Jump to content

Orioles add Independent League Pitchers L Mahon & C Johnson.


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply
No they aren't. That contract isn't happening.

Actually your wrong !

Ortiz signed a two-year, $26 million contract with the Red Sox on Monday which will pay him a $1 million signing bonus, $14 million in 2013 and $11 million in 2014. According to Edes, his salary for 2014 can escalate to $13 million-$15 million depending on the number of games he misses because of the Achilles injury that caused him to miss most of the second half of the 2012 season.

Open mouth insert foot as usual.

And note they mention the foot injury .... The Orioles/Brewers/Mariners could easily add a clause that has to do with his off field issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually your wrong !

Open mouth insert foot as usual.

Congratulations you found one player who signed a 2 year deal that pays him more in the first year. Reyes, Pujols, Fielder, Wilson, Sabathia, I can find more if you want. All of their deals are backloaded. You aren't signing a top free agent to a 5 year front loaded contract. Don't insult my intelligence and compare your offer to Hamilton to a 2 yera deal that Ortiz signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations you found one player who signed a 2 year deal that pays him more in the first year. Reyes, Pujols, Fielder, Wilson, Sabathia, I can find more if you want. All of their deals are backloaded. You aren't signing a top free agent to a 5 year front loaded contract. Don't insult my intelligence and compare your offer to Hamilton to a 2 yera deal that Ortiz signed.

Why would a player or agent for that matter care if a deal is front loaded as opposed to back loaded.... I said those types of contracts are starting to happen. You said they weren't. The names you mentioned mean and have nothing to do with the statement that I will say again. "They are starting to happen" Hamilton is a unique case and could be a candidate for this type of contract because of his age/off field history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would a player or agent for that matter care if a deal is front loaded as opposed to back loaded.... I said those types of contracts are starting to happen. You said they weren't. The names you mentioned mean and have nothing to do with the statement that I will say again. "They are starting to happen" Hamilton is a unique case and could be a candidate for this type of contract because of his age/off field history.

Who has signed a 3-5 year deal that was front loaded? You saying that they are starting to happen means there should be multiple ones out there. Give me names...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad I have so many mouth pieces here :rolleyes:

Im happy with the pitching as it is pretty much intact. The Bullpen should be set going into spring training. I'd like a TOR ...But I'm not expecting both and would be okay with getting Saunders or a similar arm. Would have been nice if we were in on Johnson or Buerle.

In a perfect world here is what I'd like them to do

1) Get Hamilton at 5 years $110 YR1 $27 YR2 $27 YR3 $25 Yr4 $18 Yr 5 $13 (These types of contracts are starting to happen)

2) resign Saunders

3) Trade for Butler for Britton/Matusz, Arrieta/Johnson, Schoop, and Hoes/Avery

4) Resign McLouth if it can be done at 4th OF money. Or go with the player we got for Andino.

That would mean we would not bring back Reynolds or Thome.

And I'm realistic enough to know you may not be able to get Butler & Hamilton. I'd like to see the organization actually do something other than bargain hunting.

In his age 27-31 seasons, Hamilton was worth $19 M/year according to Fangraphs.

You're advocating for paying him $22 M/year in his age 32-36 seasons.

So that's where I disagree with you. There's absolutely no way he'll be worth that contract.

I agree with you on Billy Butler though. He would be great here. Hosmer is a pretty poor defender at first base as well, so I wonder whether they'd like Reynolds in that deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who has signed a 3-5 year deal that was front loaded? You saying that they are starting to happen means there should be multiple ones out there. Give me names...

Whatever dude ...you cant even admit you're wrong. I said starting to happen...Here's the definition www.thefreedictionary.com/start . To have a beginning; commence in case you missed the day in grade school it was taught.

Ortiz is the perfect example of a player that type of contract fits. He's older but still producing at a pretty high level. The Red Sox are concerned about his health mainly...so they are protected if he misses games. A contract similar would be great for Hamilton .... If he will agree to a 5 year deal at $100 million ...Who cares the breakdown ..he's still getting the $100 Million. His agent is still getting his 5%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever dude ...you cant even admit you're wrong. I said starting to happen...Here's the definition www.thefreedictionary.com/start . To have a beginning; commence in case you missed the day in grade school it was taught.

Ortiz is the perfect example of a player that type of contract fits. He's older but still producing at a pretty high level. The Red Sox are concerned about his health mainly...so they are protected if he misses games. A contract similar would be great for Hamilton .... If he will agree to a 5 year deal at $100 million ...Who cares the breakdown ..he's still getting the $100 Million. His agent is still getting his 5%.

I understand what starting to happen. You pulling up a two year contract that a 35 year old veteran signed is not going to prove to me that top free agents are "starting to" sign front loaded contracts for 5 years. Because NONE have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In his age 27-31 seasons, Hamilton was worth $19 M/year according to Fangraphs.

You're advocating for paying him $22 M/year in his age 32-36 seasons.

So that's where I disagree with you. There's absolutely no way he'll be worth that contract.

I agree with you on Billy Butler though. He would be great here. Hosmer is a pretty poor defender at first base as well, so I wonder whether they'd like Reynolds in that deal.

You have to overpay in free agency its just the nature of the beast. The same way players are often underpaid in their early years. Unless he has a drug relapse there's no reason to believe Hamilton can be producing at a high level with his bat. He could be moved to DH in three years even under my scenario to protect him from injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what starting to happen. You pulling up a two year contract that a 35 year old veteran signed is not going to prove to me that top free agents are "starting to" sign front loaded contracts for 5 years. Because NONE have.

OK we will agree to disagree ...You said those contracts dont happen. I showed you a current example of one that did. Your not happy with that example because it proves you wrong. Then you add a 3-5 year stipulation to void the example. As I said Hamilton is a perfect example of a guy this type of contract will work for. Older player with past substance abuse problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smaller free agents:

Jake Westbrook

Paul Konerko

Aubrey Huff

Carl Pavano

All backloaded contracts

Again ...Your just being a jerk ... I said front loaded and now you come up with a list of back loaded. why dont you add Bonilla also. What in gods name does that have to do with front loaded contracts starting to happen????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to overpay in free agency its just the nature of the beast. The same way players are often underpaid in their early years. Unless he has a drug relapse there's no reason to believe Hamilton can be producing at a high level with his bat. He could be moved to DH in three years even under my scenario to protect him from injury.

That's wasting money. I'm against wasting money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
    • Can someone in 150 words or less explain to me what DYAR is?
    • I have a 3 hour round trip to get to games. I can't speak about other directions, but the stadium is very easy to get to from the south...some more traffic with the earlier start times, but overall - games are VERY easy to get to, imo. You don't have the hike through the city to get to games. I'm a rural guy, and it's really not a big deal. We took the light rail from Cromwell for Game 1 (I usually park in BC or FGH) and it was a breeze. We walked out right after the game, and we immediately caught a direct bus that took us back to Cromwell directly. We did the same thing last year. I gotta be honest - I think the "they've been horrible for half the season" reasoning is pretty lame. Even when they were down (and dealing with significant injuries) after the AS break, they were still essentially a lock to make the playoffs. Then they get healthy-ish with some key guys back riiiiight before the playoffs and look great for a couple of series - but I guess it was too late for everyone?  Come on.  Just say you didn't feel like it. But don't blame August play for not showing up in October.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...