Jump to content

Updates on Hunter Harvey


Norfolk orioles

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

I'll take a crack .....Harvey has a 97mph + fastball that's deemed plus and a plus curveball and Hader.

Hader has a low 90s fastball with a lot of movement. The reason he's been so successful is that his slider drastically improved from 2017 to 2018 in regards to his control.

Hader's more like mid 90's and can reach upper 90's whenever he needs to, but yeah - he doesn't throw as hard as Harvey.  It's the combo of his fastball and slider both complementing each other.  https://brewmaths.com/2019/01/03/josh-hader-randy-johnson-2-0-a-kid-from-millersville/  Can Harvey's curveball have that same complementary effect with his fastball that Hader has with his slider and fastball?  Since Hader typically has the single best whiff rate in all of MLB, that's an awfully tough standard to meet.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Philip said:

Ok would someone who knows the subject provide a comparison of Harvey and Josh Hader?

they throw hard strikes and have great hair, yes but I’m hoping for something a bit more in-depth.

 

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

I'll take a crack .....Harvey has a 97mph + fastball that's deemed plus and a plus curveball and Hader.

Hader has a low 90s fastball with a lot of movement. The reason he's been so successful is that his slider drastically improved from 2017 to 2018 in regards to his control.

Not so much, Hader is close to a one-pitch pitcher with an outstanding FB. He has a unique arm slot to get rise on his fastball.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/josh-haders-fastball-is-baseballs-most-mysterious-pitch/

Harvey has a traditional over the top delivery and mix of pitches. His FB looked pretty straight to me. I would compare him more to Aroldis Chapman than Hader :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/17/2019 at 10:22 PM, OFFNY said:

o

 

This was Harvey's career Major League debut.

His 1st career MLB Strikeout came on a 99-MPH Fastball.

His 2nd career MLB Strikeout came on a 98-MPH Fastball.

 

HUNTER LUKE HARVEY )))))) (vs. RED SOX, 8/17)

 

o

 

 

15 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

In only his 2nd outing ever, this wound up being Harvey's 1st career W ........ it's a good thing that he pitches for a team like the Orioles, or he might be waiting forever for one of those.

 

HUNTER LUKE HARVEY )))))) (vs. ROYALS, 8/20)

 

o

o

 

Hunter Harvey on Bullpen Role: “I hope I Stay There”

(By Steve Melewski)

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2019/08/hunter-harvey-on-bullpen-role-i-hope-i-stay-there.html

 

o

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, OFFNY said:

 

 

o

 

Hunter Harvey on Bullpen Role: “I hope I Stay There”

(By Steve Melewski)

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2019/08/hunter-harvey-on-bullpen-role-i-hope-i-stay-there.html

 

o

That's an eye-opener and pretty much says it all about his role going forward - assuming good health.  .  

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

Hunter Harvey on Bullpen Role: “I hope I Stay There”

(By Steve Melewski)

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2019/08/hunter-harvey-on-bullpen-role-i-hope-i-stay-there.html

 

o

o

 

Mancini has some encouraging words regarding Harvey ........

 

Notes on Harvey Usage, and Mancini’s History with Him

(By Roch kubatko)

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2019/08/notes-on-harvey-usage-and-mancinis-history-with-him.html

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/20/2019 at 11:38 PM, Philip said:

Ok would someone who knows the subject provide a comparison of Harvey and Josh Hader?

they throw hard strikes and have great hair, yes but I’m hoping for something a bit more in-depth.

On this point, I'll agree to disagree. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

I like the appearance code of old. The long locks and Duck Dynasty beards look out of place on the diamond IMO.

+1. Harvey is not the worst offender by any means, but I like our players to have a clean cut look. I also really dislike that the policy was changed essentially to accommodate one player, Cashner, who isn't even that good. If Trout wants a beard and that's what it takes, OK, but not Cashner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, interloper said:

I don't think the appearances of old were quite what you choose to remember, guy. 

If you restrict "old" to "when baby boomers were young".  

The idea that gentlemen should only have close-cropped, short hair and limited or no facial hair is something that came about in the last 100 or so years out of hundreds of thousands of years of human existence.  Perhaps also sporadically in other times and places, I've heard ancient Egyptians were fond of removing most or all of their hair.  But someone in Baltimore in 1776 probably would have thought someone with Boys' Haircut #1 from Floyd's Barber Shop was quite strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

+1. Harvey is not the worst offender by any means, but I like our players to have a clean cut look. I also really dislike that the policy was changed essentially to accommodate one player, Cashner, who isn't even that good. If Trout wants a beard and that's what it takes, OK, but not Cashner.

