Jump to content

Torii Hunter a back-burner option (Signs w/Twins)


Greg

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure what that means. He was about 6 runs better than average with the bat, 2 more on the bases. If he'd been a full-time DH he would have been a one or one-and-a-half win player.

Exactly. As a DH he would have been a 1.5 player. He was only worth half a win (actually .3) due to his poor defense. He's basically a DH, and he will want and get more than a 1/4m deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Exactly. As a DH he would have been a 1.5 player. He was only worth half a win (actually .3) due to his poor defense. He's basically a DH, and he will want and get more than a 1/4m deal.

He may, but he wouldn't from me. When you're (optimistically) a 1.5 win player at 38, I'd assume you're going to decline at least half a win at 39. So with rose-colored glasses that's one win, or 1/6. That would be my very upper limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He may, but he wouldn't from me. When you're (optimistically) a 1.5 win player at 38, I'd assume you're going to decline at least half a win at 39. So with rose-colored glasses that's one win, or 1/6. That would be my very upper limit.

I'm not disagreeing with you. I just believe some team will think he's worth a 1/10 deal. Hope it's not us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does going from 36 to 38 take you from +16 to -19 without injuries also being a factor? We're talking about a guy who prides himself on conditioning.

Sure? That really isn't hard to believe at all. He was never really THAT good defensively anyway (good at running into walls, sure). He isn't a decent center fielder anymore, he's a decrepit right fielder, anyway you cut it. He'd be Vlad or Sosa all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not disagreeing with you. I just believe some team will think he's worth a 1/10 deal. Hope it's not us.

Someone will certainly give him a 1/10 mil deal. A good veteran like that wouldn't bother coming back for only a couple million dollars since he's already been considering retirement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure? That really isn't hard to believe at all. He was never really THAT good defensively anyway (good at running into walls, sure). He isn't a decent center fielder anymore, he's a decrepit right fielder, anyway you cut it. He'd be Vlad or Sosa all over again.

Yeah, well, it's a little hard for me to believe that 2 years of age alone drops you 35 runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, well, it's a little hard for me to believe that 2 years of age alone drops you 35 runs.

1. Doesn't matter what the starting point is. He's one of the oldest players in baseball; defensive crappiness should be expected.

2. That 15 was the highest mark he'd had since 2004. Even in his prime he couldn't be relied on for that.

3. Defensive stats are not reliable year to year. They're fickle, especially Hunter's numbers over the years. To me, putting more stock in a positive figure from a 36 year old than a negative figure from a 38 year old is ridiculous.

4. This isn't a vacuum. The difference between two years isn't the same for a 22-24 year old or 28-30 year old. The length of time doesn't matter at his age. He's geriatric in baseball years.

5. He's going to be 39 next year. Seriously. We're talking about the defense of a 39 year old outfielder. Are you a close friend or relative?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/11/free-agent-profile-torii-hunter.html

Ultimately, assuming Hunter picks amongst the clubs pushing the top of his market, I think he will land a deal in the range of two years and $22MM. If he ultimately falls shy of that mark, it could well be because he prefers a one-year deal or takes a discount for one reason or another.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.

Friedrich Nietzsche

Perhaps we should include MLB front offices as a separate category if Torii Hunter receives anything close to 2/22.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps we should include MLB front offices as a separate category if Torii Hunter receives anything close to 2/22.

For what its worth, MLBTR has been pretty accurate with their contract predictions so far. Like people scoffed at their prediction of Billy Butler getting 3/30, but then he got it. They know the market well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Doesn't matter what the starting point is. He's one of the oldest players in baseball; defensive crappiness should be expected.

2. That 15 was the highest mark he'd had since 2004. Even in his prime he couldn't be relied on for that.

3. Defensive stats are not reliable year to year. They're fickle, especially Hunter's numbers over the years. To me, putting more stock in a positive figure from a 36 year old than a negative figure from a 38 year old is ridiculous.

4. This isn't a vacuum. The difference between two years isn't the same for a 22-24 year old or 28-30 year old. The length of time doesn't matter at his age. He's geriatric in baseball years.

5. He's going to be 39 next year. Seriously. We're talking about the defense of a 39 year old outfielder. Are you a close friend or relative?

1. Yeah, guys just doesn't drop 35 runs in 2 years by age without other factors besides just age (i.e injuries). Hunter has historically been a very well conditioned athlete, so if it is injury related (which I suspect it may be) it may be mitigated in the future.

2. Hunter started playing RF full time in 2011. He was a plus fielder in 2011 and 2012. Well above average by DRS. His defense in CF going back to 2004 matters little and while I think TH was overrated defensively, he was certainly above average at the position and well above average in his prime. There is a difference between defense in CF and defense in RF.

3. Which is why you shouldn't take a minus 19 as an absolute while ignoring the +9 and +16 from a couple years ago. Defense can take pretty huge hit from injuries while offense is less affected.

4. That may be, but assuming 2 years of age is the only factor that causes i guy to drop 35 runs in defensive metrics is fairly ridiculous imo. Hunter may have injury issues related to age which may be mitigated in the future by recovery, better conditioning, and/or rest/platooning. For a "geriatric" his offensive skills were still very solid.

5. I am neither. Just not locked into the myopic view that a 35 run drop off in his fielding metrics is solely due to 1-2 years in age and that Hunter is destined to be a -19/-20 run defender (worse by your assumption of the age distribution curve) in RF going forward, because you know he's 38/39/40 or whatever number you're at now.

Feel free to have the last word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Torii Hunter - OF - Tigers

According to Mark Whicker of the Orange County Register, free agent Torii Hunter is considering the Orioles, Rangers, Mariners and "maybe" the Twins.

That list is of interest for a number of reasons, the biggest of which is that it suggests Hunter has a short list of potential landing spots. Also of note is the absence of the Royals, one of the teams believed to be in the mix. The only certainty at this point is that Hunter won't be going back to the Tigers.

Related: Orioles, Twins, Mariners,

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Torii Hunter was waiting for son outside ND locker room. A free agent, he's looking at BALT, TEX, SEA, maybe MINN</p>— Mark Whicker (@MWhicker03LANG) <a href="

">November 30, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If you're projecting a future lineup without Mullins in 2026, then EBJ is a reasonable placeholder name to put in there. I would assume most people understand that it's not a sure thing to work out that way. 
    • Every year players are injured sliding head first into bags or even worse home plate. Just noticed that EBJ has a head injury from sliding head first into home (really dangerous and stupid) I'll say it again, what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players I remember when David Sequi was a decent player and ended his career with a serious hand injury sliding head/hand first into home. Cal never slid head first, and wouldn't have been the iron man if he did.
    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...