Jump to content

Pedro back. (Will he opt out?)


oriolesacox

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Moondoggie said:

But how do you know he'll be a bad outfielder? As I noted previously, he never had any problem with popups or short fly balls when he played third base. Nor were his instincts a problem. His problem was throwing the ball to first base. It's entirely possible he may be able to catch fly balls and hit the cutoff man effectively. If that's the case, it's just a matter of seeing whether or not he has adequate instincts and then giving him some experience. He's more mobile than Trumbo. So what harm does it do to give him a shot on a minor league deal? It's not like they're planning to take him to Baltimore on Opening Day and stick him in left field.

Kim can catch a fly ball right to him. It's routes and range that hurt him. I'm not sure being more mobile than Trumbo is that hard to do. And I already stated it's not a bad move. But he doesn't fit the "speed and defensive" OF DD preached all winter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 385
  • Created
  • Last Reply
13 minutes ago, Moondoggie said:

But how do you know he'll be a bad outfielder? As I noted previously, he never had any problem with popups or short fly balls when he played third base. Nor were his instincts a problem. His problem was throwing the ball to first base. It's entirely possible he may be able to catch fly balls and hit the cutoff man effectively. If that's the case, it's just a matter of seeing whether or not he has adequate instincts and then giving him some experience. He's more mobile than Trumbo. So what harm does it do to give him a shot on a minor league deal? It's not like they're planning to take him to Baltimore on Opening Day and stick him in left field.

I know he will be bad outfielder because he's big, fat, and slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

Kim can catch a fly ball right to him. It's routes and range that hurt him. I'm not sure being more mobile than Trumbo is that hard to do. And I already stated it's not a bad move. But he doesn't fit the "speed and defensive" OF DD preached all winter. 

But Alvarez isn't a big, lumbering guy. He's fairly athletic. He had good range at third, so maybe he'll have good range in the outfield. It might come down more to the instincts than anything else and we won't really know until he gives it a try. So I fully believe they're going to give him a look in the outfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Moondoggie said:

But Alvarez isn't a big, lumbering guy. He's fairly athletic. He had good range at third, so maybe he'll have good range in the outfield. It might come down more to the instincts than anything else and we won't really know until he gives it a try. So I fully believe they're going to give him a look in the outfield.

He's not a big lumbering guy? Are we talking about the same Pedro Alvarez? And good range at 3B where you make a step or two to one side or the other, is a huge difference then chasing a ball down in the gap, or running in on a sinking liner. Compared to Alvarez, Kim is athletic looking...and he can't do it well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Moondoggie said:

But how do you know he'll be a bad outfielder? As I noted previously, he never had any problem with popups or short fly balls when he played third base. Nor were his instincts a problem. His problem was throwing the ball to first base. It's entirely possible he may be able to catch fly balls and hit the cutoff man effectively. If that's the case, it's just a matter of seeing whether or not he has adequate instincts and then giving him some experience. He's more mobile than Trumbo. So what harm does it do to give him a shot on a minor league deal? It's not like they're planning to take him to Baltimore on Opening Day and stick him in left field.

This is one of those concepts where your Bayesian prior has to be "he's a gonna be terrible".  Seriously, we know it's stretching credibility to think a guy who wasn't good enough to really play third, and didn't impress anyone at first, is going to be anything but a poor outfielder.  He's slow, and he's never played a professional inning in the outfield.  We know he's not even stood in an kind of a game since at least 2008.  Just knowing that I'd pencil him in as a -15 outfielder and then kind of adjust from there with observations and data.

I'm actually going with the idea that the O's are running a kind science experiment to determine the outer limits of modern defensive metrics and tracking systems.  Kind of a baseline of data, what does happen when you put someone fully unqualified to be a major league outfielder in the outfield.  Similar to observing pitchers hitting.  The next iteration will be one involving no second baseman but four outfielders.  All in the name of science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moondoggie said:

He's more athletic than you think.

I guess we will see. I saw the opposite of an athlete when he got his chances to play defense and when he was baserunning. The only way he could have even average range would be if they let him play on a Segway.

He's about as "athletic" as Mark Trumbo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

This is one of those concepts where your Bayesian prior has to be "he's a gonna be terrible".  Seriously, we know it's stretching credibility to think a guy who wasn't good enough to really play third, and didn't impress anyone at first, is going to be anything but a poor outfielder.  He's slow, and he's never played a professional inning in the outfield.  We know he's not even stood in the outfield in a professional game since at least 2008.  Just knowing that I'd pencil him in as a -15 outfielder and then kind of adjust from there with observations and data.

I'm actually going with the idea that the O's are running a kind science experiment to determine the outer limits of modern defensive metrics and tracking systems.  Kind of a baseline of data, what does happen when you put someone fully unqualified to be a major league outfielder in the outfield.  Similar to observing pitchers hitting.  The next iteration will be one involving no second baseman but four outfielders.  All in the name of science.

That's a bit too harsh a criticism.  If you discount the impact the yips had one his throwing his numbers were not bad at third.  I don't think the yips has much to do with a lack of athleticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Moondoggie said:

But Alvarez isn't a big, lumbering guy. He's fairly athletic. He had good range at third, so maybe he'll have good range in the outfield. It might come down more to the instincts than anything else and we won't really know until he gives it a try. So I fully believe they're going to give him a look in the outfield.

He absolutely is a big, lumbering guy now. Back when he could play third, he was noticeably in better shape and of course, younger. Guys who can't play corner infield at acceptable levels almost definitely can't play outfield either. You have to assume he's going to be very bad at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

What makes you think that? He was horrible last year in a SSS. Just because he has speed doesn't mean he can play defense. 

 

34 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

What makes you think that? He was horrible last year in a SSS. Just because he has speed doesn't mean he can play defense. 

I think Joey can play defense because I actually watched him do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That's a bit too harsh a criticism.  If you discount the impact the yips had one his throwing his numbers were not bad at third.  I don't think the yips has much to do with a lack of athleticism.

This is the same guy who got moved to first by the Pirates, and in 2015 was a -14 first baseman.  The Orioles looked at that and made him a DH.  I wasn't even thinking about his handful of innings with the O's, it was more like his last season or so with the Pirates at third he graded out as way below average, and was worse at first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

This is the same guy who got moved to first by the Pirates, and in 2015 was a -14 first baseman.  The Orioles looked at that and made him a DH.  I wasn't even thinking about his handful of innings with the O's, it was more like his last season or so with the Pirates at third he graded out as way below average, and was worse at first.

Sure, that is all fair game and the reason I think it won't work out.

But his problems at third were mostly due to throwing yips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Babypowder said:

He absolutely is a big, lumbering guy now. Back when he could play third, he was noticeably in better shape and of course, younger. Guys who can't play corner infield at exceptabke levels almost definitely can't play outfield either. You have to assume he's going to be very bad at it.

I'd like a few examples of -10 to -20 corner infielders moving to the outfield and being acceptable.  There won't be many samples in your dataset because that's like giving a guy who couldn't put together an IKEA cabinet a job building a house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...