Jump to content

O's are 49-28 when the O's starter gives up 5 or less earned runs.


wildcard

Recommended Posts

That's a .636 win percentage.

They are 45-20 when the starter gives ups 4 earned run or less. Thats a .692 win percentage.

The starters have given up 6 earned run 8 times and the O's have a 2-6 record in those games. Ubaldo has given up 6 earned runs in four games.

The starters have given up 8 earned runs twice. Both losses. One by Wilson and one by Wright

With a 5 run offense, a great bull pen and a good defense the O's don't appear to need a great starting staff.

Tillman, Gausman and Gallardo should do well in the 2nd half. I think Worley could replace Jimenez and give up less than 5 runs a start on average.

Wilson is someone I think the O's have to look at coming out of the break and see if his arm freshens up. If it does the O's should be fine. But if it doesn't they will need another starter.

There are always injures and more starting depth would be a good thing. But really if a starter gives up 4 earned runs a start and goes 5 innings he will have a 7.20 ERA but the rest of the O's team could still win the majority of the games he starts.

Its a way different perspective than we are used too. But one worth thinking about.

The next 6 weeks are critical for the O's. When the roster expands in September its a whole different game with many pitchers coming up from the minors. Buck handles that kind of roster really well.

So its really can the O's have just a decent starting staff for the next 6 weeks. If they do it will mean making the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That timeline is the important element. That means that it's much more important for Dan to strike quickly if he's going to pull the trigger, because waiting until the deadline is burning 1/3 of the critical period.

But it takes two to tango. Teams that have pitching to trade often like to wait to see how high the offers go before they trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it takes two to tango. Teams that have pitching to trade often like to wait to see how high the offers go before they trade.

Yup. No question we are not in the drivers' seat at all (as others have pointed out, Dan does not have that advantage like AM did).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a .636 win percentage.

They are 45-20 when the starter gives ups 4 earned run or less. Thats a .692 win percentage.

The starters have given up 6 earned run 8 times and the O's have a 2-6 record in those games. Ubaldo has given up 6 earned runs in four games.

The starters have given up 8 earned runs twice. Both losses. One by Wilson and one by Wright

With a 5 run offense, a great bull pen and a good defense the O's don't appear to need a great starting staff.

Tillman, Gausman and Gallardo should do well in the 2nd half. I think Worley could replace Jimenez and give up less than 5 runs a start on average.

Wilson is someone I think the O's have to look at coming out of the break and see if his arm freshens up. If it does the O's should be fine. But if it doesn't they will need another starter.

There are always injures and more starting depth would be a good thing. But really if a starter gives up 4 earned runs a start and goes 5 innings he will have a 7.20 ERA but the rest of the O's team could still win the majority of the games he starts.

Its a way different perspective than we are used too. But one worth thinking about.

The next 6 weeks are critical for the O's. When the roster expands in September its a whole different game with many pitchers coming up from the minors. Buck handles that kind of roster really well.

So its really can the O's have just a decent starting staff for the next 6 weeks. If they do it will mean making the playoffs.

I agree with this. 4 and 5 slots just have to advance from catastrophic to merely bad. If Worley, Despaigne, revived Wilson, Wright, Gunkel, trade acquisition, a random fan in the stand...whomever...can come and pitch badly in 4 or 5 slots, we will win this thing in a walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 - 28: That's a .636 win percentage.

They are 45-20 when the starter gives ups 4 earned run or less. Thats a .692 win percentage.

These are excellent points. I don't think we're going to get much traction in the trade market as I

think other teams with similar needs are in a better bargaining position... specifically with

more prospects to offer. I feel like if the guys we have now, minus Jimenez (because I don't

trust he's going to be able to improve) need to tighten their games up. If that occurs, and they

pitch to their averages they are right in that 3.50 to 4.50 ERA range that puts us largely in the

.600 plus winning percentage. If that occurs, we win the Division with 95 plus wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think it's pretty sad that the starting rotation has allowed 5 or more runs 22 times. That's 25% of the time. Going off the numbers provided in this thread, though.

Yes but when its only 5 earned runs the offense and pen have covered for them fairly often. The O's are 5-7 when the staters allow 5 earned runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • JD Martinez would be a more of the same kind of acquisition. He is not an impact bat and he is a periphery (around the margins) piece at this point. Why not set the bar higher and sign Alonso? Acquiring Pete Alonso allows you to move on from Mountcastle and put Mayo (where he belongs right now) DH. It also allows you to move on from O'Hearn.  Alonso gets everyday ABs and Mayo does. Those two things to a large degree help solve the lineup imbalance against LHP. I know Alonso will cost real money. But again who are we paying? The money is there. It's time to start using it (if we want to win in October).
    • Your full quote said to use him as a DH for 100+ games. If you are worried about him being covered through his injuries - how can you assume he wouldn't be injured at the end of the season, going into the playoffs?
    • Here’s an exercise… it’s the postseason and the bases are loaded. The Santa scenario. Who on our current roster would you rather have up over JD Martinez?  Same fact pattern as Santander’s AB. 
    • I think the title of this thread told you his status
    • Why did you pare down my quote about it being for the post season and not just 162?  People, always so quick to clown someone. Lmao. Damn. At least use my whole quote bro.  If you think that we don’t need at least one proven playoff bat then that’s ok. My point is, that we have enough 1B/DH options to carry JD through his ups/downs/injuries over 162 for his experience, leadership, and playoff experience.  You can disagree, but quote me right. 
    • It's kind of amazing to me how no one knows Suarez's free agent status. I've heard it both ways. He's Schrodinger's baseball player.
    • Since JD Martinez has a career OPS of .950 in the postseason across 12 series and 151 plate appearances, I am sure our FO will have no use for him.  A veteran player who has experienced a lot of postseason success rarely helps young teams get to that next level.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...