Jump to content

"You know we are gonna participate in the Rule 5 Draft."(OF Rickard from Tampa)


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 355
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Last year in this draft, any team could have selected right-hander Mychal Givens. But he was coming off a 2014 season where he struggled with control and no one took him.

http://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2015/12/more-from-dan-duquette-plus-john-manual-on-os-farm-jj-cooper-on-rule-5-draft.html

That would have been a travesty! I hope we'll have another Givens emerge in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://rayscoloredglasses.com/2015/08/11/tampa-bay-rays-mailbag-where-does-joey-rickard-stand-prospect/

Joey Rickard has been one of the best stories in the Rays system this year after a disastrous 2014. To recap how he got to this point, the Rays made Rickard, who notably bats rights while throwing lefty, their ninth round pick in 2012 after he helped Arizona to a College World Series championship, and he played well at Short Season-A in his pro debut. Then, after he kept looking good at Low-A and in the Australian Baseball League in 2013, the Rays decided to promote him aggressively last season, skipping him over High-A to the Double-A Montgomery Biscuits. He had a chance to establish himself as a legitimate prospect, but unfortunately he failed.

In 2014 with the Biscuits, Rickard hit to just a .243/.337/.296 line in 247 plate appearances before an ankle injury ended his season in July. His on-base skills continued to be fine as he walked 28 times against 39 strikeouts, but he couldn’t hit the ball with any authority and that looked like it would be the undoing of his career. It appeared that Rickard was going to be simply an organizational player when the Rays started him not at Double-A but at High-A to start 2015. Repeating a level is bad, but doing back to a previous level usually means that it’s time to give up on a player’s future.

Rickard, though, is turning out to be a major exception to that rule. He rebounded at High-A Charlotte, hitting to a .268/.436/.310 line in 94 plate appearances, and while he still wasn’t hitting for any power, he had shown enough plate discipline (13-20 strikeout to walk ratio) to get back to the Biscuits. He returned with a vengeance, hitting to a .322/.420/.479 line as he added power (19 doubles, 6 triples, and 2 homers) to his on-base skills (42-39 K-BB), and speed (19 steals in 23 attempts). His turnaround was complete when his promoted to Triple-A Durham, and he is 12 for his first 29, a .429 batting average.

There are a lot of great things to say about Rickard, but now it’s time to get realistic about his prospect status. One thing we can say for sure is that Rickard has gone from a nobody back into a player with a big league future. He has come a long way in a span of one year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Well, I guess I need to get to the stadium by 11 AM today to watch Urias and Westburg here in Nashville! The stadium is 50 feet from my office window.
    • No, It is my understanding that he is now a FA. Any team that picks him up is on the hook for prorated minimum this year only. The O's owe him the buy out. 
    • Burnes starting won’t help anyone hit. And I have minimal expectations for Westburg in his very first game back.    We just gave up 15 runs to a pretty damn pedestrian SF lineup last two games. I don’t think a ‘hangover lineup’ is going to help as much as you think. Plus again, if we can’t score it doesn’t matter much what the opposing lineup looks like.    I did just realize we have 10 games left, not 11. 3-7 seems even less likely than 3-8, ha.   
    • Game 1 Corbin Burnes, and Sunday Jordan Westburg and a bullpen game before an off day? We'll see in 10 days, but I think the Tigers run of good play at the end will have helped protect OPACY home field for the ALWC round. Very happy flight for the Tigers, and I'd guess they are asleep at their Baltimore hotel by now, waiting for tomorrow night.    Tigers home next week with two Skubal starts if necessary and a White Sox series, so the Royals and Twins are probably cheering pretty hard for us. If we finish this week 0-4, the Yankees might have that hangover lineup the day after division clinching one of our games there.    It looks pretty likely while we are in New York, the guys will have a front row seat handing over the AL East champion honor.
    • They still need to win a few games to get there. I still don’t understand why people are acting like that is so certain (quoting you but not referring to you, per se).    3-8 in the last 11. 11 games left. In all seriousness, what makes anyone think we can even go 3-8 in the next 11?  We are bad in every single phase of the game and we’re playing against teams who have everything to play for (other than SF today, and they’ve pretty easily handled us this week already).    These last two games against SF, especially last night, have convinced me they’re going to fully blow this. We’ve already shown that Detroit can handle us. Probably going to lose to Webb today. Then it’s NY in NY. When is the last time we beat the Yanks in a late season series that mattered to both teams?  Ever? This team certainly isn’t the one to do it. And then it’s do or die in MIN. Anybody believe we can take 2/3 there?  I just don’t see a path to more than three wins, and even getting three doesn’t seem remotely certain. I think we’ll be lucky to win one game each of these last three series. Maybe that’s enough, but I’m far from sure they can even do that.    What’s the counterpoint to this?  Injury returns?  Too late for that IMO. Just start playing better?  What would make anyone believe that’s going to happen after 3.5 months of bad baseball? For real, someone tell me what they’re seeing that makes them think even 3-8 is going to happen in the next 11. 
    • We traded far too much for what we got in return IMO. You can't totally judge trades this early but as it stands now, Elias gets a well deserved D for his trade deadline performance. I've said this before. He's done a fantastic job bringing this club back to relevancy. I just question some of his roster construction and trade decisions.
    • Since July 1st, the Orioles are 31-37 and since the Trading deadline when Elias was supposed to make the team better they've gone 19-24 (.441). Now grant it the team lost Westburg and Grayson as well as Eflin for a little bit, but what can't be swept under the rug is that Elias traded a decent part of his minor league league prospects and the team has done worse. The acquisitions of Rogers, Jimenez and Soto have not improved the team. Eflin has kept them from being even worse and we have him for next year, and the same goes for Dominguez. Hopefully Soto will figure it out or Elias wasted two pitching prospects (Chace being probably being the one with the most upside of any pitcher traded).  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...