Jump to content

Matt Hobgood - is there hope? (No, there is not. Indy League bound.)


McLovin

Recommended Posts

He looked very good today. I chatted with him after the game and he said he is feeling stronger every week and hopes to be back at full strength by summer. I feel it will be more like nearer the end of the season, but in any event all is going well right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 565
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Nice to see these results. Not sure what that 1 inning aberration was, but it has now been two 3 and 4 inning stints.

Nice to hear that he is feeling stronger and that he is not near full strength - that there should be more in the tank.

Very encouraging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone is apprehensive about getting too excited for Matt after undergoing shoulder surgery and never really showing any of the promise he displayed pre-draft. But if he's doing this well at less than 100% you have to be pretty excited moving forward. Thanks for the update Doc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Even after going 3 & 4 1/3 in his last 2 outings, O's r not considering moving Matt Hobgood to rotation now. Happy with his progress in pen.</p>— Steve Melewski (@masnSteve) <a href="

">May 7, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my nephew in an interview with Brett Hollander. Please ignore the Tommy John comment in the notes. He didn't have Tommy John surgery.

http://www.wbal.com/article/99792/50/template-story/Matt-Hobgood-Is-Working-His-Way-Back

Hi there...sorry that I don't know your name. I was wondering if Matt still views himself as a starting pitcher?

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice interview. Would be very very encouraging if he can make it to Frederick at some point this year even if its only a few games near the end.

Yeah, but I think they're taking it slow with him and I think that's smart. His performance is very encouraging, but I don't want to put too much stress on his arm or body this year. If he can ease through Delmarva for a full season, that wouldn't be a bad thing. Give him that time and another offseason and then start being more aggressive. I won't be mad if he's in Frederick, but if he is I hope it's as a reliever in relatively short stints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my nephew in an interview with Brett Hollander. Please ignore the Tommy John comment in the notes. He didn't have Tommy John surgery.

http://www.wbal.com/article/99792/50/template-story/Matt-Hobgood-Is-Working-His-Way-Back

Thanks very much for posting this. It's great to see Matt having some success after the physical struggles he's had.

It sounds like his velocity is not quite all the way back. He said he was throwing 88-92, touching 93. But that's something to pay attention to later. For now, I'm just hoping for him to have a healthy year, get in maybe 80 IP, and make it to Frederick at some point.

It's interesting to see that he's not striking out that many guys, and his GB rate is lower than when he first arrived, but he's allowing very few hits and hasn't given up a homer. His BABIP must be extremely low, and probably will come up as the season progresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • OP is asking about next year as well as this one. I think the point is we can get a guy who will help us now and next year. We did expect to lose Bradish but not him and Means and Wells all at the same time. Right now we would be going into next year with Grayson as our only dependable guy. Won't be much margin for error without another Burnes type. 
    • Something to keep in mind in the offseason is that the starting pitcher FA market doesn’t look that great in terms of pitchers we would sign or even want to sign. On top of that, you have several guys who only become FA if they opt out and if they opt out, it’s likely because they didn’t have a great season. Combine that with the idea that our only 2 internal rotation candidates are Povich and McDermott, both of whom have exhibited a lot of issues with command and control and it certainly is a shaky long term outlook for the rotation. Position player wise, we will (in theory) lose Santander and McCann. Hays and Mullins are likely gone. Not going to have both Mateo and Urias but certainly could bring back one. As of now, OHearn definitely has his option picked up. If it were up to me, Mounty would be traded. 2 years left of control, likely to be coming off a very solid season and we have players behind him. He could help fetch us some pitching. My expectation is at least 2 of Mounty, OHearn and Santander will be back. How so many of these guys and our prospects end the year will determine how we attack the offseason. But for the deadline, I think obtaining a starter that can be here long term is something the team should look at.     You have several options in Miami and potentially a guy like Detmers.    A Detmers/Estevez package is something I would be looking into.  Same thing with Nardi and one of the Marlins starters, like a Braxton Garrett for example. For me, the key here is that you need to upgrade the pen. I think if you make the pen really good and you have Burnes and GRod, that may be enough.    In not trading our top 3 prospects. I think all play big roles in 2025, although Basallo may not play a role until the season is well underway, But I would trade Kjerstad and anyone else while hoping to keep certain guys although they wouldn’t be deal breakers.  
    • And Fangraphs has the Yankees 68% to 31% to win the division.
    • Would a package including Kjerstad and Norby (possibly Stowers too) be able to get us Sonny Gray and Helsley? STL has to at some point come to a conclusion that they don't have enough to legit compete for a World Series this year or the next few projectable years. This would give them an infusion of young talent and get Gray off of their books. That's 3 young controllable starting position players for their #1 and closer. I'm not sure what the value proposition is there. But this is the kind of trade that I would be looking to make and I think it helps both ball clubs.
    • Pitching injuries are happening to a crazy degree all over the sport. We still have our #1 starter who is the best starter that we have had in decades and a very talented #2/3. All is not lost.
    • Just another argument for roboumps
    • There will be FAs (none admittedly as good as Burnes) that we can sign. We have a ridiculously low payroll and aren't paying anyone.  We are not going to maintain excellence long term by only using the draft and trades to meaningfully add talent. We are going to have to use the free agent market (wisely) too.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...