Jump to content

Carrie Muskat says Cubs and Orioles are still talking.


skiba7

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 207
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You cant be serious?

What is the Average & SLG of pitchers in the NL the last five years?

Now compare that to Average & SLG of DH's over the same period!

Thats the difference... & I bet is substantial!

Before responding Red do the figures!

Ortiz

Thomas

Hafner

Sheffield

Thome

Those 5 are the only DH's with .800 OPS's, much less .900...there are quite a few piss-poor DH's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VORP is a counting stat #1...And if you want to look at that and say guys like Aaron Cook were better and actually believe it, you should be banned from posting on here.

I still maintain that health and pitch efficiency are both skills. You can be the most lights-out pitcher in the league, but if you're throwing 30 or 40 fewer innings than the other guys, that's value they're getting that you aren't.

On an inning-by-inning basis, I've never argued against Bedard as one of the better pitchers currently in the game. But he's simply not durable enough to be considered as high as you seem to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one answered my question earlier, someone said Bedard was pulled in Sep due to another injury?...What was it?

He had a strained Oblique.

He could have pitched again probably 2-3 times. Rather than risk a more serious (Arm Injury) they chose to shut him down as they had no reason to take a risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said there is no need for us to acquire Bedard because I think that Hill will be better. That isn't baiting, it's just my opinion, just like you post yours.

Joey,

I think you add depth and insight to our message board. I wouldn't trade Roberts for Hill straight up if I were the Cubs, but saying that Hill will be better than Bedard is like saying Bedard will be better than Santana. Jones will be a better player than Pie in my opinion, but I wouldn't trade Roberts for Pie straight up if I were the Cubs either. It is not that Roberts is a better second baseman than Pie will ever be a center fielder. It is the lack of premium center fielders that fuels my arguement. Someone name me 5 CF's you would take over the top 5 RF's or LF's. I can name a few, but not many. Now someone name me 5 DH's you would take over the top 5 center fielders. The Cubs do not need asecond baseman enough to trade either Hill or Pie. The only way Hill or Pie come back to Baltimore is through a Bedard deal. I do not love the return either. Bedard was 13-5 with the 3.16 ERA in the American League East, on a bad team. Hill was 11-8 with a 3.92 ERA in the NL. Put himin the AL East and his ERA inflates into the low 4.25's. The Cubs won 16 more games than Baltimore. Rich Hill started 4 more games, but had less more wins than Bedard. They are about the same age, Bedard 28, Hill 27. If the Orioles called and said Bedard for Hill, Bedard would be a Cub tomorrow morning. I like Hill a lot also, but I could name another 5-10 American League starters I would want before Hill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We Agree to disagree!

Hr's are Hr's

Jones hit 15, 17, & 27 I'd say he's a developing HR threat. (hit 25 of those in 420 AB's at AAA)

Pie hit 9 at AAA in 227 AB w/ 43 K's (ok so he may have hit 15 if he had played at AAA for 420 AB's)

So my point is Jones is a better Home Run threat!

Don't get me wrong, I like Jones more than Pie, but Pie is still developing too. Look at the doubles and triples that he hit in those years Jones outhomered him. This is why people pay so much attention to slugging % which takes it all into account.

Pretty often with younger players hitting alot of doubles is not far off from hitting more home runs.

Look at Roberts a couple years ago, when he had his power outburst, everyone screamed steroids, but the year before he hit 50 doubles, and anyone who has played can tell you a double isn't far off from being a HR.

They should both be great OF once they develop, but I would expect them both to have stats pretty near each others, more in the mold of Reggie Sanders type stats than Carlos Beltran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joey,

I think you add depth and insight to our message board. I wouldn't trade Roberts for Hill straight up if I were the Cubs, but saying that Hill will be better than Bedard is like saying Bedard will be better than Santana. Jones will be a better player than Pie in my opinion, but I wouldn't trade Roberts for Pie straight up if I were the Cubs either. It is not that Roberts is a better second baseman than Pie will ever be a center fielder. It is the lack of premium center fielders that fuels my arguement. Someone name me 5 CF's you would take over the top 5 RF's or LF's. I can name a few, but not many. Now someone name me 5 DH's you would take over the top 5 center fielders. The Cubs do not need asecond baseman enough to trade either Hill or Pie. The only way Hill or Pie come back to Baltimore is through a Bedard deal. I do not love the return either. Bedard was 13-5 with the 3.16 ERA in the American League East, on a bad team. Hill was 11-8 with a 3.92 ERA in the NL. Put himin the AL East and his ERA inflates into the low 4.25's. The Cubs won 16 more games than Baltimore. Rich Hill started 4 more games, but had less more wins than Bedard. They are about the same age, Bedard 28, Hill 27. If the Orioles called and said Bedard for Hill, Bedard would be a Cub tomorrow morning. I like Hill a lot also, but I could name another 5-10 American League starters I would want before Hill.

