Jump to content

"You know we are gonna participate in the Rule 5 Draft."(OF Rickard from Tampa)


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 355
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm not sure that 3 HR/500 PA translates to 27 HR/500 if you went to Nexen in the Korean League. Not unless Nexen moved into Lakefront Park.

And he's leading his team in HRs (and RBIs). I'm pretty sure his teammates are playing in the same parks and under the same conditions as Joey.

It will be interesting to see which Rickard turns up in ST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And he's leading his team in HRs (and RBIs). I'm pretty sure his teammates are playing in the same parks and under the same conditions as Joey.

It will be interesting to see which Rickard turns up in ST.

I am not counting on a lot of power from Rickard. His ability to get on base intrigues me. This team could really use a guy with a bit of speed who can get on base a lot and se the table. The rest of our lineup would work much better if we had a guy like that at the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on numbers alone, Rickard gets me more excited than any other Rule V guy I've seen us take in the last ten years. May not be saying a whole lot after taking (and keeping) mediocre A ball players like Jason Garcia and zero-upside players like TJ MacFarland, but really high BA and OBP over three levels and apparently has some speed and can play all three outfield positions. Seems like a guy that might able to be the fourth or fifth OFer on the roster and not be hidden all season. Why did the Rays not protect him?

I apologize if this question has already been asked, but it's exhausting to have to go through 20 pages of posts.

You realize these are all the skills Lough (not rule 5) displayed when he came here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You realize these are all the skills Lough (not rule 5) displayed when he came here.

His Steamer forecast, for whatever that's worth, is .256/.324/.350. Defense is a big question mark. Lough was/is a legitimate plus defender. If Rickard is a plus corner OFer and a passable CFer with that Steamer line he's an asset, a nice pickup.

But is only a year removed from a .243/.337/.296 in AA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rickard's minor league OBP is about 50 points higher than Lough's. Not a negligible difference.

That's the big hope for me. Lough was not good at getting on base. His whole style of hitting seemed ill-suited to a guy his size and speed. Plus, he couldn't steal bases. We'll see if Rickard can do these things well enough to make the team. I expect he's not as good a defender as Lough, but hopefully he's at least a bit above average there.

Saying all that, I don't think the team needs to bend over backwards to keep Rickard. If he beats out Hoes on the merits, fine. But if Hoes shows himself to be more major league-ready, then send Rickard back to Tampa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lough's minor league ISO was in the .150-.170 range. Rickard's is in the .080-.140 range. Lough's OBP fell off something like .050. Rickard's will probably fall off more.

Dang! Burst that bubble for me again.....oh well, we do have Mr. LJ if he does what you say.....:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the big hope for me. Lough was not good at getting on base. His whole style of hitting seemed ill-suited to a guy his size and speed. Plus, he couldn't steal bases. We'll see if Rickard can do these things well enough to make the team. I expect he's not as good a defender as Lough, but hopefully he's at least a bit above average there.

Saying all that, I don't think the team needs to bend over backwards to keep Rickard. If he beats out Hoes on the merits, fine. But if Hoes shows himself to be more major league-ready, then send Rickard back to Tampa.

Lough's problems were that his tools didn't translate to playing the game of baseball other than playing OF. He didn't have a feel for stealing bases, and that craftiness that speed guys have of getting on base in a variety of ways.

Ideally I'd like to see us sign Venable too. Then there would be a ST comp between Rickard, Hoes and Parades for two spots. Right now I see Paredes losing out to Hoes because Paredes doesn't have a position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm not necessarily going to buy that Holliday and Mayo should be expected to struggle this much. Jackson Merrill hasn't.   Jackson Chourio hasn't.   It's not automatic that guys have to go through a period where they are hitting around .100 and striking out more than half the time.   Lots of good players come up, have some ups and downs, but are not THAT bad.
    • Sure does...but I believe he was acquired for 2025 so I won't make any judgment till June or so.
    • We don't need his bat, we are doing just fine.
    • For me, winning the division is the greatest accomplishment left in the game. When I was growing up, four teams would qualify for the playoffs: in each league, the best team in the east and the best in the west would face off in a championship series, and the winner would go to the World Series.  Winning the division back then was the due reward for playing great ball all season long. That's how it still should be. That's the whole problem with the current playoff system, in a nutshell. Winning a division after playing 162 games should mean a lot.  As for this year's Orioles, I ceased to be disappointed in them sometime in late July or so. Instead, I regard them as a promising work-in-progress whose best days lie in the years ahead. They are kind of like the Houston Astros just when they started to get good but still weren't a world-class team.
    • I can't help but wonder if our hitting coaches basically just do one thing:   preach the launch angle approach that Elias has determined that leads to optimal overall results.   Don't worry about strikeouts.   Emphasis on doing the most damage when you swing (vs just trying to put the ball in play, hit 'em where they ain't, etc). And that approach, taken as a whole, DOES lead to better overall results, and I believe it IS the correct holistic approach for an organization to take in drafting, developing, and coaching players? But if it is the only thing our hitting coaches know how to teach, could that also be a problem?    When a batter is in a slump, maybe he should be less concerned with focusing on the amount of damage he does per swing, but jsut with putting the ball in play to make something happen.    Could there be a psychological effect?   Players and ex-players will talk abouit a bloop hit helping them get out of a slump.   Football players will talk about going immediately back to a receiver who drops a ball to boost his confidence and "keep him in the game". And most "old school" baseball coaches believed in these things, and used them to help guys get out of slumps.   Maybe there is still some wisdom in that approach, not as a primary approach, but to help a guy get his confidence back, start seeing the ball better, etc.   And maybe the guys we hired aren't able to, even temporarily, change what they are telling guys to help them when they are struggling. Just speculating.   Grasping for answers at the astonishing lack of hitting we are seeing on so many nights.   
    • Repeating an irrelevant point doesn’t make it relevant  back to the discussion of data and and it’s effect on young hitters 
    • I tried to tell folks that when they wanted to throw Mountcastle into every trade scenario. Prolonged play at first and against left handed pitching exposes him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...