Jump to content

Report: Morosi says a source links us with Hamilton and Ross


Conway12

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 428
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'll believe the Yankees are cutting payroll when I see it. That said, they probably already know they're going to be regretting some contracts and possibly at this time could be gun shy on such.

They do want Rivera to take a pay cut.

I think it is in their best interest to get under the threshold for one year, as that would reset the penalties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. The Yankees are said to be against the lux tax threshold. They have publicly said they dont want to pay the tax. Im certain a extra 25 mil will push them way over.

H

The year for the Yankees to get under the luxury tax threshold in 2014 when it raises to 189M. As long as they structure long term contracts like Hamilton's, Cano's and others to have low salaries in 2014 the luxury tax resets to zero. Here is an article that explains it.

2) For the first time, under this labor deal, a team that drives its payroll below the threshold, even for one year, can hit the reset button. So if it then goes back over that threshold in a future season, it's treated as a first-time offender and taxed at only 17.5 percent. (

http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/page/rumblings120113/why-yankees-red-sox-spen

So it not a matter of the Yankees not spending. Its a matter of the Yankees structuring their long term contracts to be low in 2014.

Remember that the new TV contract will paid them an additional 25M in 2014. They can spend in 2013 and repay it when the salaries are lower in 2014.

So I don't see the luxury tax keeping the Yankees from signing Hamilton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a token offer and that the Rangers don't want him back at all.

Yet some other team looking at that is going to pay him 7/$150 million?? Not happening.

The worst thing that could have possibly happened for Hamilton was Texas' current stance on wanting him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The year for the Yankees to get under the luxury tax threshold in 2014 when it raises to 189M. As long as they structure long term contracts like Hamilton's, Cano's and others to have low salaries in 2014 the luxury tax resets to zero. Here is an article that explains it.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/page/rumblings120113/why-yankees-red-sox-spen

So it not a matter of the Yankees not spending. Its a matter of the Yankees structuring their long term contracts to be low in 2014.

Remember that the new TV contract will paid them an additional 25M in 2014. They can spend in 2013 and repay it when the salaries are lower in 2014.

So I don't see the luxury tax keeping the Yankees from signing Hamilton.

Every single report I have seen said the Yankees want nothing to do with Hamilton, and are not in the mix. If you can find one that says otherwise please post it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The worst thing that could have possibly happened for Hamilton was Texas' current stance on wanting him back.

There has been some good research showing that free agents who switch teams are not as productive as those who re-up with their current team. If the team that knows you best has tepid interest in your continued employment that's often with good reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They do want Rivera to take a pay cut.

I think it is in their best interest to get under the threshold for one year, as that would reset the penalties.

The paycut has more to do with Rivera being what 41 and coming off missing most of the 2012. The Yankees in the end will spend if needed. Supposedly they didnt want to increase payroll at the trade deadline, yet they went out and got Ichiro in a Seattle salary dump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The paycut has more to do with Rivera being what 41 and coming off missing most of the 2012. The Yankees in the end will spend if needed. Supposedly they didnt want to increase payroll at the trade deadline, yet they went out and got Ichiro in a Seattle salary dump.
Suzuki, 38, is in the final year of a five-year, $90 million contract, but the Yankees will pay only $2.5 million of what remains, and the two players they gave up are not their top prospects.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/24/sports/baseball/ichiro-suzuki-acquired-by-yankees-in-trade-with-mariners.html

It wasn't a salary dump for the Mariners as much as it was giving Ichrio the trade to a contender it wanted. Also the Yankees taking on 2.5 Mill for the 2012 season doesn't impact them trying to get under the cap in future seasons, they already were over the cap for 2012 when the deal was made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every single report I have seen said the Yankees want nothing to do with Hamilton, and are not in the mix. If you can find one that says otherwise please post it.

IIRC, Yankees weren't reportedly in on Teixera, either, until they signed him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has been some good research showing that free agents who switch teams are not as productive as those who re-up with their current team. If the team that knows you best has tepid interest in your continued employment that's often with good reason.

:agree:

And this is exactly why I don't touch Hamilton unless he agrees to a 4 year or less deal. Let the Yankees spend 150 on another aging vet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Not for someone who has money riding on him winning the award.
    • Well, now that we’ve established the hitting sucks, is it a good time to complain that this pitching is obviously over performing and will crash and burn any day now?
    • The bullpen has much more depth this year than last year but it just feels like you don’t know who will be the guy each night.  Last year it was get to the 8th and you knew it was Cano and Bautista and lights out.  This year it doesn’t seem to be set roles especially with Kimberly strugggles and out as clasper for now possibly.  I also think Hyde gets a lot of grief about how he handles the bullpen but I think he has been great at looking at the game situation and with who he wants facing what guys.  Cano might come in the 6th one night then close the next, same with Webb or even Coulumbe.  I know a lot of it is analytics but as a group they make a plan and seem to stick with it instead of some managers that have 7 inning guy an 8th inning guy and closer and don’t deviate much.  
    • On the replay you can see that Julio was lightly jogging after the ball-- either assuming the RF would get it, or assuming Hays wouldn't run. Good on Hays for taking advantage and turning it into a double. 
    • I think in general people are more negative in life not just in sports and they need to blame someone or something.  In previous years we had a scapegoat in Peter and John.  Elias didn’t go out and make a trade it was because he didn’t have the money to go get anyone or the owner didn’t want to spend.  Now for the most part people seem to think new ownership will give the ok to spend more so now if we don’t do it it is on Elias, Sig, and Hyde for not getting best out of the players.  We dint make a big trade last year and most people just went with well John is cheap we don’t do what they want now it will fall on Elias more then last year in peoples eyes imo.  
    • Mike Baumann.  An enigma wrapped in a conundrum.  Ride the wave!
    • The Yankees have been extremely healthy on offense as well.  If that somehow happens all year they will be right there with us but if I was a betting man I don’t think Judge, Stanton, Rizzo can stay healthy all year and they have very little depth behind those guys.  Besides Adley we have guys at every other position that can fill in if someone goes down.  There might be a drop some but I don’t think it would be catastrophic like losing Judge or Soto.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...