Jump to content

vs Rays 5/12/12


Satyr3206

Recommended Posts

Anyone notice that Matt seems to always have the green light in 2-0 and 3-0 counts, and as a result, is generally swinging in those counts? I know we've regaled him with all manner of compliments this year and firmly installed him as "#1 C in baseball", "legitimate star", etc, etc, but we already knew he was a damn good defensive catcher, the question is could he make the next step as a hitter? His .887 OPS in a relatively small sample size doesn't necessarily guarantee that he's made that jump...perhaps we're giving him a bit too much respect too early.

Why would we give him respect? He's obviously a bust. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 584
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The thing I like to see about this game tonight is that we are really making Moore work. Jim Palmer thinks that some of it is self-inflicted (he's throwing off the plate when he doesn't need to and it isn't even a command issue, just pitch choice), but we're also showing good plate discipline.

I am hoping we'll get 4 innings out of their bullpen, or if we're lucky, more. :)

He really needs to use his fastball more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I am remembering correctly?

I don't generally doubt my memory but that isn't the sort of thing I want to get wrong.

can you point me to that tweet, because I can't remember my password. Thanks. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If our backups can keep going 4-5-6-7 pitches per at-bat, I don't care if they all strike out. This is very valuable.

4 isn't very valuable, but I'll take 6 and up for sure. Foul off some pitches and hey, you might get lucky and also stroke a hit, like Tolleson did. But yeah, when you've got a lead like this, all you really need is to hold the line, and get through their starter... the back of the order is definitely making Moore work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If our backups can keep going 4-5-6-7 pitches per at-bat, I don't care if they all strike out. This is very valuable.

Definitely. Hall is seeing a lot of pitches today especially. His career average pitches/PA is 4.04 which is above average but not great.

Interesting stat to note: Mark Reynolds is first in the AL with 4.66 right no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Agreed, with the caveat that I'm not convinced that (for example) the 1927 Negro Leagues were a completely different quality of play compared to the 1927 AL/NL. My guess is that if the MLB quality was 1.00 and the International League was .90, then the Negro Leagues of that year were .97 or something.
    • They have to DFA Vieria today right? You can't carry this guy in a 30 game stretch that has started off with two short starts.
    • I think pitcher's platoon splits can be larger, and not just due to random variation. Because pitchers can employ strategies that emphasize the platoon split, like throwing sidearm sweepers/sliders that are vastly more effective against same-sided hitters. Hitters really don't have the option of using some kind of strategy that is wildly more effective against one type of pitcher, or one hand of pitcher.
    • Considering our shallow starting pitching pool, should we put on a full court press to extend Corbin Burnes?
    • With the caveats of my last post. Baseball is kind of unique in that Jorge Mateo and Adam Frazier can get as many chances to impact a game as Mike Trout. It's a little like a version of basketball where everyone on the court had to take at least 15% of the team's shots and nobody could take more than 25%. Or a version of football where you have five starting QBs, and they each only start once every five games. And all of them get 162 games to even out the luck. But, yes, variations in performance and randomness impact every sport.
    • I think we're saying the same thing, or at least we rhyme. If they're going to include one league that has completely different quality of play, why not all leagues? Why stop at the Negro Leagues?
    • Baseball is different from most other team sports in a number of key aspects: The number of trials. 162 games is a lot of games to have random variation smooth out. If you pick random 16-game stretches you'll have NFL-like outliers, such as teams going 15-1 or 1-15. Nobody goes 150-12. Pitchers are very limited in how much they can pitch. A 200-inning starter can only have so much impact. Hitters cannot get more than ~1/8th of a team's PAs. This and the prior point means that there's no way around having your 3rd- and 5th and even 14th-best players getting almost as much playing time as #1. So you end up with the most dominant teams usually not even winning 2/3rds of their games, wherein other sports you can have teams win 80% or more. Which makes baseball look more random. Contributing to this is the expanded playoffs, where a .600 vs .575 matchup is more-or-less a coin flip. I doubt most other sports have a situation where the obviously best team in the league has a 25%-ish shot of the Championship (in other words, a 75% chance of going home disappointed) on day one of the playoffs. In most soccer leagues the regular season champ is The Champ, so there's a 0% chance of that. The best team always takes a big trophy home.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...