Jump to content

We need Prince Fielder as much as any team needs a single player!


GoldGlove21

Recommended Posts

If I were doing everything strickly off of WAR then I would say $100M, but as we see in most sports there is no metric when it comes to game changers. Leaders are born, I do not think they are developed. You either have it or you do not. Who is the Orioles true leader? I hear Wieters and Jones, but those guys do not match up to Fielder in any way. 4 years and $64M for Dunn was a risk, I know it is two years shorter, but what is two years when you are not getting production? I am not ignoring what Fielder has done in the past, not at all. His career OPS is .927 and that will likely contuinue to go up this season. His career OBP is .388, Derek Jeter who leads off for the Yankees is .383 over the course of his career.

Fielder's WAR numbers are seriously derailed at times due to his fielding numbers, but if you were to make him a DH at any point you could compensate for some of that lost WAR. I am not a huge fan of WAR, because it just looks at stats and doesn't take into account how a single player could make other better or the leadership of a given player. Did Jeter get and deserve $23M-$25M a year from the Yankees? No, but if you just looked at the stats then you would never see the real value he adds to that team, he leads. Rodriguez isn't the leader, but Fielder has that kind of offensive potential. If I were asked to list the top first baseman in the game I would be hard pressed not to put Fielder in the top-5.

I think you are foolish to ignore stats, but they can't be the entire story either. I see a fire in Adam Jones that I do not see in Nick Markakis or Matt Wieters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Is anyone going to argue that what it takes to get a top of the rotation starter is less risky than the contract we would give Fielder? We need both an Ace and Middle of the Order bat, but an Ace might not hit the open market this year. That means that Fielder should be even more of a priority. I think $25M is overpaying for Fielder over, yes, but I would do it on a 6-year deal. I am not going 7/$175M on him, but I might go 7/$165M and defer some of those funds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles can't have it both ways. The philosophy should have always been to develop the best talent possible and supplement it with free agents as needed. We don't want to spend a lot of pitching because it is fragile and risky. We don't want to spend on top hitters because they are too risky. Sounds to me like a team that doesn't want to spend money for the best of anything at all. That is not going to work in the AL East. Hell, we didn't even offer Mussina an extension because we didn't feel he was worth and we saw how much more the Yankees gave him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prince Fielder would be a bad investment. He is not Mark Teixeira or Adrian Gonzalez. I disagree.

I don't think the Tex deal is working out all that great for the Yankees. He isn't really a top echelon first baseman but he sure is getting paid like one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the Tex deal is working out all that great for the Yankees. He isn't really a top echelon first baseman but he sure is getting paid like one.

I agree he is overpaid. I just think he is more durable and a better return on the dollar. Just an opinion of course...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adrian Gonzalez maybe right behind Pujols in terms of the best first baseman in the game. It took the Red Sox 7/$154M to extend him after giving up Anthony Rizzo, Casey Kelly and Raymond Fuentes. Kelly was the 31st ranked prospect and Rizzo was 75th by Baseball America. So the Red Sox essentially gave up their Zach Britton and a Yonder Alonso type in addition to Fuentes for a guy that they needed to turn around and extend for $22M per season. How are the Orioles going to get top players without some form of risk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree he is overpaid. I just think he is more durable and a better return on the dollar. Just an opinion of course...

I think Tex's defense helps him a lot. If both guys were a DH Fielder would be right up there. The bottom line is that coveted players at any position are not cheap. You can sign a great player or keep running out first base "prospects" that would not be real prospects in any good system and guys like Lee who will be place holders until something better shows up. Good teams find ways to get better, mediocre teams get lucky every now and then, and teams like the Orioles lose because they do not understand how to allocate their resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Tex's defense helps him a lot. If both guys were a DH Fielder would be right up there. The bottom line is that coveted players at any position are not cheap. You can sign a great player or keep running out first base "prospects" that would not be real prospects in any good system and guys like Lee who will be place holders until something better shows up. Good teams find ways to get better, mediocre teams get lucky every now and then, and teams like the Orioles lose because they do not understand how to allocate their resources.

I just think trading Guthrie for someone like Alonso, or maybe a young KC 1B would be a better option than sinking over $140 million into Fielder. (Sure KC may not even be interested.) I don't think he changes the lineup quite as dramatically as earlier posts would lead one to believe. I think we are a young team on the rise and we need to stay patient and make smart moves. Dropping Fielder FA money would very likely hamstring the club for the foreseeable future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might be better off sneaking in and offering Sabathia a monster deal right after he opts out of his deal with the Yankees. Thought is he wants to stay in NY but wants more money/years and will 100% opt out to get that.

Sabathia will be 31 at the start of next season and will turn 32 in July of next year. You need to remember that he would be opting out of a deal that paid him $21.5M per season to get more money. He might not even opt out and if he does it could be to renegotiate with the Yankees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends what kind of production you want I suppose. If you want a legit All Star and middle of the order bat then you go with Fielder. Alonso has shown very little power in the minors and is league average at best on first. Maybe he can play left, but then we would still need a first baseman. By trading Guthrie we would be opening another hole in an already poor rotation as well. I think we need to trade Guthrie, but then why not trade him for Alonso and let him play left and sign Fielder to play first? We are going to have to pay for pitching one way or another.

We need two quality starters right now to go with Guthrie IMO, if you trade Guthrie then you need 2-3 starters next season. If you get Alonso and a guy like Boxberger then you fill a position need at 1B/LF for the rest of the season and you get a solid pitching prospect in Boxberger. If you get Fielder then the focus can fully shift to starting pitching in free agency and you give a pitcher an awesome lineup to appreciate. This team needs its young pitching to develop and you mitigate that risk by allowing 3-5 guys to pitch for 2 slots verses 4 guys pretty much being guaranteed a roster spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as the finances go, we see the Orioles run out somewhat washed up guys like Lee, Guerrero, and Segui all the time. They also love the high priced relief pitching market. I can go find a laundry list of guys making $4M-$7M per year that never should have been on an Orioles roster. I know the Rays were able to develop a dynamite young pitching core and they sustain their winning through that core, but they are also one of the exceptions to the rule. They were the worse team in baseball for about a decade and drafted highly. They also spend a ton in the draft and worked the system. If the Orioles were better at any of this I would say they should go this route, but they continue to operate in the somewhere in between.

Either go all in at around $100M-$115M or operate a much lower prodict and truely build through the system. In order to operate in this mode however we will need to trade guys like Jones, Wieters and Hardy when their value is at the highest peak. We will have to take on what's left of bad contracts to gain prospects or pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sabathia will be 31 at the start of next season and will turn 32 in July of next year. You need to remember that he would be opting out of a deal that paid him $21.5M per season to get more money. He might not even opt out and if he does it could be to renegotiate with the Yankees.

And he's another really fat guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...