Jump to content

Erasmo Ramirez


wildcard

Recommended Posts

The Rays don't like to trade within the division so there'll be a division tax. I think Mancini should do it.

I would try everything not to trade Sisco and Mancini. Just because their going to be cheap replacements for Trumbo/MW/P.Alvarez.

Ramirez has value, but I think he's pretty close to Worley. Probably a little better. I like Worley. I just wouldn't expect some big return for him.

Worley-28 yrs old, 2.5 years of control left

567 IP

3.71 ERA

126 G 85 GS

1.388 WHIP

6.8 SO/9 2.8 BB/9

Ramirez- 26 yrs old, 3.5 years of control left

430 IP

121 G 63 GS

4.19 ERA

1.265 WHIP

7.1 SO/9 2.7 BB/9

Worley got put on waivers by the Pirates last year. We claimed him around the world series. He was probably a non tender candidate for them. Ramirez at 4 million and a ton of arms behind him really puts the Rays in a bind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I would try everything not to trade Sisco and Mancini. Just because their going to be cheap replacements for Trumbo/MW/P.Alvarez.

Ramirez has value, but I think he's pretty close to Worley. Probably a little better. I like Worley. I just wouldn't expect some big return for him.

Worley-28 yrs old, 2.5 years of control left

567 IP

3.71 ERA

126 G 85 GS

1.388 WHIP

6.8 SO/9 2.8 BB/9

Ramirez- 26 yrs old, 3.5 years of control left

430 IP

121 G 63 GS

4.19 ERA

1.265 WHIP

7.1 SO/9 2.7 BB/9

There are a number of good DH FA replacements next fall. Wouldn't be too expensive to fill that slot. I wouldn't trade Cisco for Erasmo. We do need him for the future more than Mancini.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely not! This type of trade is a "make a trade just to make one." No way you give up a good arm like Wright for this guy. That is the type of strategy that has caused up to move good arms in the past. DD either gets a salary dump or just needs to stand pat. He's the genius that ignored starting pitching in the offseason.

Erasmo is a 5th starter/swingman. Wright is in that category from what he has shown so far. Control is a problem in spite of his stuff. 3.3 years of Erasmo for 5.3 years of Wright. Considering the O's needs I would do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you wont get him. You have to pay to play. We don't need Mancini as much as we need SP depth if we want to go for it.

Well that is an opinion. I wouldn't trade a full time starting player for a 5th starter/swingman. But that is just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would try everything not to trade Sisco and Mancini. Just because their going to be cheap replacements for Trumbo/MW/P.Alvarez.

Ramirez has value, but I think he's pretty close to Worley. Probably a little better. I like Worley. I just wouldn't expect some big return for him.

Worley-28 yrs old, 2.5 years of control left

567 IP

3.71 ERA

126 G 85 GS

1.388 WHIP

6.8 SO/9 2.8 BB/9

Ramirez- 26 yrs old, 3.5 years of control left

430 IP

121 G 63 GS

4.19 ERA

1.265 WHIP

7.1 SO/9 2.7 BB/9

Worley got put on waivers by the Pirates last year. We claimed him around the world series. He was probably a non tender candidate for them. Ramirez at 4 million and a ton of arms behind him really puts the Rays in a bind.

Good analysis. I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a number of good DH FA replacements next fall. Wouldn't be too expensive to fill that slot. I wouldn't trade Cisco for Erasmo. We do need him for the future more than Mancini.

The money we save on Mancini at DH next year can go directly to keeping Trumbo or MW.

Ramirez controlled years don't have that much value because he's already gotten paid like a starter in arbitration. His future arb numbers will probably be 4,6,8 for a guy that is Vance Worley. At best he's Bartolo Colon. Colon now. Not the Colon prime years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The money we save on Mancini at DH next year can go directly to keeping Trumbo or MW.

Ramirez controlled years don't have that much value because he's already gotten paid like a starter in arbitration. His future arb numbers will probably be 4,6,8 for a guy that is Vance Worley. At best he's Bartolo Colon. Colon now. Not the Colon prime years.

I'd rather put the money toward signing Manny and Tillman.

The O's are going to have some high price guys and need a flow of 0-3 year players to off set the cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would in a second. Quality starter for borderline first base prospect ( a position that is filled for years to come). I don't think the Rays would do that deal.

I didn't say I wouldn't trade Mancini. I just would not do it for a borderline starter which is what Erasmo is.

Mancini may help the O's win the division come September. He can platoon with Pedro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that is an opinion. I wouldn't trade a full time starting player for a 5th starter/swingman. But that is just me.
I would if he helps us get to the WS. Mancini is at best a DH next year. We could sign Beltran, Lind, Moss, Santana, or even Teix. Erasmo would be a solid #5 next season behind Tillman, Gausman, Bundy, and Gallardo. We need that more than a DH who might hit at the ML level.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The money we save on Mancini at DH next year can go directly to keeping Trumbo or MW.

Ramirez controlled years don't have that much value because he's already gotten paid like a starter in arbitration. His future arb numbers will probably be 4,6,8 for a guy that is Vance Worley. At best he's Bartolo Colon. Colon now. Not the Colon prime years.

Colon now would be our #2 SP. 3.35 ERA 121 ERA+ 1.202 WHIP. Not too shabby.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would if he helps us get to the WS. Mancini is at best a DH next year. We could sign Beltran, Lind, Moss, Santana, or even Teix. Erasmo would be a solid #5 next season behind Tillman, Gausman, Bundy, and Gallardo. We need that more than a DH who might hit at the ML level.

All the guys you mentioned are going to get between 5-8m per year next year. Mancini will make 507.5K depending on what he new CBA says. He money is important to the O's. Heck, DD trades away draft choices for less.

Erasmo is no sure thing, I agree with the comparison to Worley. Probably will help but may not even be in the rotation next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...