Jump to content

Interesting quotes from a beleaguered Buck Showalter...


JTrea81

Recommended Posts

Oh, and I love how you insterted "beleaguered" into the title, as if that was somewhere in Roch's piece. I can't wait to see the battle over just how beleaguered Buck is and the dramatic implications it has on the direction of the Baltimore Orioles.

Obviously this comment is because of context, but I thought I'd point out that if I were a manager I'd certainly feel beleaguered after getting swept by a team I'm chasing for a playoff spot, and in the process lost my all-star 3B and my backup 2B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Are you going to keep ignoring people calling you out on making up adjectives and meanings out of meaningless quotes?

See I don't think they are meaningless. Quite frankly when you've got a manager that is worn down and at the end of the season, that is when the filter comes off and you get unexpected insight into the organization if you know what to look for. What seems like rambling may have just confirmed the following:

-Buck does not believe this team can win the World Series just yet.

-Buck Showalter and Dan Duquette are both shaping the roster and go to Angelos together with suggestions, not just Duquette.

-Peter Angelos still has a big say in baseball operations, so much so that a lot of moves aren't even taken to him for approval because the baseball ops guys know he'll say no.

-There are moves that Angelos has nixed suggested by Showalter/Duquette that would have helped the team.

Now we might have inferred these things, but never was it said until now how the relationship between the baseball ops under Duquette and Angelos was, nor how involved Showalter was in actual baseball operations. And it's all because Buck let his guard down a bit after being shell-shocked in Tampa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going to take a lot more than one year, two years, three years.

I would read that as. To get the team to be considered a contender, yearly, we'll have to do it for an extended period of time.

I think what people miss, they lose sight of the consistent 'yes' we get from our ownership.

Not sure how you can spin that to fit your agenda. But you do always seem to attempt to.

edit, Mr. spin doctor cut off part of the first quote. The part that put it into more context. The rest of the quote

We're in a good place. It's going to take a lot more than one year, two years, three years.

I have the most respect for people that do it consistently, year-in and year-out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, identifying guys with RISP ability is a fools errand, but have at it.

Actually it's simple - find really good players.

But I'm sure Trea is saying look for five guys like Nate McLouth and pick the one who hits best with RISP. Which is exactly like flipping five coins and using the one that comes up heads most for your upcoming flippin' tournament. (And then blaming your coach when it comes up tails 50% of the time.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See I don't think they are meaningless. Quite frankly when you've got a manager that is worn down and at the end of the season, that is when the filter comes off and you get unexpected insight into the organization if you know what to look for. What seems like rambling may have just confirmed the following:

-Buck does not believe this team can win the World Series just yet.

-Buck Showalter and Dan Duquette are both shaping the roster and go to Angelos together with suggestions, not just Duquette.

-Peter Angelos still has a big say in baseball operations, so much so that a lot of moves aren't even taken to him for approval because the baseball ops guys know he'll say no.

-There are moves that Angelos has nixed suggested by Showalter/Duquette that would have helped the team.

Now we might have inferred these things, but never was it said until now how the relationship between the baseball ops under Duquette and Angelos was, nor how involved Showalter was in actual baseball operations. And it's all because Buck let his guard down a bit after being shell-shocked in Tampa.

We know you don't think they're meaninglessness, but you're the only one. Yet you don't seem to understand the problem. You didn't get unexpected insight into the front office. You twisted rambling quotes out of context to fit your already preconceived agenda. Only you could take a quote saying that Angelos gives a consistent yes and turn that around to him routinely saying no to things. Where was it suggested that there were moves nixed by Angelos?

You didn't turn over ****, you're still the same old troll.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No premium talent per say, but OBP

This isn't so crazy... Most people on the board have been screaming this for years. This indeed is a traceable and "predictable" skill

and ability with RISP

This isn't predictable and isn't a skill. If you are able to identify players with this specific repeatable/predicitable skill you will revolutionize player scouting.

along with playoff experience should be what we are looking for.

This usually means 34/35 yr old overpriced mediocre F/As or 27/28 yr old bad players... Pass... I think it is way more important to just find better players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't so crazy... Most people on the board have been screaming this for years. This indeed is a traceable and "predictable" skill

The issue is that this was the market inefficiency of 12 years ago. Now there are 29 other teams all gobbling up as much OBP as they can find. We can expect to pay market rates for every point of OBP.

This (hitting with RISP) isn't predictable and isn't a skill. If you are able to identify players with this specific repeatable/predicitable skill you will revolutionize player scouting.

