Jump to content

Pedro back. (Will he opt out?)


oriolesacox

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Garabez Rosa 847 OPS in AA.  Plays all over including CF and RF and 3B when Manny moves to SS to spell Hardy.   Janish DFA'd to AAA. Rosa is killing lefties to a 977 OPS pace.

http://legendsondeck.com/eastern-league-player-week-2b-garabez-rosa-orioles/

Garabez Rosa is 27 years old and has only ever very scarcely played about Double-A. This is the first time he's ever actually hit. His BABIP and other numbers are way over his career averages, suggesting luck. He is not a prospect, he's an organizational body. He has played 95 percent of his career games in the infield.

He is not the answer to anything except "Who's playing second for the Bay Sox?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 385
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Short bench is an option. We somehow did that way longer than I expected. It depends on the starters going deep and the pen holding leads. 

Really though what would the value of doing that though?  Your basically admitting that Kim has no role. He's not a rule 5 guy. He's not under contract for next year. He's not going to build his trade value being buried further on the bench. 

DD refuses to get rid of Kim and Ubaldo. At least Ubaldo can eat innings. 

If/when Santander finally has to be added to the roster, Kim is sayonara.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

Garabez Rosa is 27 years old and has only ever very scarcely played about Double-A. This is the first time he's ever actually hit. His BABIP and other numbers are way over his career averages, suggesting luck. He is not a prospect, he's an organizational body. He has played 95 percent of his career games in the infield.

He is not the answer to anything except "Who's playing second for the Bay Sox?"

Maybe you are right.  But he is on a hot streak right now.   If he could help the O's for only a week or two that would be worth promoting him.   He plays everywhere for a position player and is killing lefties which would be good for a platoon in right field.

I am not saying it is something that Dan and Buck would do.   Just something I think would fit for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

Maybe you are right.  But he is on a hot streak right now.   If he could help the O's for only a week or two that would be worth promoting him.   He plays everywhere for a position player and is killing lefties which would be good for a platoon in right field.

I am not saying it is something that Dan and Buck would do.   Just something I think would fit for a while.

He's never proven able to hit AAA pitching, let alone MLB pitching. It's not that simple. The stats don't just automatically translate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

He's never proven able to hit AAA pitching, let alone MLB pitching. It's not that simple. The stats don't just automatically translate.

The only reason to send a position player to Norfolk's Harbor Park is to screw them up.  No one does very well there.   Mancini did great at Bowie.  He did good away for Harbor Park.  He did poorly in Harbor Park.  Did that mean anything? No.   He is doing great again in the majors.   

If the O's want a position player to do well just promote him from AA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Rickard, any RHB that isn't at the top of line-up (and probably Hardy), Kim, etc.

Basically Rickard. Not enough of a reason to option/DFA somone to make room for an occasional PH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

Your post didn't sound like that:

"First of all, I'm not really sure there is an offensive "problem," as opposed to an offensive blip.    As of May 20, the O's were averaging 4.78 runs/game, and I believe they were 4th in the league in runs/game at that point.   Then they went into a 9-game tailspin where they scored 23 runs in 9 games. "

That makes it sound like you believe that the O's offense of May  20th was representative of what the current roster could produce but they where just in a slump since that.  Truth is that the May20, 21 was the blip  as the high point of May after scoring 21 run in two games.  Certainly not representative at all.

Have you come to conclusion that the O's could use some offensive help? 

 

 

 

Every team in the majors can use some offensive help.    I don't think the defensive cost of inserting Pedro Alvarez into our lineup is worth the mild boost he might provide.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎4‎/‎26‎/‎2017 at 1:15 PM, sportsfan8703 said:

Who is this Pedro you speak of?  Same guy in AAA that is batting an interstate vs. AAA pitching?  Do you realize the level of bums in AAA?  Just think he's hitting against the Mike Wright's and Tyler Wilson's of world every AB.  

