Jump to content

Rasmus


paulcoates

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 261
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Nah...For the apologists, none of this matters. You will learn that.

The nature of the deal doesn't make you wonder why someone else didn't top it? Certainly doesn't seem like much of a haul to me for a guy of Rasmus' caliber.

So what's missing? Did everyone else crap themselves? It's not like Rasmus wasn't the #1 overall BA prospect like 3 years ago. He's obviously talented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've never learned how not to be an ass. So to assume that people will learn things is poor thinking on your part.
Oh i have...Just not to those who deserve zero respect for their idiotic analysis.

You have never learned how you are consistently proven wrong, year after year. Its pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure that's an issue. But you have to take these things with both a general view and a specific view. The general view is what you are saying. The specific view is what I'm saying.

Then let's just say that, for once, I'd rather be debating the virtues or lack thereof of the Orioles' having just acquired a young, extremely talented player via trade or free agency, as opposed to lamenting the almost ceaseless aggravation that comes with the Orioles once again sitting on the sidelines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The nature of the deal doesn't make you wonder why someone else didn't top it? Certainly doesn't seem like much of a haul to me for a guy of Rasmus' caliber.

So what's missing? Did everyone else crap themselves? It's not like Rasmus wasn't the #1 overall BA prospect like 3 years ago. He's obviously talented.

But who cares? Maybe the guy is a total douche bag. But you know what, that total douche bag was worth over 4 WAR as a 23 y/o last year.

Yunel Escobar was traded for peanuts last year and he was an elite talent at an elite position.

Deals like this happen all the time.

Why do you think we stole Hardy? Poor performance, expensive and injury prone. No team could top the garbage we dealt?

Does that mean we shouldn't have extended him? Or does it mean that maybe the other teams were wrong to not take a risk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The nature of the deal doesn't make you wonder why someone else didn't top it? Certainly doesn't seem like much of a haul to me for a guy of Rasmus' caliber.

He already admitted that things that may have a serious impact on a player's ability to turn raw talent into production don't bother him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But who cares? Maybe the guy is a total douche bag. But you know what, that total douche bag was worth over 4 WAR as a 23 y/o last year.

Yunel Escobar was traded for peanuts last year and he was an elite talent at an elite position.

Deals like this happen all the time.

Why do you think we stole Hardy? Poor performance, expensive and injury prone. No team could top the garbage we dealt?

Does that mean we shouldn't have extended him? Or does it mean that maybe the other teams were wrong to not take a risk?

Wait, so Hardy counts in this thread but not in the other?

And if you are this worried, we could always go out and get Elijah Dukes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then let's just say that, for once, I'd rather be debating the virtues or lack thereof of the Orioles' having just acquired a young, extremely talented player via trade or free agency, as opposed to lamenting the almost ceaseless aggravation that comes with the Orioles once again sitting on the sidelines.

Um, ok...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But who cares? Maybe the guy is a total douche bag. But you know what, that total douche bag was worth over 4 WAR as a 23 y/o last year.

Yunel Escobar was traded for peanuts last year and he was an elite talent at an elite position.

Deals like this happen all the time.

Why do you think we stole Hardy? Poor performance, expensive and injury prone. No team could top the garbage we dealt?

Does that mean we shouldn't have extended him? Or does it mean that maybe the other teams were wrong to not take a risk?

We've been losing with a bunch of "nice guys" for a long, long time. I'd like to have nine [AHEM!] "douche bags" like Rasmus on my team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But who cares? Maybe the guy is a total douche bag. But you know what, that total douche bag was worth over 4 WAR as a 23 y/o last year.

Yunel Escobar was traded for peanuts last year and he was an elite talent at an elite position.

Deals like this happen all the time.

Why do you think we stole Hardy? Poor performance, expensive and injury prone. No team could top the garbage we dealt?

Does that mean we shouldn't have extended him? Or does it mean that maybe the other teams were wrong to not take a risk?

And he was just traded from a 1st place team with a half a game lead in their division for peanuts!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, ok...

Try to look at it a different way: no one is arguing with you that "something might be up" which drove Rasmus' price down. Evidently, at least two, much better (one far superior) organizations felt like he was worth the risk. The O's suck...and they do nothing, even though having Rasmus to play CF or LF would basically, best-case, solve the Orioles' OF problems for years.

What about the way this team has handled itself for the last 14 years makes you think that taking the safe road in a situation like this is the right way to go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And he was just traded from a 1st place team with a half a game lead in their division for peanuts!!!!!!!!!
A team that had a big need for a starter...But again, SO WHAT!?

Just because he had an issue with LaRussa, does that mean he would have here? Does that mean he will be a jerk here?

Maybe he just made some dumb mistakes, as we all do when we are young and just needed to get away from LaRussa?

Again, look at Escobar...He was supposed to be a jerk...The Braves didn't want him..the same organization that dealt Andrus because they had Escobar, that's how much they did like him and then turned on him. That's how much he was hated by that team....and now look at him. The Jays love him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
    • Dam the mosquito is in my Jelly. Please go away
    • Elias is refusing to spend money that Rubenstein has made available.  Do you have any sources?
    • Outside Hamilton, I can't really think of any areas or invidivuals outside the line that have really stepped up.  Humphrey and Stephens have played okay but it certainly hasn't offset the complete zeroes that Eddie Jackson and Marcus Williams have been.  I don't think you want to pull Hamilton off SS even though he can handle deep zone assignments fine, because he's essentially a linebacker that can cover wide receivers and there's too much value in that in the box.  And I think that Roquan/Simpson look lost in pass coverage because the safeties behind them are playing like butt.  Besides Roquan wasn't ever really a great coverage safety, he was kind of okay at it but he was never like a Lavonte David or Fred Warner there.   I'm starting to wonder if we need to either trade for a FS and/or start giving Ardarius Washington more snaps.  He certainly doesn't look worse than Jackson/Williams at this point in his limited playing time.  In general i think safety is an undervalued position so we're likely to get good value in trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...