Jump to content

O's Acquire Danny Valencia


Orioles0615

Recommended Posts

Should I apologize for that? Should I apologize for the fact that when I brought your argument up majority of them laughed? The reason they were brought up is because I was using those people as facts behind what I was saying since you couldn't quite grasp the idea. If you have people who do that for a living rolling their eyes at your ignorant ass scenario, wouldn't that ring a bell that maybe your argument really isn't that good?

No, I don't want or need an apology from you. And actually, I wasn't the one who started the Stanton for Bundy thread, in which you made your comments. So, you and any other of your buddies in MLB, can roll their eyes all they want. The fact that you said Stanton wasn't a premier talent, speaks of your ability to evaluate any talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It's November 28th. I can't even fathom how anyone can be frustrated with the moves already. Duquette is adding some depth which is what he does nicely. If Velencia remains the biggest acquisition come February I'll voice my concerns, but it's way too early.

This right here. For years I have watched the people on this forum gripe about how poor the depth was in our system. DD appears to be doing his best to address this issue. To quote the Oriole I respect most...."We got Deep depth"

So sayeth the Earl of Baltimore

We may not be as deep as I would like to see yet but at least DD is trying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brother,

He is not worth the time it took you to type this reply. Dark helmet comes across to me as the epitome of the word troll.

Also please do not apologize to him. Those of us who actually understand these types of moves appreciate the insight your experiences contribute to this forum.

Yep, all of us that don't agree with shopping at the dollar tree are trolls. Or is it just anyone that doesn't agree with your thinking? You call me troll, so I guess i'm allowed to say that you come across as a prime example of an internet bully, that can talk tough from behind his computer down in KY?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2010

vs RHP - 211 PA, .280/.303/.410 - 100 sOPS+

vs LHP - 111 PA, .374/.441/.525 - 160 sOPS+

2011

vs RHP - 449 PA, .224/.274/.352 - 80 sOPS+

vs LHP - 159 PA, .309/.352/.470 - 118 sOPS+

2012

vs RHP - 105 PA, .168/.190/.257 - 27 sOPS+

vs LHP - 56 PA, .226/.214/.377 - 54 sOPS+

Looks like a textbook Duquette move, at least for this team. The only question for me is, what happened to Valencia from his rookie season through the next two? Was he hurt? Did the league adjust and he wasn't able to respond? He spent a good amount of time in AAA last year for Rochester and Pawtucket.

Valencia will obviously fight to make the roster but if the Orioles can get him back to 2010 form they have a bit of a steal. Even his defense dropped off, perhaps due to frustration over his hitting (or maybe it's a small sample size issue).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With every minor move comes the inevitable moaning that we aren't spending enough money. Every team in the league makes minor moves like this one, there's literally nothing to complain about here unless you're a big fan of Joe Mahoney.

I just dont understand why we clutter the 40man with guys that arent very good baseball players. I dont think Mahoney will be a big loss as I doubt he will ever hit MLB pitching. This guy looks like DFA fodder later. I dont know how much they paid ...But it seems at first look to be a waste of resources even if its a small amount of money that we sent Boston

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree he's a decent platoon bat off the bench. I even like the move if he's used correctly. Just thought it was funny that Duquette chose to emphasize his on base skills. That OBP from the left size is inflated by a .343 BABIP in just 301 ABs and comes despite a 6.8% walk rate.

Very true, and very accurate use of those numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I don't want or need an apology from you. And actually, I wasn't the one who started the Stanton for Bundy thread, in which you made your comments. So, you and any other of your buddies in MLB, can roll their eyes all they want. The fact that you said Stanton wasn't a premier talent, speaks of your ability to evaluate any talent.

See what you fail to realize is that I live here in Miami and I attended games at the park. Which I'm sure you maybe saw some SportsCenter highlights. Stanton, who I've said is a very good ball player. If I was building a team I would want him on it. He strikes out too much and he's not very clutch when you need him like a premier player usually is. That's what separates him from premier status to a very good ball player status.

But no I do no think he's a premier talent of an ARod, Griffey or a Jeter. And my entire argument is that you do not trade TOR potential (which has been verified across the board not just by the people I know) of Bundy for a bat that of his caliber. Simple as that. Pretty sure I've been clear on that principle.

It's funny how you take a personal shot at me and have the slightest idea what I do for a living. See it's people like you that make me laugh and I appreciate the comedic relief. There seems to be some professional organizations that do value my opinion.. and some NCAA top 20 baseball institutes that value them as well. So please clean up after yourself and finish World of Warcraft game in Mom's basement. It's been real. You're going on ignore because you're just a {chump}.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just dont understand why we clutter the 40man with guys that arent very good baseball players. I dont think Mahoney will be a big loss as I doubt he will ever hit MLB pitching. This guy looks like DFA fodder later. I dont know how much they paid ...But it seems at first look to be a waste of resources even if its a small amount of money that we sent Boston

Watch out Johnny, you'll be called a "troll" again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just dont understand why we clutter the 40man with guys that arent very good baseball players. I dont think Mahoney will be a big loss as I doubt he will ever hit MLB pitching. This guy looks like DFA fodder later. I dont know how much they paid ...But it seems at first look to be a waste of resources even if its a small amount of money that we sent Boston
Danny Valencia is younger and showed more promise recently than Nate McClouth did when we signed him to a minor league deal last season. When used properly, Valencia could have as much upside to rebound.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Players have different skill sets and abilities that help to set their value, but what our manager and scouting can get out of these players can greatly increase their contribution and thus, their value to the team. Putting Valencia in a strict platoon for whatever time he spends on the 25 man roster would be an excellent use of resources. Most teams need to trade value to get value, we just got it for nothing (except cash considerations).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch out Johnny, you'll be called a "troll" again.

No, Johnny isn't a troll, he just gets frustrated. Sometime he convinces me to see things his way and sometimes I convince him, and sometimes we just choose to disagree. As all Non-Troll, Non-trollee, relationships are supposed to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, Johnny isn't a troll, he just gets frustrated. Sometime he convinces me to see things his way and sometimes I convince him, and sometimes we just choose to disagree. As all Non-Troll, Non-trollee, relationships are supposed to work.

I know he's not a troll weams. And neither am I, though i've been called one. Of course, thats better than the "World of Warcraft playing", Ignorant A*#", "Douchebag" that lives in my mom's basement, that SoxCorner just called me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not

I know he's not a troll weams. And neither am I, though i've been called one. Of course, thats better than the "World of Warcraft playing", Ignorant A*#", "Douchebag" that lives in my mom's basement, that SoxCorner just called me.

See the Ignorant quote. I did help him with his language on the other to make it as he wanted, and I have seen some behavior from you which came close to troll-like. Everyone cool it. It is best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
    • Gunnar’s base running is in the 99th percentile.  That mess is in the 98th percentile.
    • Yeah, the highlighted section here is really why I agree that the O's will look to minimize losing players to waivers just yet. Things could blow up on them pretty quick. There's a ton of risk with these moves, but they have to find out. The best way to do that is to utilize the options for Akin and Tate, IMO. We'll see! 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...