Jump to content

Toronto looking for New President to be Duquette.


OriolesManiac88

Recommended Posts

That article needs to be spread by the talking heads (Olney, Rosenthal, Morosi, etc.) to get out there what's really been happening with this "search". Toronto is in the wrong here, not the O's or White Sox or Angelos. They're the ones not following procedure.

I'm sure Reinsdorf has already started to pass along info to other owners about the sideshow that's going on in Toronto and how they're treating his buddy. I'm also pretty sure that those other owners know Beeston far better than they know Ed Rogers. Within MLB ownership circles I can see the Jays' organization becoming the laughingstock of baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm sure Reinsdorf has already started to pass along info to other owners about the sideshow that's going on in Toronto and how they're treating his buddy. I'm also pretty sure that those other owners know Beeston far better than they know Ed Rogers. Within MLB ownership circles I can see the Jays' organization becoming the laughingstock of baseball.

Reinsdorf and Beeston spoke out against Manfred in the vote for MLB Commissioner. Manfred doesn't give 2 Twinkies about either of them. Beeston's stance against Manfred has been cited by some as one of the reasons Rogers wants to replace him. Manfred would love to see Beeston replaced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reinsdorf and Beeston spoke out against Manfred in the vote for MLB Commissioner. Manfred doesn't give 2 Twinkies about either of them. Beeston's stance against Manfred has been cited by some as one of the reasons Rogers wants to replace him. Manfred would love to see Beeston replaced.

Sounds like MLB made a serious error in judgment installing Manfred as commissioner. He has proven that he is very biased and cannot/will not perform the duties of the commissioner fairly and properly. The game is in jeopardy with this guy, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like MLB made a serious error in judgment installing Manfred as commissioner. He has proven that he is very biased and cannot/will not perform the duties of the commissioner fairly and properly. The game is in jeopardy with this guy, IMO.

When his emails about the MASN ordeal are made public it will be a nightmare. But Bud was made commissioner even after being a collusionist. So it probably won't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Merovingian family, from which the Franks used to choose their kings, is commonly said to have lasted until the time of Childeric, who was deposed, shaved, and thrust into the cloister by command of the Roman Pontiff Stephen. But although, to all outward appearance, it ended with him, it had long since been devoid of vital strength, and conspicuous only from bearing the empty epithet Royal; the real power and authority in the kingdom lay in the hands of the chief officer of the court, the so-called Mayor of the Palace, and he was at the head of affairs. There was nothing left the King to do but to be content with his name of King, his flowing hair, and long beard, to sit on his throne and play the ruler, to give ear to the ambassadors that came from all quarters, and to dismiss them, as if on his own responsibility, in words that were, in fact, suggested to him, or even imposed upon him. He had nothing that he could call his own beyond this vain title of King and the precarious support allowed by the Mayor of the Palace at his discretion,... When he had to go abroad, he used to ride in a cart, drawn by a yoke of oxen driven, peasant-fashion, by a Ploughman; he rode in this way to the palace and to the general assembly of the people, that met once a year for the welfare of the kingdom, and he returned him in like manner. The Mayor of the Palace took charge of the government and of everything that had to be planned or executed at home or abroad.

--Einhard, The Life of Charlemagne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, Jim Duquette just said on MASN that he is skeptical of anything about the Blue Jays written by Bob Elliott because Elliott is one of those writers that has an axe to grind with his home team and covers everything with a slant against that team. So Elliott will write to make the Blue Jays as bad as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, Jim Duquette just said on MASN that he is skeptical of anything about the Blue Jays written by Bob Elliott because Elliott is one of those writers that has an axe to grind with his home team and covers everything with a slant against that team. So Elliott will write to make the Blue Jays as bad as possible.

Further, Jim D says that Kenny Williams told him personally that he didn't feel there was any tampering in the Blue Jays' attempts to talk to him.

Another note: Dan and Buck will be together at another awards banquet tonight, this one in New York. They were at the one in Boston Thursday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, Jim Duquette just said on MASN that he is skeptical of anything about the Blue Jays written by Bob Elliott because Elliott is one of those writers that has an axe to grind with his home team and covers everything with a slant against that team. So Elliott will write to make the Blue Jays as bad as possible.
Further, Jim D says that Kenny Williams told him personally that he didn't feel there was any tampering in the Blue Jays' attempts to talk to him.

Another note: Dan and Buck will be together at another awards banquet tonight, this one in New York. They were at the one in Boston Thursday night.

Jim also just said that Reinsdorf has said differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, Jim Duquette just said on MASN that he is skeptical of anything about the Blue Jays written by Bob Elliott because Elliott is one of those writers that has an axe to grind with his home team and covers everything with a slant against that team. So Elliott will write to make the Blue Jays as bad as possible.

This is Jim Duquette, Dan Duquette's cousin we're talking about right? Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, Jim Duquette just said on MASN that he is skeptical of anything about the Blue Jays written by Bob Elliott because Elliott is one of those writers that has an axe to grind with his home team and covers everything with a slant against that team. So Elliott will write to make the Blue Jays as bad as possible.
He's their Rosenthal? ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think this is totally accurate.  Means was looked at as a guy who no one could count on for this year, I don’t think anyone expected him to be able to finish the season.  Sort of the same scenario with Bradish, I think everyone thought this outcome was inevitable. They tried the treatment and that delayed it but no one should be surprised about this.  Wells is Mr. Glass. The fact that they all went down in the first half of the season is inconvenient but shouldn’t be totally surprising.  All of these guys had issues headed into the season.  
    • We have been several times. We need to be at least 1 game better in the lose column if we're 3 games down. The percentages say we're going to lose one of those 3 games. There's 83 games left to play. We just need to win as many as we can.
    • Yes, they're asking pitchers to throw at 110% all the time, just like everyone else in the world from 11U on up.
    • OP is asking about next year as well as this one. I think the point is we can get a guy who will help us now and next year. We did expect to lose Bradish but not him and Means and Wells all at the same time. Right now we would be going into next year with Grayson as our only dependable guy. Won't be much margin for error without another Burnes type. 
    • Something to keep in mind in the offseason is that the starting pitcher FA market doesn’t look that great in terms of pitchers we would sign or even want to sign. On top of that, you have several guys who only become FA if they opt out and if they opt out, it’s likely because they didn’t have a great season. Combine that with the idea that our only 2 internal rotation candidates are Povich and McDermott, both of whom have exhibited a lot of issues with command and control and it certainly is a shaky long term outlook for the rotation. Position player wise, we will (in theory) lose Santander and McCann. Hays and Mullins are likely gone. Not going to have both Mateo and Urias but certainly could bring back one. As of now, OHearn definitely has his option picked up. If it were up to me, Mounty would be traded. 2 years left of control, likely to be coming off a very solid season and we have players behind him. He could help fetch us some pitching. My expectation is at least 2 of Mounty, OHearn and Santander will be back. How so many of these guys and our prospects end the year will determine how we attack the offseason. But for the deadline, I think obtaining a starter that can be here long term is something the team should look at.     You have several options in Miami and potentially a guy like Detmers.    A Detmers/Estevez package is something I would be looking into.  Same thing with Nardi and one of the Marlins starters, like a Braxton Garrett for example. For me, the key here is that you need to upgrade the pen. I think if you make the pen really good and you have Burnes and GRod, that may be enough.  I’m not trading our top 3 prospects. I think all play big roles in 2025, although Basallo may not play a role until the season is well underway, But I would trade Kjerstad and anyone else while hoping to keep certain guys although they wouldn’t be deal breakers.  
    • And Fangraphs has the Yankees 68% to 31% to win the division.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...