Jump to content

Matt Wieters to Boras: Keep me in Baltimore


fearthenoodle

Recommended Posts

But it sounds like we have four more seasons of Matt under contract. So what kind of numbers/deal are we talking about?

I love Matt and think he's essential, but to think we'd be paying him FA market value starting now, and for the next four years, plus another how many years?

I guess I'm just wondering exactly what we're talking about here in terms of possible numbers and years. It sounds pretty risky to buy out four seasons, just to secure 2-3 more years - IF you have to pay current market value for all those seasons, instead of arb, or whatever he'd get otherwise.

I think what you would do is schedule it similar to the arbitration numbers. 2014=8 2015=10 2016=14 2017-2021=17/year something along those lines is what I would think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply
My offer:

2013: $5.5M (contract already signed)

2014: $10M (arbitration year)

2015: $12M (arbitration year)

2016: $20M (would hit free agency)

2017: $21M

2018: $22M vesting option for 150 g at C in 2016-7.

Basically a 5/85 extension on what he already agreed on this year.

That's too much in FA, IMO. I'd give him something like 16-18 over those 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also from the linked piece:

I hadn't realized FRAA was so down on Wieters' defense relative to other metrics.

I wonder what they had him at in 2011?

Wieters clearly didn't have the season behind the plate in 2012 that he did in 2011 but I certainly do not think he was below average last season. (He also finished 2nd for the FB award)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FA is dying. That helps us because it hurts BOS and NY.

I think it's less death and more minor market correction. It certainly wasn't dead when Werth and Pujols and Fielder and on and on signed ludicrous deals in the last several years. It wasn't dead a month or two ago when high-risk Josh Hamilton, coming off two good-but-not-great seasons, signed for $133M. Or when Greinke signed for $150M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Seattle ever going to give that man a team? Look no further than last year when they yanked him in the 9th and we won after he dominated us for 8 innings.

They sure are good at keeping Felix a Mariner, though.

For real. I cannot believe he resigned with them. Shocked accurately describes my feelings right now. Happy, but shocked!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's less death and more minor market correction. It certainly wasn't dead when Werth and Pujols and Fielder and on and on signed ludicrous deals in the last several years. It wasn't dead a month or two ago when high-risk Josh Hamilton, coming off two good-but-not-great seasons, signed for $133M. Or when Greinke signed for $150M.

I think the point is more and more teams are spending their "free agent" money on extending their own superstars rather than taking the risks associated with signing the "premiere" free agents, who are indeed becoming less and less each year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No surprise here. I've always thought the "Boras factor" was way overblown, especially in the case of Matt Wieters. Boras did his job getting Wieters a fat paycheck when he was drafted, and that was a good move by Wieters. But now the dude just works for Matt.

The Great Satan (Boras) Factor, is always a factor. In Texas Elvis Andrus (Boras is his agent) has made it known he wants to get all he can when its time. There will be no hometown discount/friendly contract, or extension.

The Great Satan has a reputation for a reason.

This news is big because of what it says about Matt, inspite of his agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what they had him at in 2011?

Wieters clearly didn't have the season behind the plate in 2012 that he did in 2011 but I certainly do not think he was below average last season. (He also finished 2nd for the FB award)

All systems will have their outliers. Wieters was significantly above average in '12 by TZ, UZR, +/-, and the Fans. I'm not going to give him too many demerits for not showing up so highly on BP's system. I've seen nothing to indicate it's better than the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I was curious how GRod would pitch given that huge crowd and electric atmosphere. I feel like he has a tendency to get too amped up and overthrow. Granted I didn’t start watching until inning 3, but he looked absolutely in control and executed his pitches.  Certainly a big step forward as far as I’m concerned.
    • Unless Santander goes on an absolute tear the rest of the season, I don't think he turns down a qualifying offer. And even then, it'd be real easy to look at FA deals for 30-ish year old outfielders who are good regulars but not stars and realize there's a good chance he won't beat a QO in guaranteed money, especially with a QO attached. As much as I'd like the pick, I don't want to gamble 20-30M and another year of stunted opportunity for our young outfielders on Santander turning down a QO.
    • Yeah, it's getting to the point where I'm not going to cry if McDermott finishes the year in AAA. I'm not against bringing him up necessarily, but he's clearly got more work to do on control/command if he wants to be a good major league starter long-term.
    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...