Maybe baseball should occasionally consider demographics besides 74-year-old men.  With that segment of the population shrinking over time and all.  Not everyone thinks every athlete or ballplayer should look like they stepped out of a 1950s period piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson were baseball fans.

Lincoln grew a beard from time to time, and Johnson had locks that were longer than the Beatles had in 1964.

 

 

abraham-lincoln-baseball-cartoon-1860

 

o

D5uZa82WkAAUESB.jpg

This is the 150th anniversary of the '69 Cincinnati Red Stockings, and mis-identified as the 150th anniversary of Major League Baseball.  They should be encouraging 1869-style whiskers in celebration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'll be honest, the playoffs didn't put me in a happy mood and reading this board has only made it worse.  The amount of people, many well respected, with over the top, outrageous takes calling guys "losers" and "chokers" etc. is ridiculous imo.  This reads more like a football board than a baseball board, and that's not a compliment. I'm kind of at a loss for what they should do to be honest.  The 2nd half drop-off imo is mostly explained by the injuries, particularly on the mound, and Adley's inexplicable performance.  If they were to run the team back with some minimal upgrades to the rotation and pen, sans Burnes and Santander, I think that's a team that could/should win 95ish games and compete for the division.  But there's downside there too.  And if you get Adley of the 2nd half, then you might be looking more at 85ish wins and missing the playoffs. However, I see a lot of schizophrenic and illogical takes on the board.  A lot of people are calling for a "veteran hitter" for the lineup; many of those same people are all too happy to let Santander walk.  Some are calling to not just "hand jobs to young guys;" many of these people were the loudest in demanding more aggressive promoting of prospects. I'm just generally down on the tenor of the board, and personally, I don't have any crazy strong feelings about what I think the O's should or should not do, which is fairly unusual for me.
    • The Phillies are profitable.  The Mets and the Padres are the only two teams that have really done aggressive “deficit-spending” in pursuit of a ring in the last few years.
    • If someone pays Burnes 400 mil or anything close. I think there are owners out there that haven't learned anything and have more money that brains. Don't get me wrong - Burnes is a good pitcher but that's it he is a good pitcher that will turn 30 next year. I believe the calculus for paying 30ish starting pitchers of value is changing. I believe - regardless of Boras - shorter terms and higher average annuals will be in play. So to me, 4/120 isn't a stupid prediction. Guess we shall see. 
    • There is NOTHING preventing the Orioles of signing any player to a serious contract. Especially considering we have signed ZERO since Chris Davis way back in what 2015? That was almost a decade ago. We have been operating in a non-serious manner for too long when it comes to the org’s on field investment.  Teams that don’t spend don’t win World Series. Look at the last 20 years of the game. The Astros first World Series is the only team who wasn’t too half of the league who won a championship.
    • Some owners spend and want to win (Mets, Padres, Phillies). Some are more interested in making money (Rays, Guardians, etc). If Rubenstein is a profits based owner (has to make money year after year like JA) vs an investment style o lever (accepts some years May come with a loss or small net gain) then we (the fans) will be screwed. We will be akin to the Rays who are content with being “good”. But they are never willing to do what it takes to be good enough. I hope Rubenstein and everyone associated with the business or the Orioles paid a lot of attention to all of the empty seats for playoff games. That is evidence of a fanbase/market place who is not fully engaged.  The onus is on the Orioles to give people a compelling reason to come out and spend money especially in this economy. And it cannot just be hey look we have a winning team. The franchise must do more including investing in the on field product (in terms of committed dollars like every other serious franchise who is trying to win a championship).
    • My recollection is that MLB has rules about how much debt teams are allowed to take on and how much money owners are allowed to infuse into their franchises.   They supposedly won't approve contracts if they think a contract will cause them to exceed these thresholds.
    • Yeah like Tony T but Tony has the ability to foul pitches at will.  I want Cowser to be more like @waroriole’s Rob Refsnyder and Holliday to be Steven Kwan.  Is that too much to ask of number one picks?  But I love Cowser and most of everything he brings. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...