 

On ‎5‎/‎5‎/‎2017 at 11:24 AM, dan-O said:

His line drive rate is way up, which is weird. I want to see more fly balls, personally. I don't really know what the answer is with Davis or Trumbo right now.

 

On ‎5‎/‎5‎/‎2017 at 4:24 PM, backwardsk said:

Chris Davis is not hitting .221.

Duquette signed him.  The same GM who brought this organization out of purgatory.

 

On ‎5‎/‎8‎/‎2017 at 0:22 PM, DirtyBird said:

What's the obsession with keeping Santander?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

The only reason to send a position player to Norfolk's Harbor Park is to screw them up.  No one does very well there.   Mancini did great at Bowie.  He did good away for Harbor Park.  He did poorly in Harbor Park.  Did that mean anything? No.   He is doing great again in the majors.   

If the O's want a position player to do well just promote him from AA.

Allow me to be more clear. Garabez Rosa is an organizational guy with no MLB future. He's only been given 87 at bats beyond AA ball, and he's been in the system since he was 18. He is now 27. He has played over 1,000 minor league baseball games and can't get past AA. Garabez Rosa is not a Major League caliber player. He's an old guy by AA standards who is off to a hot start - made apparent by his .394 BABIP, which is about 70 points above his career average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

The ever-streaky Pedro Alvarez is not going to solve what's ailing the O's. They don't really need offensive help, so much as they need the guys that are everyday players (namely Machado, Davis, etc.) to start freaking hitting. Alvarez wouldn't replace either of them in the lineup under any circumstances under Buck. So he's not going to fix anything by showing up and maybe having a hot week or two before following it one of his cold weeks or four.

This is exactly right, and it's why Pedro has no place on the Orioles.

Wildcard, you keep talking about how Pedro would provide offensive help, but how? Who would he be replacing in the lineup? Not Smith, who is hitting pretty well this year (aside from his recent slump) and is better defensively than Pedro. Not Mancini, who has basically hit his way into an everyday job. Not Trumbo or Davis, who are everyday players under Buck.

Basically Alvarez's only role would be as a glorified pinch-hitter. And that's not going to improve the offense the way you think it will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

Allow me to be more clear. Garabez Rosa is an organizational guy with no MLB future. He's only been given 87 at bats beyond AA ball, and he's been in the system since he was 18. He is now 27. He has played over 1,000 minor league baseball games and can't get past AA. Garabez Rosa is not a Major League caliber player. He's an old guy by AA standards who is off to a hot start - made apparent by his .394 BABIP, which is about 70 points above his career average.

Ok, tell me what you really think about him. Don't hold back so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PaulFolk said:

This is exactly right, and it's why Pedro has no place on the Orioles.

Wildcard, you keep talking about how Pedro would provide offensive help, but how? Who would he be replacing in the lineup? Not Smith, who is hitting pretty well this year (aside from his recent slump) and is better defensively than Pedro. Not Mancini, who has basically hit his way into an everyday job. Not Trumbo or Davis, who are everyday players under Buck.

Basically Alvarez's only role would be as a glorified pinch-hitter. And that's not going to improve the offense the way you think it will.

I have a lot more faith in Buck to match of hitter to pitcher than that.  And do you really think all those players are stay heathy all season and not slump?  So Alvarez has hit two homers off a pitcher in the past and Smith is O for and you think Smith gets the playing time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

The only reason to send a position player to Norfolk's Harbor Park is to screw them up.  No one does very well there.   Mancini did great at Bowie.  He did good away for Harbor Park.  He did poorly in Harbor Park.  Did that mean anything? No.   He is doing great again in the majors.   

If the O's want a position player to do well just promote him from AA.

This is 100% true.  Markakis didn't play there.  Machado didn't play there.  Schoop stuggled.  Weiters struggled.  Joseph struggled there.  In fact only Reimold and Chris Parmalee are the two only players in recent memory that have had big stretches down there.  Just goes to show how much of the game is confidence, and how terrrible and overrated are pitching prospects have been.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...