Jump to content

Would you make this trade with Cinci?


Sports Guy

Would you make that deal with the Reds?  

100 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you make that deal with the Reds?



Recommended Posts

[/b]

He probably isnt. That is why you dont trade him for this guy. You can wait until the off season to trade him or you have next deadline or the picks. Trading him for a boarderline prospect, is not intelligent. Lets be clear on something, the Orioles DO NOT have to trade Guthrie. If they do, I want prime rib coming back, not a big bucket of stew.

An Alonso+Wood return is much better than one supplemental pick, which is not guaranteed anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I understand and can't argue with much of what you say, Greg, but you have been an advocate of trading pieces nearing free agency, and I don't know how much more you can reasonably expect in return for guys like Guthrie and Hardy. You're probably right that it's better to keep Hardy and take the draft picks, but I don't think that Guthrie is going to fetch more than an Alonso type headliner.

I personally hope we extend Hardy, but if he's dealt in a package with Guthrie, I'd be disappointed that we'd not be receiving a better prospect than Yonder Alonso. Therein lies my issue. Alonso's star has faded a bit, and I want a guy headlining a trade that represents more than what Alonso does. The deal isn't one-sided as currently constructed, but rather a bit short for what I'd want back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally hope we extend Hardy, but if he's dealt in a package with Guthrie, I'd be disappointed that we'd not be receiving a better prospect than Yonder Alonso. Therein lies my issue. Alonso's star has faded a bit, and I want a guy headlining a trade that represents more than what Alonso does. The deal isn't one-sided as currently constructed, but rather a bit short for what I'd want back.

Pretty much my opinion, though I'd be okay with that return. Hardy is a pretty comfortable type-A right now, so I think I'd prefer to offer arbitration, collect a couple of early picks, and see if I can swing Alonso and another of the mentioned guys for Guthrie alone. Hardy's type-A status also provides leverage in extension talks, as teams would be reluctant to give up a first/second round pick AND commit to a multi-year deal for a middle infielder with a lengthy injury history. Because of his type-A status, he comes cheaper to Baltimore than to any other club by default.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[/b]

He probably isnt. That is why you dont trade him for this guy. You can wait until the off season to trade him or you have next deadline or the picks. Trading him for a boarderline prospect, is not intelligent. Lets be clear on something, the Orioles DO NOT have to trade Guthrie. If they do, I want prime rib coming back, not a big bucket of stew.

You do realize the club that trades for Guthrie now gets 1.5 seasons of him vs. trading him in the offseason and only getting 1.

Guthrie is a free agent after 2012 and there's a good chance trading him now is selling him at his peak value compared to waiting.

He's not Erik Bedard so we shouldn't be expecting a Bedard type return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand and can't argue with much of what you say, Greg, but you have been an advocate of trading pieces nearing free agency, and I don't know how much more you can reasonably expect in return for guys like Guthrie and Hardy. You're probably right that it's better to keep Hardy and take the draft picks, but I don't think that Guthrie is going to fetch more than an Alonso type headliner.

What are the chances the Orioles do better than Alonso and Boxberger with the 2 picks they get for Guthrie or Hardy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just remember many people questioning whether AGon would develop power...In parts of 3 seasons at AAA, in the PCL, AGon hit 31 homers in over 900 at bats..He did in the ages of 22-24, with most of the at bats coming at 23 and 24.(he hit 1 homer in 139 at bats in AAA at age 22)

I am not saying Alonso will develop into AGon but Gonzo had an OPS of 813 in the minors, again playing a lot in the PCL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm voting yes because SG says it's the right thing to do.

While I think it is the right thing to do, I do understand some of the hesitation and do not see as a slam dunk, no doubt about it deal, which is probably why it is a realistic trade proposal IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I think it is the right thing to do, I do understand some of the hesitation and do not see as a slam dunk, no doubt about it deal, which is probably why it is a realistic trade proposal IMO.

We are also a bit spoiled by Andy MacPhail's fantastic trade record: JJ Hardy for nothing, Reynolds for Hernandez, Andino for Penn, Pie for Olson, Sherrill trade, Bedard, Tejada...

The proposed trade may be realistic, but I have faith in MacPhail to do better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are also a bit spoiled by Andy MacPhail's fantastic trade record: JJ Hardy for nothing, Reynolds for Hernandez, Andino for Penn, Pie for Olson, Sherrill trade, Bedard, Tejada...

The proposed trade may be realistic, but I have faith in MacPhail to do better.

Just FYI MacPhail's deadline trades when he's been a seller have been duds throughout his career with the exception of the Viola deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

29 - 28. This could be another short book from the 2011 Orioles season:

United We Stand on Whether or not to Trade Jeremy Guthrie and J.J. Hardy to The Reds by Orioles Hangout Posters

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are the chances the Orioles do better than Alonso and Boxberger with the 2 picks they get for Guthrie or Hardy?

Well, Alonso and Boxberger were drafted 7th and 43rd overall, and both are knocking on the doors of the big leagues, so you'd have to give them the nod.

Also, Guthrie is currently a type-B and closer to being unranked than he is to being a type-A, so we're really just talking one sandwich pick for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...