Jump to content

The rise and fall of Rafael Palmeiro


xian4

Recommended Posts

I think that as well to an extent. I think guys like Pete Rose should be in as well with that logic. The Steroid Era ruined baseball for a lot of people, and so did Pete by betting on baseball and the team he managed.

Rose situation is different. The Hall acted on its own to exclude him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Huh? Under these facts Raffy presented, Miggy gave him tainted B-12 and Raffy had done nothing wrong, so that would make perfect sense.

Why the hell would Raffy inject "B-12" sourced from a teammate (and have his wife do the injecting) when there were plenty of accredited medical professionals at his disposal to not only provide pure B-12 but also have the training to administer it? Openly. Scapegoating Miggy sidesteps this little awkwardness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the hell would Raffy inject "B-12" sourced from a teammate (and have his wife do the injecting) when there were plenty of accredited medical professionals at his disposal to not only provide pure B-12 but also have the training to administer it? Openly. Scapegoating Miggy sidesteps this little awkwardness.

I didn't say it was a good story, but it is a consistent story, and asking people to feel sorry for him when Selig threw him under the bus also follows consistently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it was because MLB banned him. That and the people who vote for the hall are a real fickle bunch.

The Hall changed the rules to exclude everyone on the MLB permanently banned list.

I think Rose was the only person on the list.

The voters never got a chance to vote on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, but they are dead and there was never any chance of the Vet's committee putting them in.

For the record I did mean to add living.

He's the only living player on the list. You're fine. It will be interesting to see whether or not they put him after he's dead or if they put the Steroid players in the HOF too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh? Under these facts Raffy presented, Miggy gave him tainted B-12 and Raffy had done nothing wrong, so that would make perfect sense.

Facts? How about Canseco's "facts" about injecting Palmeiro when he was with the Rangers the first time?

This topic is funny. We seem to have the exact same debate every year or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete Roses hit record is celebrated in the hall. His accomplishment is recognized.

The whole hall of fame thing is kind of weird. It gets taken too seriously by everyone IMO. it's the hall of FAME as voted on by a group of sports writers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Facts? How about Canseco's "facts" about injecting Palmeiro when he was with the Rangers the first time?

This topic is funny. We seem to have the exact same debate every year or two.

24fps implied that Raffy is being hypocritical in throwing Tejada under the bus and then getting upset when Selig threw him under the bus. I believe I cogently explained how it isn't hypocritical. I don't believe Raffy either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete Roses hit record is celebrated in the hall. His accomplishment is recognized.

The whole hall of fame thing is kind of weird. It gets taken too seriously by everyone IMO. it's the hall of FAME as voted on by a group of sports writers.

It's fun to argue about. It's also hard to take seriously when it's pretty clearly about the best players but guys who were excellent for 15 years are out while guys are in because they were okay for five and were Frankie Frisch's buddy. The debates wouldn't be so heated if it weren't for 22 WAR players in, and 70 WAR players (with no steroid rumors) out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hall changed the rules to exclude everyone on the MLB permanently banned list.

I think Rose was the only person on the list.

The voters never got a chance to vote on him.

Would you trust the BBWAA to vote on Rose? These are the same people who think Jim Rice >>>> Alan Trammell, I'm not giving them a thumbs up/down on moral rights and wrongs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Soto has had 6 years in the majors. Only 2 of them with an ERA under 4 and he's averaged a 100 ERA+. He has a career FIP of nearly 4. A career WHIP of over 1.4. Why is that valuable? Yeah, he can go on dominant runs. But so could Bryan Baker.  That's worth clogging up a spot and not getting somebody more consistent and...well...better?
    • Taking a look at 2023 vs 2024 FANGRAPHS WAR, some interesting directional info.  (Acknowledging that WAR is not definitivve,  FG uses FIPERA for Pitcher WAR).  This is meant to highlight areas of opportunity not a deep dive on data.  Highlighted 5 key areas:   1) TOR/Ace role /Burns FA.  All other roles 2-6 are likely fine.  Bradish coming back in 2nd half of 2025 would be a boost but should not be counted on.   Going into 2025 w/o sourcing a 4 WAR type of replacement for Burns would be a huge miss.    Most important decision/move for 2025.  2) Need to solidify closer and BP which is hopefully Felix coming back strong but should not depend on 2023 dominance.  Need a deep pen with reliable depth in minors and assume more trade deadline reinforcements.   Plenty of good options here, spend $ smartly but don't depend solely on waiver claims.  3) Adley - none of Elias' 2024 calculus included AR's huge 2nd half dropoff.    If he does not come back strong, may have to re-think AR contribution and make up for any defecit in other positions.  If Gunnar is a 10 and Adley's a 4 WAR we are more than fine, should not assume Adley is a 5+WAR player.  4) Santander - How is he best replaced.  Elevate Heston and pair him with a RH platoon partner who can back-up all three OF postions.  Not an easy find but needs to be impactful - a RH bat, preferably a high OBP type- that player does not exist in the org in terms of 2025 readiness.     Supposedly that's why Mayo is so highly valued as a RH  bat which is why not developing him as an OFer is curious.  5) Jackson Holliday - Biggest upside story for 2025.  Expect to see major improvement and the type of bat the lineup needs.  Should be settled in, got to experience the post season without playing but a lot of the Elias' plan/process is JH becoming a very good player.   
    • I don't get the idea of not wanting Soto back. First of all, lets talk about money.  He probably gets around $6M in arb for 2025. 37 relievers made 6M or more in 2024. 56 made 4M or more.  A 1/6 deal for him isnt bad and its not a long term commitment, which is a huge plus. After his 2 awful outings after he got here, Soto appeared in 20 games. He threw 16.1 innings and had a 1.10 ERA. He gave up 1 homer, walked 4, 11 hits and struck out 20.  For the season, his ERA was a mediocre 4.42 but his FIP was 3.68, his K rate was over 11 and his HR rate was .68. The issue is the walks. He is still only 29 years old, has over 60 appearances each of the last 4 years (ie he's durable) and he has very good seasons in the past. Even last year, when his ERA was 4.62, his xERA was 2.79 and his FIP was 3.59. With his ability to get Ks and miss bats and the upside he has, taking the chance on him for 1/6 is a risk you would be foolish not to take.
    • Haha. Our reliever with the lowest FIP & WHIP and highest K/BB rate.
    • Akin is discussed above. Pretty sure he is out of options as of this year. But I am far from a roster nerd.  Cano and Felix do have options but they are not the type of guys you would option assuming they are performing at a high level, only if they struggle. We are not going to want to option them just to get through a bullpen day or manage rest. 
    • It's a tough question. Akin stunk/hurt in 2023, this year he was very good in medium/low leverage situations. Suarez is a starter *and* was effective in relief. I don't know, think I'd rather have Suarez, tbh.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...