticized somebody for saying there was a message-board over-reaction. Face it, you can't do it.

Here's the funny part: Had I not gone by what people were saying in the game thread, then somebody would have said that I was "dissing the whole board" by not listening to what multiple people were saying in the game thread.

Now, having said that, it certainly appears that I was wrong. Note what I said: I was wrong, wrong, wrong. See how easy it is to say that? You should try it sometime...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, I'm fine with Bergie getting sent down to work on things. The fact remains that he has always been, and will always be, a pitcher with a slim margin for error. He has the option time, so go ahead and utilize AAA. But to the extent he goes through rough spells in the future, he is going to have to be able to work through it at the ML level, be it in the rotation or in the pen.

As an aside, this sort of issue is what many of us were talking about last year when we were pointing out that Bergesen was likely to regress some. It's just very difficult for any pitcher to be "on" all the time, and unfortunately for Bergesen the raw stuff requires that he not get too out of whack or he'll get hit hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's foolish to ignore Arrieta's walks. The only way it isn't foolish is if the O's are thinking like Tony and want to start the process of moving him to the pen.

With Arrieta's walk rate too high, Erbe, Patton, Tillman and Bergesen struggling, the next top prospect who appears to be ready is...Britton.

Here's an over reaction for everyone. Let's just say that Arrieta walks 4 in 5/6 innings this weekend in Norfolk. Why not promote the new Wunderkind?

This may be a trick question. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an aside, this sort of issue is what many of us were talking about last year when we were pointing out that Bergesen was likely to regress some. It's just very difficult for any pitcher to be "on" all the time, and unfortunately for Bergesen the raw stuff requires that he not get too out of whack or he'll get hit hard.

Really? People expected him to lose control emotionally?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? People expected him to lose control emotionally?

I'm with you on this one. He seems to have gone from rattle-proof to easily-rattled. That's an internal thing, not a throwing thing.

ps: I believe he can fix it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? People expected him to lose control emotionally?
Where did he say that? He wasn't talking at all about his body language, didn't even mention it. Stotle is just talking directly to his stuff and how Bergesen can only succeed when he's at or very near his best. He's clearly nowhere near that right now and as such is getting pounded.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Couple of things about what Mike said: 1).   Grayson will not start during the regular season.    Time has run out to build him up.   That means Burnes, Eflin. Suarez, Kremer and Povich the rest of the way if they can stay healthy.   Maybe Grayson as an opener or a reliever in the playoffs. Coulombe  as early as Friday.  I am guess either Smith or Kimbrel go. Westy and  Urias  on rehab  in the next few days.   Getting these guys back could be a  big mental boost for the team.  What level of performance they will be able to produce coming off a layoff is another things.      I would think Mayo and Holliday are optioned. Mountcastle is swinging but his wrist is still sore.   Where that goes in anyones guess.   If he comes back Jimenez will not be needed. 2).  When Mike says this has been a winning team for that last two years and he believes they can get back to that,  to me he is not just talking about the team.     He is talking about himself.    This is the first time Mike has experienced things not going the way he planned to this degree.    Quite frankly his looks a little shell shocked.    The pitching having troubles with injuries is reality to him.  Pitchers get hurt.    But his offense going from 5 runs per game in the first half  to almost zero is shocking to him.   He did not see that coming.  Adley, and O'Hearn were supposed to step up when needed.   Instead they took a step back.  None of Holliday, Mayo, or Kjerstad being able to help in the 2nd half was not the way this was planned.    Here is hoping the Westy, Urias and Kjerstad can help real soon.  
    • This board is smart enough to realize that the grass isn't always greener. The only way I see Hyde on the hot seat is if we miss the playoffs completely, which still feels very unlikely. Even then, I doubt he'd be fired during the offseason, but maybe. But then what? I don't think you give Buck Britton a shot at this roster. He's doing his thing and doing it well at AAA helping to develop guys. Could bring back Buck Showalter or Joe Girrardi, those sound like fun names. Or better yet, I bet everyone here with a torch and a pitchfork has their own little crystal ball with a short list of candidates ready to catch lightning in a bottle. 
    • The 4-run deficit was surmountable if we had more than one player who can hit the damn ball.   Kimbrel giving up six runs in the 9th may turn out to be a blessing.    
    • I wonder if last night was kind of a face saving tipping point though. Kimbrel and/or Eloy are easy famous names if Elias wants to "get serious" about optics. Not anything involving any of the long term chosen ones obviously.  
    • Really hoping the Minnesota series means nothing. I don’t care what seed they get right now..just get in. They aren’t any better at home than they are away. If you can have your spot clinched by Minnesota, I want to see them rest as many guys as possible for those games.
    • Parsing words I think "the testing of our depth" part is as close as Elias will come to critiquing Holliday and Mayo. I believe the club prides itself on its ability to prepare Bats to be ready to stay up, etc., but I do wonder if Sig Mejdal's "leading, bleeding edge" has made substitutes for actual MLB competition less effective than they have been in recent years. As awful as this run is, I've seen some comments a big off-season is ahead, but I'm not sure I agree.     There's nothing to do next April but play the guys you've planted your flag on.      Adley, Ryan, Holliday, Gunnar, Westburg, Cowser, Mullins, Kjerstad and Mayo is I think about as set an Opening Day lineup as you can find inching towards the winter.    Tommy Pham will be available for free next summer if somebody can't play. Certainly some interesting day to day calls for however long this year's ride the club can hold on for.    Prospect growth is not linear, and it still isn't impossible Holliday or Mayo will display some in the next 2 weeks.     Mayo can take dozens of at bats a day against Hurter with easy access to the Trajekt machine at home.
    • Mullins swing in a 3-2 count at a pitch that started at his shins and just was never a strike was telling. They are pressing beyond pressing, obviously. I'm just not seeing any spark from anywhere. They look tired.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...