Jump to content

Adam LaRoche To Washington


Brendan25

Recommended Posts

Its going to take more than Patton. The Mariners are probably in. Tampa maybe also. And Boston. Maybe a reason that its taking so long to complete the Napoli deal is that after they saw the MRI, the Red Sox want to see what it takes to get Morse.

You might be underestimating Patton. He is still cheap and after all this time still only has 2.15 years service time. Not a lot of left handed relievers can hold right handed hitters to a 650 OPS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Casper Wells is projected as a starting OF. I could see the Mariners want Morse as an OFer.

Yeah, you could be right. I know they are looking for offense, but a team like Seattle needs to have some players that provide good defense as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might be underestimating Patton. He is still cheap and after all this time still only has 2.15 years service time. Not a lot of left handed relievers can hold right handed hitters to a 650 OPS.

I agree. But a reliever, even a good lefthanded reliever is probably not enough to get a MOO bat. Others will bid a lefthanded reliever plus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Casper Wells is projected as a starting OF. I could see the Mariners want Morse as an OFer.

Morse roaming the spacious OF of Safeco would be...interesting.....

I go back to two years ago, when we obtained Reynolds and Hester for Hernandez and Mickolio, and Hardy and Harris for Jacobson and Hoey. Based on those deals, I'd say Patton for Morse is fair. Honestly, it favors the Nats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is indeed a Patton for Morse swap, what does that mean for Matusz? Do we go out looking for a veteran lefty?

I believe this is part of why we targeted a LHP in the Rule 5 draft, and also brought in a couple of potentially good LOOGYs on minor league deals like Schlereth and Braddock. We also have Belfiore on the 40-man roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morse roaming the spacious OF of Safeco would be...interesting.....

I go back to two years ago, when we obtained Reynolds and Hester for Hernandez and Mickolio, and Hardy and Harris for Jacobson and Hoey. Based on those deals, I'd say Patton for Morse is fair. Honestly, it favors the Nats.

I wouldn't think a Morse deal is comparable to those two deals. Both were more salary dumps and there was very little competition for the players.

There will be a handful of teams going after Morse and I could see the asking price being a little bit higher, maybe Patton and Avery, though I don't know what the Nats 40 man roster situation is like and if they would prefer a second player to not be on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. But a reliever, even a good lefthanded reliever is probably not enough to get a MOO bat. Others will bid a lefthanded reliever plus.

I don't see interest from Boston. In fact, reports yesterday were that they were close to finally finishing the Napoli deal.

Seattle can offer Furbush + ???

New York could offer Boone Logan, but he's only under contract through 2013.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think we're saying the same thing, or at least we rhyme. If they're going to include one league that has completely different quality of play, why not all leagues? Why stop at the Negro Leagues?
    • Baseball is different from most other team sports in a number of key aspects: The number of trials. 162 games is a lot of games to have random variation smooth out. If you pick random 16-game stretches you'll have NFL-like outliers, such as teams going 15-1 or 1-15. Nobody goes 150-12. Pitchers are very limited in how much they can pitch. A 200-inning starter can only have so much impact. Hitters cannot get more than ~1/8th of a team's PAs. This and the prior point means that there's no way around having your 3rd- and 5th and even 14th-best players getting almost as much playing time as #1. So you end up with the most dominant teams usually not even winning 2/3rds of their games, wherein other sports you can have teams win 80% or more. Which makes baseball look more random. Contributing to this is the expanded playoffs, where a .600 vs .575 matchup is more-or-less a coin flip. I doubt most other sports have a situation where the obviously best team in the league has a 25%-ish shot of the Championship (in other words, a 75% chance of going home disappointed) on day one of the playoffs. In most soccer leagues the regular season champ is The Champ, so there's a 0% chance of that. The best team always takes a big trophy home.
    • He got rewarded for swinging at a ball at his ankles.  He might also be able to hit a fastball up around his neck for a home run.  If he consistently swings at those types of pitches it will be to his detriment over the long run.  
    • People really underestimate luck and randomness. Drungo is right….baseball is no different than any other sport.
    • Yandy Diaz' BABIP for his career is .320. Last year it was .367. While batters exercise a larger degree of control over their BABIPs than pitchers, there is still a lot of noise (i.e. luck) in the data. This year his BABIP is down about 90 points compared to last. I would bet that's about equal parts not hitting the ball as well, and not having the balls he does hit fall in.
    • I think it can certainly be part of the recipe. 
    • Sure. But isn't that like saying a player pitched 85 innings of relief with a 3.00 ERA one year, then the next year he pitched 220 innings as a starter with a 3.00 ERA. I wouldn't say that was a consistent, expected performance.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...