Jump to content

Matt Hobgood - is there hope? (No, there is not. Indy League bound.)


McLovin

Recommended Posts

This is actually kind of shocking. After his operation which I had never even heard of before (shoulder tightening) its great to see him doing so well. Didnt another Oriole prospect have the same surgery that Hobgood got? Wonder how that kid is doing?

Dan Klein. It did not work the first or the second time. He has had several setbacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 565
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Dan Klein. It did not work the first or the second time. He has had several setbacks.

Pretty sure Klein's surgery involved a torn labrum that had already been surgically repaired, along with loosening the capsule whereas Matt only had his capsule tightened up. A lot more at stake when the dreaded labrum is involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt hit 94 in his scoreless appearance at Hagerstown. So far he has 7 innings with 0 earned runs.

When I talked to him he said that he is getting stretched out to be a starter within the next month or so. Hopes to finish at Frederick this year, Bowie would be icing on the cake.

Matt is is a really good place mentally, having known him for a while. The shoulder is great, he looks like he is in GREAT shape, and like he told me he is only 85% velo because the season just started. We will see him hit 96 this year.

He's a pitcher that gets stronger as the game goes on is what I was told by the Shorebirds manager.

I'll tell you who is impressive is Branden Kline...96 at Delmarva. Hit 95 once too. Sat 91-94

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt hit 94 in his scoreless appearance at Hagerstown. So far he has 7 innings with 0 earned runs.

When I talked to him he said that he is getting stretched out to be a starter within the next month or so. Hopes to finish at Frederick this year, Bowie would be icing on the cake.

Matt is is a really good place mentally, having known him for a while. The shoulder is great, he looks like he is in GREAT shape, and like he told me he is only 85% velo because the season just started. We will see him hit 96 this year.

He's a pitcher that gets stronger as the game goes on is what I was told by the Shorebirds manager.

I'll tell you who is impressive is Branden Kline...96 at Delmarva. Hit 95 once too. Sat 91-94

Thanks for the updates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt said something at the end of the interview, which I found interesting. He basically said he liked pitching in relief because you have to throw strikes immediately. You don't have time to waste. You need to get hitters out quick... or something to that effect. You need to be efficient with your pitches.

Man, that is a quality many of our pitchers need. Too many of our guys are inefficient with their pitches. I'm thinking of Tillman and Arrieta especially. I wonder if being a reliever is truly something good for becoming more efficient.

There seems to be a couple reasons to give young pitchers time as relievers in the minors.

1. They learn to pitch efficiently

2. Their innings are limited

I wonder if this could become a trend if Hobgood has success. Really rooting for the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another scoreless inning last night, he gave himself a bit of a test though after walking the lead-off man, he then threw a wild pitch moving lead-off man to 2nd, he then walked the next batter leaving men on 1st and 2nd with no outs. A force out and double play ended the inning.

The Shorebirds pitchers gave up 8 walks last night so perhaps the strike zone was a little squeezed.

IP1 H0 R0 ER0 BB2 SO0 ERA 0.00

IP8 H3 R0 ER0 BB4 SO5 ERA 0.00

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if being a reliever is truly something good for becoming more efficient.

There seems to be a couple reasons to give young pitchers time as relievers in the minors.

1. They learn to pitch efficiently

2. Their innings are limited

I'll defer to those who are more involved in these actual discussions, but if you are developing a pitcher to help the major league club either in the future or as trade bait, starting is really the only option. Failed starters in the minors become relievers. But not usually at the minor league level if they are going to have a major league career. Conversion is relatively quick if they are stretched out as a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's certainly the preferred option. It's definitely not the only option. There are certainly many examples of pitchers who were developed as relievers and were successful ML pitchers.

There I go, broad brush generalizing again ;)

I did say "Not usually" in the next sentence. So there is that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, knowing Matt very well, and being a minor league intern, I am proud to say that he is on the right track.

He is finally healthy and is in a great state of mind. Steve Sharpe an Oakland Athletics scout clocked him 3 times against the Hagerstown Suns at 95.

Right now Matt told me that they are planning to pitch him out of the bullpen, and he is working his way up to the rotation. He figures to be a part of it in May at some point, and plans on finishing at Frederick this year.

Matt and I talked a lot about the "bust" label. He said "People can say what they want to, but the Angles were going to take me with the 23 pick if I fell that far, and Joe Jordan said that if I was available, the Orioles were taking me. I was hitting 97 98 my junior year."

"It's funny, I beat Gerrit Cole my senior year. I only lost one game my senior year, and if I had won it we would have stayed in the playoffs and I wouldn't have been able to throw bullpens for Kansas City and Baltimore. Since we lost I was able to and everything fell into place."

He said that he feels as healthy as he was in High School and he is only throwing 85% velocity now. There is still left in the tank.

Look for big things....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think this is totally accurate.  Means was looked at as a guy who no one could count on for this year, I don’t think anyone expected him to be able to finish the season.  Sort of the same scenario with Bradish, I think everyone thought this outcome was inevitable. They tried the treatment and that delayed it but no one should be surprised about this.  Wells is Mr. Glass. The fact that they all went down in the first half of the season is inconvenient but shouldn’t be totally surprising.  All of these guys had issues headed into the season.  
    • We have been several times. We need to be at least 1 game better in the lose column if we're 3 games down. The percentages say we're going to lose one of those 3 games. There's 83 games left to play. We just need to win as many as we can.
    • Yes, they're asking pitchers to throw at 110% all the time, just like everyone else in the world from 11U on up.
    • OP is asking about next year as well as this one. I think the point is we can get a guy who will help us now and next year. We did expect to lose Bradish but not him and Means and Wells all at the same time. Right now we would be going into next year with Grayson as our only dependable guy. Won't be much margin for error without another Burnes type. 
    • Something to keep in mind in the offseason is that the starting pitcher FA market doesn’t look that great in terms of pitchers we would sign or even want to sign. On top of that, you have several guys who only become FA if they opt out and if they opt out, it’s likely because they didn’t have a great season. Combine that with the idea that our only 2 internal rotation candidates are Povich and McDermott, both of whom have exhibited a lot of issues with command and control and it certainly is a shaky long term outlook for the rotation. Position player wise, we will (in theory) lose Santander and McCann. Hays and Mullins are likely gone. Not going to have both Mateo and Urias but certainly could bring back one. As of now, OHearn definitely has his option picked up. If it were up to me, Mounty would be traded. 2 years left of control, likely to be coming off a very solid season and we have players behind him. He could help fetch us some pitching. My expectation is at least 2 of Mounty, OHearn and Santander will be back. How so many of these guys and our prospects end the year will determine how we attack the offseason. But for the deadline, I think obtaining a starter that can be here long term is something the team should look at.     You have several options in Miami and potentially a guy like Detmers.    A Detmers/Estevez package is something I would be looking into.  Same thing with Nardi and one of the Marlins starters, like a Braxton Garrett for example. For me, the key here is that you need to upgrade the pen. I think if you make the pen really good and you have Burnes and GRod, that may be enough.  I’m not trading our top 3 prospects. I think all play big roles in 2025, although Basallo may not play a role until the season is well underway, But I would trade Kjerstad and anyone else while hoping to keep certain guys although they wouldn’t be deal breakers.  
    • And Fangraphs has the Yankees 68% to 31% to win the division.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...