Wins are a horrible measure of pitching ability

Rich Hill was behind only Matt Cain in worst run support last year

Cain 3.2 R/game

Hill 3.42 R/game

I agree a Hill for Bedard deal would be done instantaneously by the Cubs, however that's not in question, the O's are demanding a lot more and Bedard's not worth "a lot more" than Hill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joey,

I think you add depth and insight to our message board. I wouldn't trade Roberts for Hill straight up if I were the Cubs, but saying that Hill will be better than Bedard is like saying Bedard will be better than Santana. Jones will be a better player than Pie in my opinion, but I wouldn't trade Roberts for Pie straight up if I were the Cubs either. It is not that Roberts is a better second baseman than Pie will ever be a center fielder. It is the lack of premium center fielders that fuels my arguement. Someone name me 5 CF's you would take over the top 5 RF's or LF's. I can name a few, but not many. Now someone name me 5 DH's you would take over the top 5 center fielders. The Cubs do not need asecond baseman enough to trade either Hill or Pie. The only way Hill or Pie come back to Baltimore is through a Bedard deal. I do not love the return either. Bedard was 13-5 with the 3.16 ERA in the American League East, on a bad team. Hill was 11-8 with a 3.92 ERA in the NL. Put himin the AL East and his ERA inflates into the low 4.25's. The Cubs won 16 more games than Baltimore. Rich Hill started 4 more games, but had less more wins than Bedard. They are about the same age, Bedard 28, Hill 27. If the Orioles called and said Bedard for Hill, Bedard would be a Cub tomorrow morning. I like Hill a lot also, but I could name another 5-10 American League starters I would want before Hill.

That's been said on here too.

Now the poster who said it is probably going to hide behind semantics ("I said could, not will!!!"), but the implication was clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I didn't watch a pitch Sunday after that Saturday debacle. I had a charity ride to attend anyways, but I was not wasting a Sunday on this 2024 squad.  I'll probably watch some of the Yankees game, but my heart is out of this squad. I still want them to win, but they have given me no reason since May to think this team has any special abilities.  Injuries hurt them for sure, but they just don't have that "it" factor. They have the choke factor down pat though. I can deal with a bad team. Hell, I ran this place through the darkest, leanest years.  But what I can't deal with is an anti-clutch team. This is a team that can look victory in the face and find a way to lose. This is team with no ability to finish off a comeback.  Hell, even in their walk offs it's after their relievers choked away a lead.  The lack of hitting is boring. The lack of situational hitting is boring. The strikeout/homerun all or nothing approach is boring. The fact that they no longer steal bases or put pressure on the defense unless you count Masolino getting guys thrown out by 10 feet, is boring. The fact that both of their super prospects not came up did poorly, but literally crapped the bed and hit like pitchers is boring.  The fact that both of their number one overall selections have been either bad or awful is boring.  The fact that the "TOR" they picked up this offseason took a month and half "off" is boring. The fact that the Orioles still have Jimenez and Rivera on this team is boring.  It's just a boring team.  I'm just not interested in this 2024 squad and have zero faith in them that they can do anything in the playoffs. Even against the Royals (who will run all over the Orioles if they play them) or Twins, I don't give them much of a chance.  I'll never root against an Orioles team, and I hope that some miracle happens and they suddenly become a better team. But I will continue to say that this has been one of the most frustrating Orioles Playoff teams of all time. 
    • Now that Snyder has gone I can passively hope they do well. They should have kept the old name (Washington Football Team).
    • Daniels just completed a pass for 55 yards thru the air.  The guy has a heck of an arm.  Commanders look like a good team again and are dominating an 0-2 Bengals team that is desperate for a win.  21-10 in 2nd quarter.  
    • Westburg is the guy I'd want to run a bit more, he seems a bit more like a heady type player so I could see his instincts growing there, and he had decent numbers in the minors. He's had an interesting year in the SB department, stole 4/5 in the month of April, then 1/3 in May and 1/1 in June, but hasn't had a straight steal since June 3rd. Wonder if moving up in the lineup killed his run game?
    • Or a guy that can just come up and give innings when the bullpen is shot after a doubleheader or even give a spot start and then be sent back down.  Is Pham a likely future ML starter, no, but he might bail the O's out of a pitching bind multiple times next year.  
    • Saturday's game was epically bad and not the type of loss a team on the upswing into the playoffs would suffer and one that I certainly hate to witness. I couldn't watch most of the game Sunday, but I wouldn't DVR it and then peek at the score either, I don't think that I would ever watch if I knew the outcome of a game in advance. The surprise elation (Gunnar's bases loaded double) and the agony of the non-send and inability to hit a sac fly is what keeps me coming back, old fool that I am.
    • Predicting what the attendance will do next year is like predicting Hurrican season in January.  There are so many outside factors that it is just a guess.  How will they finish the year, how much will the spend in the offseason, how many corporations want to get ticket plans,   how is the economy in 6 months, how do they play next season what teams we play and when, will teams like Red Sox, Yankees and big draws play well.   I also think one of the biggest factors is what corporations want to sponsor give aways and what time of promotions will they run.  If you look at attendance some of the largest attendance games minus the Phillies, Yankees games are for the best giveaway souvenirs.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...