Jump to content

Tillman


whynot38

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 734
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I am constantly amazed at the startling analysis I see here from the experts on Tillman re: his FB. Or his curve for that matter.....

So Tillman doesn't have a flat fastball? And yep, I am still holding onto what I last saw from Tillman because, quite frankly, I don't care what he's done in AAA this year. He's shown that he can get minor league hitters out before, this isn't new and this isn't special.

I don't have to have a background in scouting or biomechanical analysis to know that ML hitters slugged .600 against Tillman when he threw a fastball last year. I also don't need to have a background in scouting or biomechanical analysis to know that he threw 49% of his curveballs for strikes last year when the league average was 63%. http://www.baseballanalytics.org/baseball-analytics-blog/tag/chris-tillman

I sure hope that he can come back up here and astonish me and everyone else here who's tired of wondering when he'll come around. However, I remain skeptical and I think I have a pretty good reason for doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Tillman, just like for all of them, it's all about fastball command and keeping the ball down.

He can't be much worse than we've gotten, that's for sure.

And this is the most frustrating thing, without a doubt. People just constantly post here "Oh, he just need to command his fastball...oh, with better fastball command, he'll be fine....oh, he just needs to be able to locate his fastball with more consistency."

Like it's no big deal. But it's a huge deal. It's a monumental deal. Velocity and movement don't matter if they can't command it. You can be Brad Pennington or Brian Matusz, doesn't matter.

It's incredibly alarming and disappointing that our homegrown talent can not do the most basic thing that a pitcher should be able to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How awesome would it be for Tillman to just flat out dominate for the rest of the season? It would be a dream come true if this kid finally fires on all cylinders and becomes a very good ML pitcher. Ahhh, I can dream, can't I?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good luck to Tillman. I really hope he does well and as DD has suggested he is a different pitcher and has turned the corner. Stabilizing the 4 spot in the rotation would be huge. With a shaky M's pitcher starting tomorrow we have a chance to win the series and get back on track.

Also, in the back of my kind I see Tillman as a trade chip. Apparently a lot have been calling about Tillman. He may be a center piece of a trade for a Garza or something like that if he proves he can be a winning ML pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Tillman doesn't have a flat fastball? And yep, I am still holding onto what I last saw from Tillman because, quite frankly, I don't care what he's done in AAA this year. He's shown that he can get minor league hitters out before, this isn't new and this isn't special.

I don't have to have a background in scouting or biomechanical analysis to know that ML hitters slugged .600 against Tillman when he threw a fastball last year. I also don't need to have a background in scouting or biomechanical analysis to know that he threw 49% of his curveballs for strikes last year when the league average was 63%. http://www.baseballanalytics.org/baseball-analytics-blog/tag/chris-tillman

I sure hope that he can come back up here and astonish me and everyone else here who's tired of wondering when he'll come around. However, I remain skeptical and I think I have a pretty good reason for doing so.

Your fastball tends to look straight when it's 89.5 MPH and you're not even throwing 2-seemers, especially coming from a righty (avg. velocity for his FB last year). It just isn't a recipe for success.

His FB averaged 92.0 in his rookie year. From the reports it sounds like he's at least back to those levels. That, plus increased maturity and evolution as a pitcher (he was 21 in his rookie year) gives him a fighting chance to be a decent starter at the ML level. He certainly gets a pretty ideal start against a really bad hitting team in an extreme pitcher's park. I expect him to do well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a believer, but I'll keep an open mind. He looked better in ST and it sounds like he has made more improvements. Be interesting to see where he's at. Like Bd0493 said, SEA should be a good opportunity for him to have some success out of the box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know he's been a Peterson project, and he struggled at first with the mechanical adjustments, but posted a really nice June (4-1, 2.51 ERA, 34 K's and 5 BB's in 28.2 IP). His velo has been good. I really hope his FB is more lively than it was (stuff/movement wise) last year. I'm cautiously optimistic.

How's that for some ridiculously un-startling analysis CA-ORIOLE? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know he's been a Peterson project, and he struggled at first with the mechanical adjustments, but posted a really nice June (4-1, 2.51 ERA, 34 K's and 5 BB's in 28.2 IP). His velo has been good. I really hope his FB is more lively than it was (stuff/movement wise) last year. I'm cautiously optimistic.

How's that for some ridiculously un-startling analysis CA-ORIOLE? ;)

Sounds good to me. If he can get ML hitters out consistently, the analysis doesn't really matter. Lets see what you got Tillman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has struggled to get deep in games at AAA and we have all seen him put up good numbers at AAA before so it's not like anyone is expecting him to be an ace. I like that his walks are down and he is getting more ground balls. He can't be worse than Matusz or Hunter have been. Hopefully he makes the most of this opportunity because he might not get another one with the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm excited to get a look at Tillman today, but I won't draw any big conclusions no matter how he looks. Consistency has always been the problem for Tillman. I'd rather see three solid starts in a row than one brilliant one. Hopefully his work with Peterson will allow Tillman to be more consistent than he has been in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I was curious how GRod would pitch given that huge crowd and electric atmosphere. I feel like he has a tendency to get too amped up and overthrow. Granted I didn’t start watching until inning 3, but he looked absolutely in control and executed his pitches.  Certainly a big step forward as far as I’m concerned.
    • Unless Santander goes on an absolute tear the rest of the season, I don't think he turns down a qualifying offer. And even then, it'd be real easy to look at FA deals for 30-ish year old outfielders who are good regulars but not stars and realize there's a good chance he won't beat a QO in guaranteed money, especially with a QO attached. As much as I'd like the pick, I don't want to gamble 20-30M and another year of stunted opportunity for our young outfielders on Santander turning down a QO.
    • Yeah, it's getting to the point where I'm not going to cry if McDermott finishes the year in AAA. I'm not against bringing him up necessarily, but he's clearly got more work to do on control/command if he wants to be a good major league starter long-term.
    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...