Jump to content

Phillies Showing Some Class


Tryptamine

Recommended Posts

"You should now expect very few of them to be open to talking with the Phillies."

That's just silly. The vast majority of kids drafted in the first ten rounds are going to be offered around slot except for the senior signs where teams are trying to save some money for later round picks. No kid who wants to go pro after being drafted by the Phillies is going to be concerned over what they did last year. If an agent doesn't want to work with the Phillies, the kid will find an agent that will.

I don't know the whole story here, so I'm not going to assign blame based off what's in this story. At the end of the day though, it's not going to matter next year and in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Yes, the NCAA rule is the root problem, but the rule exists and the Phillies bargained in bad faith. Again, any adviser will surely advise any college junior chosen by the Phillies that the Phillies won't bargain fairly, so they should go back to school without talking to the Phillies. I'm having trouble understanding how you can disagree with that. The Phillies actions were pretty underhanded.

Yeah, what the Phillies did was way worse and far more directly detrimental to Ben Wetzler's current and future career than what the O's did to Kim Seong-Min by not following KBO protocol. The KBO and NCAA seem equally blase about screwing over young people's lives in order to protect their bureaucratic fiefdoms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were talking about this on MLBN yesterday and said that for college kids the school staff/coaches/faculty etc. often act as the gatekeeper for the ML teams to have exposure/access to these kids. They concluded that some of those schools/faculty will be looking to block the Phillies and "protect" the kids. I have no idea about this stuff, but that's what they said.

On a side note it seems fairly crazy to me that a kid can't have access to legal representation in a contract negotiation. I'm no lawyer lover, but that seams somewhat un-american to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the NCAA rule is the root problem, but the rule exists and the Phillies bargained in bad faith. Again, any adviser will surely advise any college junior chosen by the Phillies that the Phillies won't bargain fairly, so they should go back to school without talking to the Phillies. I'm having trouble understanding how you can disagree with that. The Phillies actions were pretty underhanded.

How did they not bargain fairly? They bargained in good faith, the kid turned them down on the advice of his agent. Then the Phillies decided to be jerks and rat on him.

Did the Phillies, the kid, and his agent have a verbal agreement in place not to discuss the fact that the kid retained an agent?

I certainly don't condone the behavior but I don't see where they did anything actionable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, what the Phillies did was way worse and far more directly detrimental to Ben Wetzler's current and future career than what the O's did to Kim Seong-Min by not following KBO protocol. The KBO and NCAA seem equally blase about screwing over young people's lives in order to protect their bureaucratic fiefdoms.

That is very debatable. Wetzler isn't going to have to go to another country to find a job (or go to school).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is very debatable. Wetzler isn't going to have to go to another country to find a job (or go to school).

True, but Kim Seong-Min wasn't banned from being a star pitcher on a top college team during his senior year. By the way, what ever happened to Kim? Is he still banned from playing ball in Korea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but Kim Seong-Min wasn't banned from being a star pitcher on a top college team during his senior year. By the way, what ever happened to Kim? Is he still banned from playing ball in Korea?

He is pitching, under scholarship, at a school in Japan. You are the second poster to ask about him today.

And yes he is still banned in Korea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did they not bargain fairly? They bargained in good faith, the kid turned them down on the advice of his agent. Then the Phillies decided to be jerks and rat on him.

Did the Phillies, the kid, and his agent have a verbal agreement in place not to discuss the fact that the kid retained an agent?

I certainly don't condone the behavior but I don't see where they did anything actionable.

I have to imagine for the Phillies to do this that something might have happened like this. The kds may have changed their "number" once the agents got involved. I can understand the Phillies being pissed that they wasted picks on kids when their numbers suddenly changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is this not bargaining in bad faith? We don't know what Wetzler was offered. Maybe they told him 50K(which is well below slot) and he turns it down. Now the Phillies basically have the option of blackmailing him. Take way underslot money or we'll rat you out to the NCAA. What could the Phillies possibly have to gain by telling the NCAA? What the Phillies did was supremely shady and it is going to hurt them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is this not bargaining in bad faith? We don't know what Wetzler was offered. Maybe they told him 50K(which is well below slot) and he turns it down. Now the Phillies basically have the option of blackmailing him. Take way underslot money or we'll rat you out to the NCAA. What could the Phillies possibly have to gain by telling the NCAA? What the Phillies did was supremely shady and it is going to hurt them.

Where the heck did that come from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is this not bargaining in bad faith? We don't know what Wetzler was offered. Maybe they told him 50K(which is well below slot) and he turns it down. Now the Phillies basically have the option of blackmailing him. Take way underslot money or we'll rat you out to the NCAA. What could the Phillies possibly have to gain by telling the NCAA? What the Phillies did was supremely shady and it is going to hurt them.

This is just not how things work. Teams spend a lot of time trying to get a players "number" or how much they want to sign, especially if they are going to use a top ten pick on them. Very few teams will select a player if they don't know their number, especially if the kid has some leverage. Scouts spend a lot of time trying to determine character and included in that is trying to determine what the kid wants to turn pro. My guess is these kids gave the Phillies a number (perhaps signing for slot) that they were comfortable with and slected them. then, the agents got to these kids and convinced them to change their numbers. The Phillies felt this was bad faith and turned them in.

Now you can argue whether this is shady or not, but it's also shady to misrepresent how much money you want to sign after you are drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Same “<a href="https://twitter.com/aaronfitt">@aaronfitt</a>: Hearing from one agent after another today about the Ben Wetzler situation. There will be repercussions for the Phillies.”</p>— keithlaw (@keithlaw) <a href="

">February 20, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Same “<a href="https://twitter.com/aaronfitt">@aaronfitt</a>: Hearing from one agent after another today about the Ben Wetzler situation. There will be repercussions for the Phillies.”</p>— keithlaw (@keithlaw) <a href="
">February 20, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

They say that, and I think they mean it right now. When the kids they are "advising" are picked by the Phillies or when the Phillies want to sign a guy they work for, they are going to have to put their clients interest ahead of sticking it to the Phillies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They say that, and I think they mean it right now. When the kids they are "advising" are picked by the Phillies or when the Phillies want to sign a guy they work for, they are going to have to put their clients interest ahead of sticking it to the Phillies.

Exactly. The agents are crying and trying to flex their muscle. a young man drafted by the Phillies and who is happy to sign for slot recommendation is not going to give a crap about some agent with an ax to grind. Agents hate the slotting system because they lose a lot of leverage. This is their little temper tandrum. At the end of the day, if a kid is drafted by the Phillies and wants to play pro ball, he'll just find an agent who will negotiate with the Phillies. Most of the agents crying will be happy to collect that 5% when the time comes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
    • Gunnar’s base running is in the 99th percentile.  That mess is in the 98th percentile.
    • Yeah, the highlighted section here is really why I agree that the O's will look to minimize losing players to waivers just yet. Things could blow up on them pretty quick. There's a ton of risk with these moves, but they have to find out. The best way to do that is to utilize the options for Akin and Tate, IMO. We'll see! 
    • There are some in this very thread including responses to my post up top. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...