Jump to content

Logan Morrison (to Seattle?)


Scrat1

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Cishek probably isn't availabe but they do have Dunn and Ramos that could close. Valencia for Morrison would probably be a fair trade. Morrison has more upside and would play more regularly for us. Valencia is from Miami and they get a cheap 3B. He's never going to be more than just a RH DH for us.

Dunn's a fair reliever and wouldn't mind getting him. But if we are going to have a previous non-closer close for us, why not just develop O'Day for the role?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't get the love for Morrison- he doesn't seem to do any one thing particularly well, and just seems to be very average all around. So-so power, so-so splits, doesn't hit for average, no speed, probably can't play the OF anymore. And he's been worth a whopping -0.1 WAR for his entire career.

Is it just because he's still young and cost-controlled?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't get the love for Morrison- he doesn't seem to do any one thing particularly well, and just seems to be very average all around. So-so power, so-so splits, doesn't hit for average, no speed, probably can't play the OF anymore. And he's been worth a whopping -0.1 WAR for his entire career.

Is it just because he's still young and cost-controlled?

Yes. He had a .333 OBP that would have ranked only behind Davis last year on the O's. He would play twice as much as Valencia. We could platoon Morrison/Pearce at DH and Weeks/Riemold in LF. Pressley is fimiliar with him. He's 26 so he's about to enter his prime years. This might be a chance to sell high on Valencia because a team like MIA will value him as a 3B instead of a platoon DH. If no other major moves happen with the lineup I expect Brob back. The lineup would look like

Markakis RF L

Machado 3B R

Davis 1B L

Jones CF R

Wieters C S

Hardy SS R

Morrison DH L

Roberts 2B S

Weeks LF S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. He had a .333 OBP that would have ranked only behind Davis last year on the O's. He would play twice as much as Valencia. We could platoon Morrison/Pearce at DH and Weeks/Riemold in LF. Pressley is fimiliar with him. He's 26 so he's about to enter his prime years. This might be a chance to sell high on Valencia because a team like MIA will value him as a 3B instead of a platoon DH. If no other major moves happen with the lineup I expect Brob back. The lineup would look like

Markakis RF L

Machado 3B R

Davis 1B L

Jones CF R

Wieters C S

Hardy SS R

Morrison DH L

Roberts 2B S

Weeks LF S

Yeah, I mean I saw that his OBP is decent but there were guys available that would've provided similar or better production from the left side that are better bets and that wouldn't have cost us prospects that we don't really have to spare. I don't think the Marlins are going to just give him away.

And if we go with Weeks in left, we're really in trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Orioles were among the teams to check in on Logan Morrison, source says.</p>— Jon Morosi (@jonmorosi) <a href="

">December 9, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Orioles were among the teams to check in on Logan Morrison, source says.</p>— Jon Morosi (@jonmorosi) <a href="
">December 9, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I wonder what they would want for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23oriioles&src=hash">#oriioles</a>, active on all fronts, have interest in <a href="https://twitter.com/LoMoMarlins">@LoMoMarlins</a> too.</p>— Jon Heyman (@JonHeymanCBS) <a href="

">December 9, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From MLB Trade Rumors:

Within that same piece, Rodriguez notes that the Marlins have told teams they're open to taking a right-handed or left-handed hitting third baseman in trades. Two names of interest are Miami alum Danny Valencia (currently with the Orioles) and Josh Harrison of the Pirates.

It doesn't say we are offering, only that they may have interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Hottest teams on LoMo, per source: <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Brewers&src=hash">#Brewers</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Pirates&src=hash">#Pirates</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Mariners&src=hash">#Mariners</a>. Others also involved.</p>— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="

">December 10, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think we're saying the same thing, or at least we rhyme. If they're going to include one league that has completely different quality of play, why not all leagues? Why stop at the Negro Leagues?
    • Baseball is different from most other team sports in a number of key aspects: The number of trials. 162 games is a lot of games to have random variation smooth out. If you pick random 16-game stretches you'll have NFL-like outliers, such as teams going 15-1 or 1-15. Nobody goes 150-12. Pitchers are very limited in how much they can pitch. A 200-inning starter can only have so much impact. Hitters cannot get more than ~1/8th of a team's PAs. This and the prior point means that there's no way around having your 3rd- and 5th and even 14th-best players getting almost as much playing time as #1. So you end up with the most dominant teams usually not even winning 2/3rds of their games, wherein other sports you can have teams win 80% or more. Which makes baseball look more random. Contributing to this is the expanded playoffs, where a .600 vs .575 matchup is more-or-less a coin flip. I doubt most other sports have a situation where the obviously best team in the league has a 25%-ish shot of the Championship (in other words, a 75% chance of going home disappointed) on day one of the playoffs. In most soccer leagues the regular season champ is The Champ, so there's a 0% chance of that. The best team always takes a big trophy home.
    • He got rewarded for swinging at a ball at his ankles.  He might also be able to hit a fastball up around his neck for a home run.  If he consistently swings at those types of pitches it will be to his detriment over the long run.  
    • People really underestimate luck and randomness. Drungo is right….baseball is no different than any other sport.
    • Yandy Diaz' BABIP for his career is .320. Last year it was .367. While batters exercise a larger degree of control over their BABIPs than pitchers, there is still a lot of noise (i.e. luck) in the data. This year his BABIP is down about 90 points compared to last. I would bet that's about equal parts not hitting the ball as well, and not having the balls he does hit fall in.
    • I think it can certainly be part of the recipe. 
    • Sure. But isn't that like saying a player pitched 85 innings of relief with a 3.00 ERA one year, then the next year he pitched 220 innings as a starter with a 3.00 ERA. I wouldn't say that was a consistent, expected performance.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...