Jump to content

Orioles in 1st place


oldbird

Recommended Posts

<iframe src='http://m.mlb.com/shared/video/embed/embed.html?content_id=32557593&topic_id=28033182&width=400&height=224&property=mlb' width='400' height='224' frameborder='0'>Your browser does not support iframes.</iframe>

Ubie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tampa and Sox will get stronger.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I said at the beginning of the year the Red Sox were due for a large regression. They lost some key offensive weapons...and their starting pitching is hinging on whether or not last year's Lackey was a fluke or not (I think he takes a big step back). All that said....they'll still be an 80's win team. They are NOT a 90+ win team. Last year they hit on EVERY offseason signing.

Tampa was my pick to win the division. But the sheer number of injuries is staggering for them. Their rotation is in shambles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not the number of injuries but which ones for Tampa -- a lot will hinge on how Alex Cobb does when he comes back.

Boston's offense is predictably regressing but they've still got the best pitching in the division, statistically. Lackey so far is not taking a step back. Jon Lester and Jake Peavy are doing their thing and Clay Buchholz finally pitched a good game yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tampa and Sox will get stronger.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Im not so sure. Tampa lost matt moore for the season and they still have a pretty mediocre at best lineup. Boston COULD make a push but I dont think they are legit division contenders

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tampa and Sox will get stronger.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No they won't. Like it or not, this team is superior. Tampa is rail thin in any depth. And Boston is old and important cogs have been exposed as Nate McLouth types. Watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No they won't. Like it or not, this team is superior. Tampa is rail thin in any depth. And Boston is old and important cogs have been exposed as Nate McLouth types. Watch.

But the pitch-taking ability of the sox... Much more important than the pitch-hitting ability of the O's... ;)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said at the beginning of the year the Red Sox were due for a large regression. They lost some key offensive weapons...and their starting pitching is hinging on whether or not last year's Lackey was a fluke or not (I think he takes a big step back). All that said....they'll still be an 80's win team. They are NOT a 90+ win team. Last year they hit on EVERY offseason signing.

Tampa was my pick to win the division. But the sheer number of injuries is staggering for them. Their rotation is in shambles.

Great post, spot on with the Bosox.

True about Tampa but Joe Madden is a great one and they always scare me. They will be there at the end.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great post, spot on with the Bosox.

True about Tampa but Joe Madden is a great one and they always scare me. They will be there at the end.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If they should fall behind Price would go on the market and they can't afford to lose him on top of everything else.

I'm sure they can get more then a comp pick for half a season of Price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one thing that has me optimistic for this to continue is that this isn't a murderer's row gauntlet of an AL East anymore. The AL East has essentially 5 average teams. Each team has some gaping holes. Each team has a few solid strengths. Even Toronto has some talent, though IMO, they are the clear basement team in the division.

At the beginning of the year, I called our Orioles a high-70s win team and expected them to finish 4th in the division. There's a lot of baseball to be played. The Sox were a fluke last year. They had several career years for guys happen at the same time. The Yankees are old, but they aren't quite punchless as a few here had mentioned earlier in the season. The Rays with Maddon could trot out the Durham Bulls and still win 85 games and be competitive it seems (oh wait, in a way as injured as they are, they're kinda doing that now). The Jays are the only team in the division IMO that you can essentially rule out, both based on current standings (which still mean little) and the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they should fall behind Price would go on the market and they can't afford to lose him on top of everything else.

I'm sure they can get more then a comp pick for half a season of Price.

Price is gone either way actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...