Not only would it revolutionize scouting, but would open up whole new player talent pools, since it's clear that the pool consisting of all known baseball players don't posess this as a skill distinct from general hitting talent. Basically you'd have to find out that, say, cricket batsmen also happen to be both great baseball batters and have a unique talent for hitting with RISP. It would be mind-blowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually it's simple - find really good players.

But I'm sure Trea is saying look for five guys like Nate McLouth and pick the one who hits best with RISP. Which is exactly like flipping five coins and using the one that comes up heads most for your upcoming flippin' tournament. (And then blaming your coach when it comes up tails 50% of the time.)

Yes. Since this has been covered a 1,000 times I'm sure most all of us know what the implication is with RISP. Even the droll that keeps repeating the same dumb nonsense while ignoring or deflecting from any critical responses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue is that this was the market inefficiency of 12 years ago. Now there are 29 other teams all gobbling up as much OBP as they can find. We can expect to pay market rates for every point of OBP.

Completely agree, just not sure that is enough reason to not pursue it.

Not only would it revolutionize scouting, but would open up whole new player talent pools, since it's clear that the pool consisting of all known baseball players don't posess this as a skill distinct from general hitting talent. Basically you'd have to find out that, say, cricket batsmen also happen to be both great baseball batters and have a unique talent for hitting with RISP. It would be mind-blowing.

Right, its not possible, but if Jtrea wants to develop a model that finds generally bad hitters that will be great with RISP in some predictable way, then by all means....

Maybe they could look into Jai Alai players... maybe seal beating eskimos in outer Alaskan villages.. If you can hit a seal, then you can hit a ball with RISP....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I must be in the minority.  I pay no attention to what uniforms and caps are worn on a given day.  You could ask me five minutes after the game what caps the team wore, and I wouldn’t be able to tell you. But I could tell you what happened in the game in vivid detail.  
    • I don’t see any kind of “logjam”. That would imply some sort of challenge with having too much talent in one place/spot. What we have is a hodgepodge of mediocre to below average pitchers who are very interchangeable in terms of their talents (or lack there of). Of the pitchers that you mentioned, probably Bradish (who we don’t know about right now coming off the elbow injury) and maybe Suarez (very small sample size) are any good.  The rest …. They can be swapped out for one another and I don’t think any real difference is made. I hope Means can be the John Means of 2021. But the reality is that was a long time ago at this point. I don’t think that it is very probably that he will make it through the season and pitch effectively into October and be healthy the whole time. That’s probably pie in the sky/wishful thinking at this point.
    • This question was kind os answered today on BaltimoreBaseball.com.  I seem to recall that the choice was scheduled, Friday was black jersey and O's cap (before the city connect) and Saturday was the orange jersey.  Wondering when they changed to starting pitcher's choice.   https://www.baltimorebaseball.com/2024/04/26/midday-mailbag-orioles-wear-black-jerseys-often/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=midday-mailbag-orioles-wear-black-jerseys-often&utm_source=BaltimoreBaseball.com+List&utm_campaign=06dfb0fd98-RSS_MAILCHIMP&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cddc084dff-06dfb0fd98-47594557&mc_cid=06dfb0fd98&mc_eid=f169a521ef
    • Most quality major league starter's hold their velocity throughout their starts. They may cruise for a bit, but have it when they want it. Typically command goes long before velocity.
    • Do we not want to throw a left hander and take advantage of the spacious left field?
    • Thank goodness a minor league system is not judged on wins and losses, because they are putting many Ws up of late. Delmarva is pretty much an embarrassment right now from the hitting side. The first real wave of international position prospects have been left wanting after the first month or so of the season. The Shorebirds are scoring a league low 2.29 runs per game and slashing a league worse .182/.259/.263/.523. The Tides pitching outside of Povich and McDermott to a lesser extent has been pretty bad minus a few decent relieves in Vespi, Krook and Charles.  Elias/Sig's thought on being able to identify pitching talent through pitch shapes and spin rates through the draft after the 10th round has been a pretty big failure. Armbruster was the flag ship pitcher and he's been a flop this year so far, though I had already seen major red flags from him last year. Not surprisingly these guys struggle at the high levels and why they were available that late. Glad to see Elias made a change in his draft philosophy last year and went after some younger, higher ceiling guys like Forret vs 21-year old juniors in those later rounds.   
    • Akin currently has a FIP of 1.11. He’s struck out 15 and walked 3 in 10 innings without yielding a homer.  I consider that well.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...